, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 167–205 | Cite as

Switching costs, experience goods and dynamic price competition

  • Toker DoganogluEmail author


I analyze a dynamic duopoly with an infinite horizon where consumers are uncertain about their potential satisfaction from the products and face switching costs. I derive sufficient conditions for the existence of a Markov Perfect Equilibrium(MPE) where switching takes place each period. I show that when switching costs are sufficiently low, the prices in the steady state are lower than what they would have been when they are absent. This result is in contrast to those found in the literature. In the presence of low switching costs competition can be fiercer.


Dynamic price competition Experience goods Markov-perfect equilibrium Switching costs 

JEL Classification

C73 D21 D43 L13 L14 L15 



I would like to thank Volkswagen Stiftung for the generous financial support which made this research possible. All errors are mine.


  1. Basar, T., & Oldser, G. (1982). Dynamic noncooperative game theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Beggs, A., & Klemperer, P. D. (1992). Multiperiod competition with switching costs. Econometrica, 60, 651–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cabral, L. (2008). Switching costs and price competition. New York University, mimeo.Google Scholar
  4. Dubé, J.-P., Hitsch, G. J., & Rossi, P. E. (2009). Do switching costs make markets less competitive? Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 435–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gehrig, T., & Stenbacka, R. (2004). Differentiation-induced switching costs and poaching. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 13, 635–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Farrell, J., & Klemperer, P. (2007). Coordination and lock-in: Competition with switching costs and network effects. In M. Armstrong & R. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of industrial organization (Vol. 3). Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Farrell, J., & Shapiro, C. (1988). Dynamic competition with switching costs. Rand Journal of Economics, 19, 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fudenberg, D., & Tirole, J. (2000). Customer poaching and brand switching. Rand Journal of Economics, 31, 634–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Klemperer, P. D. (1987a). Markets with consumer switching costs. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102, 375–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Klemperer, P. D. (1987b). The competitiveness of markets with switching costs. Rand Journal of Economics, 18, 138–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Klemperer, P. D. (1987c). Entry deterrence in markets with consumer switching costs. Economic Journal, 97, 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Klemperer, P. D. (1988). Welfare effects of entry into markets with switching costs. Journal of Industrial Economics, 37, 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Klemperer, P. D. (1989). Price wars caused by switching costs. Review of Economic Studies, 56, 405–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klemperer, P. D. (1995). Competition when consumers have switching costs: An overview with applications to industrial organization, macroeconomics, and international trade. Review of Economic Studies, 62, 515–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maskin, E., & Tirole, J. (2001). Markov perfect equilibrium: I. Observable actions. Journal of Economic Theory, 100, 191–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maskin, E., & Tirole, J. (1987). A theory of dynamic oligopoly, III: Cournot competition. European Economics Review, 31, 947–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Padilla, A. J. (1995). Revisiting dynamic duopoly with consumer switching costs. Journal of Economic Theory, 67, 520–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. To, T. (1996). Multi-period competition with switching costs: An overlapping generations formulation. Journal of Industrial Economics, 44, 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Villas-Boas, J. M. (2006). Dynamic competition with experience goods. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 15, 37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Viard, V. B. (2003). Do switching costs make markets more or less competitive?: The case of 800-number portability. Working Paper no. 1773, Stanford Graduate School of Business.Google Scholar
  21. Vives, X. (1999). Oligopoly pricing: Old ideas and new tools. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. von Weizsäcker, C. C. (1984). The costs of substitution. Econometrica, 52, 1085–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business and EconomicsUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
  2. 2.Faculty of Arts and SciencesSabanci UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations