Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Implementation of quantum secret sharing and quantum binary voting protocol in the IBM quantum computer

  • Published:
Quantum Information Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantum secret sharing is a way to share secret messages among the clients in a group with complete security. For the first time, Hillery et al. (Phys Rev A 59:1829, 1999) proposed the quantum version of classical secret sharing protocol using GHZ states. Here, we implement the above quantum secret sharing protocol in ‘IBM Q 5 Tenerife’ quantum processor and compare the experimentally obtained results with the theoretically predicted ones. Further, a new quantum binary voting protocol is proposed and implemented in the 14-qubit ‘IBM Q 14 Melbourne’ quantum processor. The results are analyzed through the technique of quantum state tomography, and the fidelity of states is calculated for different number of executions made in the device.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shamir, A.: How to share a secret. Commun. ACM 22, 612 (1979)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Blakley, G.R.: Safeguarding cryptographic keys. In: International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge, pp. 313–317. IEEE Computer Society, New York (1979)

  3. Gottesman, D.: Theory of quantum secret sharing. Phys. Rev. A 61, 042311 (2000)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh, S.K., Srikanth, R.: Generalized quantum secret sharing. Phys. Rev. A 71, 012328 (2005)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Schneier, B.: Applied Cryptography, p. 70. Wiley, New York (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Gruska, J.: Foundations of Computing, p. 504. Thomson Computer Press, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shor, P.W.: Algorithms for quantum computation: Discrete logarithms and factoring. In: Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 124–134. Santa Fe, New Mexico (1994)

  8. Grover, L.K.: A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium Theory of Computing, pp. 212–219. ACM Press, New York (1996)

  9. Gangopadhyay, S., Behera, B.K., Panigrahi, P.K.: Generalization and demonstration of an entanglement-based Deutsch–Jozsa-like algorithm using a 5-qubit quantum computer. Quantum Inf. Process. 17, 160 (2018)

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, J., Li, L., Peng, H., Yang, Y.: Quantum-secret-sharing scheme based on local distinguishability of orthogonal multiqudit entangled states. Phys. Rev. A 95, 022320 (2017)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hillery, M., Bužek, V., Berthiaume, A.: Quantum secret sharing. Phys. Rev. A 59, 1829 (1999)

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Wiesner, S.: Conjugate coding. ACM SIGACT News 15, 78 (1983)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, Z.Y., Yuan, H., Shi, S.H., Zhang, Z.J.: Three-party qutrit-state sharing. Eur. Phys. J. D 41, 371 (2007)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Cleve, R., Gottesman, D., Lo, H.K.: How to share a quantum secret. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 648 (1999)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsumoto, R.: Unitary reconstruction of secret for stabilizer-based quantum secret sharing. Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 202 (2017)

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lu, H., et al.: Secret sharing of a quantum state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 030501 (2016)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sarvepalli, P.: Nonthreshold quantum secret-sharing schemes in the graph-state formalism. Phys. Rev. A 86, 042303 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gravier, S., Javelle, J., Mhalla, M., Perdrix, S.: On weak odd domination and graph-based quantum secret sharing. Theor. Comput. Sci. 598, 129 (2015)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Diep, D.N., Giang, D.H., Phu, P.H.: Application of quantum Gauss–Jordan elimination code to quantum secret sharing code. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57, 841 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Gao, G., Wang, Y., Wang, D., Ye, L.: Comment on ’Authenticated quantum secret sharing with quantum dialogue based on Bell states’. Phys. Scr. 93, 027002 (2018)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Abulkasim, H., Hamad, S., Elhadad, A.: Reply to Comment on ’Authenticated quantum secret sharing with quantum dialogue based on Bell states’. Phys. Scr. 93, 027001 (2018)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, F., Qin, S.J., Wen, Q.Y.: A quantum secret-sharing protocol with fairness. Phys. Scr. 89, 075104 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lai, H., Xiao, J., Orgun, M.A., Xue, L., Pieprzyk, J.: Quantum direct secret sharing with efficient eavesdropping-check and authentication based on distributed fountain codes. Quantum Inf. Process. 13, 895 (2014)

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Xie, C., Li, L., Qiu, D.: A novel semi-quantum secret sharing scheme of specific bits. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 54, 3819 (2015)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Li, L., Qiu, D., Mateus, P.: Quantum secret sharing with classical Bobs. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 46, 045304 (2013)

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Tsai, C., Hwang, T.: Multi-party quantum secret sharing based on two special entangled states. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 55, 460 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Helwig, W., Cui, W., Latorre, J.I., Riera, A., Lo, H.K.: Absolute maximal entanglement and quantum secret sharing. Phys. Rev. A 86, 052335 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Liao, C.H., Yang, C.W., Hwang, T.: Dynamic quantum secret sharing protocol based on GHZ state. Quantum Inf. Process. 13, 1907 (2014)

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Gao, G.: Improvement of efficient multiparty quantum secret sharing based on bell states and continuous variable operations. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53, 2231 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang, L., Guo, Y., Huang, D.: High-efficient quantum secret sharing with arrangements of lines on two-dimensional planes. Int. J. Internet Protoc. Technol. 8, 116 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang, Z.J., Man, Z.X.: Multiparty quantum secret sharing of classical messages based on entanglement swapping. Phys. Rev. A 72, 022303 (2005)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Massoud, H.D., Elham, F.: A novel and efficient multiparty quantum secret sharing scheme using entangled states. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 55, 1828 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Guo, G.P., Guo, G.C.: Quantum secret sharing without entanglement. Phys. Lett. A 310, 247 (2003)

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Hsu, L.Y., Li, C.M.: Quantum secret sharing using product states. Phys. Rev. A 71, 022321 (2005)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yan, F., Gao, T.: Quantum secret sharing between multiparty and multiparty without entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 72, 012304 (2005)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Han, L.F., Liu, Y.M., Liu, J., Zhang, Z.J.: Multiparty quantum secret sharing of secure direct communication using single photons. Opt. Commun. 281, 2690 (2008)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, Z.J., Li, Y., Man, Z.X.: Multiparty quantum secret sharing. Phys. Rev. A 71, 044301 (2005)

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen, X.B., Niu, X.X., Zhou, X.J., Yang, Y.X.: Multi-party quantum secret sharing with the single-particle quantum state to encode the information. Quantum Inf. Process. 12, 365 (2013)

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang, H., Huang, Y., Fang, X., Gu, B., Fu, D.: High-capacity three-party quantum secret sharing with single photons in both the polarization and the spatial-mode degrees of freedom. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52, 1043 (2013)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang, T.Y., Wen, Q.Y., Chen, X.B., Guo, F.Z., Zhu, F.C.: An efficient and secure multiparty quantum secret sharing scheme based on single photons. Opt. Commun. 281, 6130 (2008)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hao, S.B., Yu, B.: Multiparty quantum secret information sharing in enterprise management based on single qubit with random rotation angle. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 51, 1674 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Muralidharan, S., Panigrahi, P.K.: Perfect teleportation, quantum-state sharing, and superdense coding through a genuinely entangled five-qubit state. Phys. Rev. A 77, 032321 (2008)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Muralidharan, S., Panigrahi, P.K.: Quantum-information splitting using multipartite cluster states. Phys. Rev. A 78, 062333 (2008)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Choudhury, S., Muralidharan, S., Panigrahi, P.K.: Quantum teleportation and state sharing using a genuinely entangled six-qubit state. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 115303 (2009)

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Hou, K., Li, Y.B., Shi, S.H.: Quantum state sharing with a genuinely entangled five-qubit state and Bell-state measurements. Opt. Commun. 283, 1961 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Li, Y.H., Liu, J.C., Nie, Y.Y.: Quantum teleportation and quantum information splitting by using a genuinely entangled six-qubit state. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 49, 2592 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Nie, Y.Y., Li, Y.H., Liu, J.C., Sang, M.H.: Quantum information splitting of an arbitrary three-qubit state by using two four-qubit cluster states. Quantum Inf. Process. 10, 297 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Nie, Y.Y., Li, Y.H., Liu, J.C., Sang, M.H.: Quantum state sharing of an arbitrary three-qubit state by using four sets of W-class states. Opt. Commun. 284, 1457 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Muralidharan, S., Karumanchi, S., Narayanaswamy, S., Srikanth, R., Panigrahi, P.K.: In How Many Ways Can Quantum Information Be Split? arXiv:0907.3532

  50. Tittel, W., Zbinden, H., Gisin, N.: Experimental demonstration of quantum secret sharing. Phys. Rev. A 63, 042301 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Schmid, C., Trojek, P., Bourennane, M., Kurtsiefer, C., Zukowski, M., Weinfurter, H.: Experimental single qubit quantum secret sharing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 230505 (2005)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. Gaertner, S., Kurtsiefer, C., Bourennane, M., Weinfurter, H.: Experimental demonstration of four-party quantum secret sharing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 020503 (2007)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Wei, K.J., Ma, H.Q., Yang, J.H.: Experimental circular quantum secret sharing over telecom fiber network. Opt. Express 21, 16663 (2013)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. IBM—Quantum Network. https://www.research.ibm.com/ibm-q/network/overview/. Accessed 18 July 2019

  55. Boixo, S., et al.: Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices. Nat. Phys. 14, 595–600 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Connover, E.: Google moves toward quantum supremacy with 72-qubit computer. Sci. News 193, 6 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Gibney, E.: Inside Microsoft’s quest for a topological quantum computer. Nat. News (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.20774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Microsoft Quantum Development Kit. https://microsoft.com/quantum (2017). Accessed 18 July 2019

  59. The Future of Quantum Computing is Counted in Qubits. https://newsroom.intel.com/news/future-quantum-computing-counted-qubits/ (2018). Accessed 18 July 2019

  60. Rigetti, C.: The Rigetti 128-qubit chip and what it means for quantum, Medium https://medium.com/rigetti/the-rigetti-128-qubit-chip-and-what-it-means-for-quantum-df757d1b71ea (2018). Accessed 18 July 2019

  61. D-Wave Announces D-Wave 2000Q Quantum Computer and First System Order, press release. https://www.dwavesys.com/press-releases/d-wave%C2%A0announces%C2%A0d-wave-2000q-quantum-computer-and-first-system-order (2017). Accessed 18 July 2019

  62. Neukart, F., Compostella, G., Seidel, C., Von Dollen, D., Yarkoni, S., Parney, B.: Traffic flow optimization using a quantum annealer. Front. ICT 4, 29 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2017.00029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Boyda, E., Basu, S., Ganguly, S., Michaelis, A., Mukhopadhyay, S., Nemani, R.R.: Deploying a quantum annealing processor to detect tree cover in aerial imagery of California. PLoS ONE 12(2), e0172505 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  64. O’Malley, D., Vesselinov, V.V., Alexandrov, B.S., Alexandrov, L.B.: Nonnegative/binary matrix factorization with a D-Wave quantum annealer. PLoS ONE 13(12), e0206653 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Srivastava, R., Choi, I., Cook, T.: The Commercial Prospects of Quantum Computing. Technical report, Networked Quantum Information Technologies (2016)

  66. Gabriel, P.: Quest for qubits. Science 354(6316), 1090–1093 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  67. Cusumano, M.A.: The business of quantum computing. Commun. ACM 61(10), 20–22 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Fedortchenko, S.: A Quantum Teleportation Experiment for Undergraduate Students (2016). arXiv:1607.02398

  69. Sisodia, M., Shukla, A., Thapliyal, K., Pathak, A.: Design and experimental realization of an optimal scheme for teleportation of an n-qubit quantum state. Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 292 (2017)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  70. Alsina, D., Latorre, J.I.: Experimental test of Mermin inequalities on a five-qubit quantum computer. Phys. Rev. A 94, 012314 (2016)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  71. Berta, M., Wehner, S., Wilde, M.M.: Entropic uncertainty and measurement reversibility. New J. Phys. 18, 073004 (2016)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  72. Devitt, S.J.: Performing quantum computing experiments in the cloud. Phys. Rev. A 94, 032329 (2016)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  73. Takita, M., Corcoles, A.D., Magesan, E., Abdo, B., Brink, M., Cross, A., Chow, J.M., Gambetta, J.M.: Demonstration of weight-four parity measurements in the surface code architecture. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 210505 (2016)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  74. Wootton, J.R., Loss, D.: Repetition code of 15 qubits. Phys. Rev. A 97, 052313 (2018)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  75. Ghosh, D., Agarwal, P., Pandey, P., Behera, B.K., Panigrahi, P.K.: Automated error correction in IBM quantum computer and explicit generalization. Quantum Inf. Process. 17, 153 (2018)

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  76. Behera, B.K., Banerjee, A., Panigrahi, P.K.: Experimental realization of quantum cheque using a five-qubit quantum computer. Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 312 (2017)

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  77. Sisodia, M., Shukla, A., Pathak, A.: Experimental realization of nondestructive discrimination of Bell states using a five-qubit quantum computer. Phys. Lett. A 381, 3860 (2017)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  78. Vuillot, C.: Is Error Detection Helpful on IBM 5Q Chips? (2018). arXiv:1705.08957v1

  79. Huang, H.L., Zhao, Y.W., Li, T., Li, F.G., Du, Y.T., Fu, X.Q., Zhang, S., Wang, X., Bao, W.S.: Homomorphic encryption experiments on IBM’s cloud quantum computing platform. Front. Phys. 12, 120305 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  80. Wooton, J.R.: Demonstrating non-Abelian braiding of surface code defects in a five qubit experiment. Quantum Sci. Technol. 2, 015006 (2017)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  81. Li, R., Alvarez-Rodriguez, U., Lamata, L., Solano, E.: Approximate quantum adders with genetic algorithms: an IBM quantum experience. Quantum Meas. Quantum Metrol. 4, 1 (2017)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  82. Deffner, S.: Demonstration of entanglement assisted invariance on IBM’s quantum experience. Heliyon 3, e00444 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  83. Hebenstreit, M., Alsina, D., Latorre, J.I., Kraus, B.: Compressed quantum computation using a remote five-qubit quantum computer. Phys. Rev. A 95, 052339 (2017)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  84. Linke, N.M., Maslov, D., Roetteler, M., Debnath, S., Figgatt, C., Landsman, K.A., Wright, K., Monroe, C.: Experimental comparison of two quantum computing architectures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 3305 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  85. Hillery, M., Ziman, M., Bužek, V., Bieliková, M.: Towards quantum-based privacy and voting. Phys. Lett. A 349, 75–81 (2006)

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  86. Sharma, R.D., De, A.: Quantum voting using single qubits. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 9(42), 032329 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  87. Ghose, S., Kumar, A., Madhok, V., Hamel, A.M.: Multiparty quantum communication using multiqubit entanglement and teleportation. Phys. Res. Int. 2014, 948750 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  88. Tian, J.H., Zhang, J.Z., Li, Y.P.: A voting protocol based on the controlled quantum operation teleportation. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55, 2303 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  89. Thapliyal, K., Sharma, R.D., Pathak, A.: Protocols for quantum binary voting. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 15(1), 1750007 (2017)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  90. Lou, X.: Quantum distributed ballot scheme based on entanglement swapping. In: 10th International Conference on Trust. Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications, IEEE (2011)

  91. Cao, H.J., Ding, L.Y., Jiang, X.L., Li, P.F.: A new proxy electronic voting scheme achieved by six-particle entangled states. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57, 674 (2017)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  92. Borras, A., Plastino, A.R., Batle, J., Zander, C., Casas, M., Plastino, A.: Multiqubit systems: highly entangled states and entanglement distribution. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 40, 13407 (2007)

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  93. Zhang, J.L., Xie, S.C., Zhang, J.Z.: An elaborate secure quantum voting scheme. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56, 3019 (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  94. Xue, P., Zhang, X.: A simple quantum voting scheme with multi-qubit entanglement. Sci. Rep. 7, 7586 (2017)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  95. Karlsson, A., Bourennane, M.: Quantum teleportation using three-particle entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 58, 4394 (1998)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  96. Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., Wootters, W.K.: Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993)

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  97. Wootters, W.K., Zurek, W.H.: A single quantum cannot be cloned. Nature 299, 802–803 (1982)

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  98. Benenti, G., Casati, G., Strini, G.: Principles of Quantum Computation and Information-Volume I: Basic Concepts, p. 118. World scientific, Singapore (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  99. Pathak, A.: Experimental Quantum Mechanics in the Class Room: Testing Basic Ideas of Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Computing Using IBM Quantum Computer (2018). arXiv:1805.06275v1

  100. Altepeter, J.B., James, D.F.V., Kwiat, P.G.: Quantum state tomography. In: Paris, M., Rehácek, J. (eds.) Quantum State Estimation. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 649. Springer, Berlin (2004)

  101. Nielsen, M.A., Chuang, I.L.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, p. 409. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  102. Zhang, J.L., Zhan, J.Z., Xie, S.C.: A choreographed distributed electronic voting scheme. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57, 2676 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  103. Vaccaro, J.A., Spring, J., Chefles, A.: Quantum protocols for anonymous voting and surveying. Phys. Rev. A 75, 012333 (2007)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  104. Sun, X., Wang, Q., Kulicki, P.: A simple voting protocol on quantum blockchain. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 58, 275 (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  105. Zhou, N., Zeng, G., Zeng, W., Zhu, F.: Cross-center quantum identification scheme based on teleportation and entanglement swapping. Opt. Commun. 254, 380 (2005)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  106. Cabello, A.: Quantum key distribution in the Holevo limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5635 (2000)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  107. Banerjee, A., Pathak, A.: Maximally efficient protocols for direct secure quantum communication. Phys. Lett. A 376, 2944–2950 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

D.J. thanks U.G.C., New Delhi, for providing the financial support through BSR fellowship and Athul R.T. for the technical support. B.K.B. acknowledges the financial support of IISER Kolkata. The authors are extremely grateful to IBM team and IBM QE project. The discussions and opinions developed in this paper are only those of the authors and do not reflect the opinions of IBM or IBM Quantum Experience team.

Author information

Author notes

  1. M. Sabir: Deceased on Oct 8, 2019.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi, Kerala, 682022, India

    Dintomon Joy & M. Sabir

  2. Department of Physical Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Mohanpur, West Bengal, 741246, India

    Bikash K. Behera & Prasanta K. Panigrahi

Authors
  1. Dintomon Joy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Sabir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bikash K. Behera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Prasanta K. Panigrahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dintomon Joy.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joy, D., Sabir, M., Behera, B.K. et al. Implementation of quantum secret sharing and quantum binary voting protocol in the IBM quantum computer. Quantum Inf Process 19, 33 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-019-2531-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-019-2531-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation