Exploration of entropic uncertainty relation for two accelerating atoms immersed in a bath of electromagnetic field

Abstract

The uncertainty principle as an elementary theory of quantum mechanics plays an important role in quantum information science. In this paper, we study the dynamics of quantum-memory-assisted entropic uncertainty relation for two accelerating atoms coupled with a bath of fluctuating electromagnetic field. The master equation that the system evolution obeys is firstly derived. We find that the mixedness is bound up with the entropic uncertainty. For equilibrium state, the tightness of uncertainty vanishes. For the initial maximum entangled state, the tightness of uncertainty experiences a slight increase and then declines to zero with evolution time. It is found that the greater acceleration makes the uncertainty faster reach a maximum value and stable value. For a fixed acceleration, the uncertainty with different two-atom separations converges to a fixed value. Furthermore, we utilize weak measurement reversal to manipulate the entropic uncertainty. Our explorations may suggest a method of probing entanglement, acceleration effect and vacuum fluctuation effect with entropic uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. 1.

    Heisenberg, W.: Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik. Z. Phys. 43, 172 (1927)

    MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Coles, P.J., Berta, M., Tomamichel, M., Wehner, S.: Entropic uncertainty relations and their applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015002 (2017)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kennard, E.H.: Zur Quantenmechanik einfacher Bewegungstypen. Z. Phys. 44, 326 (1927)

    MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Robertson, H.P.: The uncertainty principle. Phys. Rev. 34, 163 (1929)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Deutsch, D.: Uncertainty in quantum measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 631 (1983)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kraus, K.: Complementary observables and uncertainty relations. Phys. Rev. D 35, 3070 (1987)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Maassen, H., Uffnk, J.B.M.: Generalized entropic uncertainty relations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1103 (1988)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bialynicki-Birula, I.: Formulation of the uncertainty relations in terms of the Rényi entropies. Phys. Rev. A 74, 052101 (2006)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Coles, P.J., Piani, M.: Improved entropic uncertainty relations and information exclusion relations. Phys. Rev. A 89, 022112 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Renes, J.M., Boileau, J.C.: Conjectured strong complementary information tradeoff. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 020402 (2009)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Berta, M., Christandl, M., Colbeck, R., Renes, J.M., Renner, R.: The uncertainty principle in the presence of quantum memory. Nat. Phys. 6, 659 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kurzyk, D., Pawela, Ł., Puchała, Z.: Conditional entropic uncertainty relations for Tsallis entropies. Quantum Inf. Process. 17, 193 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hu, M.L., Fan, H.: Quantum-memory-assisted entropic uncertainty principle, teleportation, and entanglement witness in structured reservoirs. Phys. Rev. A 86, 032338 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zou, H.M., et al.: The quantum entropic uncertainty relation and entanglement witness in the two-atom system coupling with the non-Markovian environments. Phys. Scr. 89, 115101 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hu, M.L., Fan, H.: Competition between quantum correlations in the quantum-memory-assisted entropic uncertainty relation. Phys. Rev. A 87, 022314 (2013)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hu, M.L., Fan, H.: Upper bound and shareability of quantum discord based on entropic uncertainty relations. Phys. Rev. A 88, 014105 (2013)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Pati, A.K., et al.: Quantum discord and classical correlation can tighten the uncertainty principle in the presence of quantum memory. Phys. Rev. A 86, 042105 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mondal, D., Pati, A.K.: Quantum speed limit for mixed states using an experimentally realizable metric. Phys. Lett. A 380, 1395 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Pires, D.P., Cianciaruso, M., Céleri, L.C., Adesso, G., Soares-Pinto, D.O.: Generalized geometric quantum speed limits. Phys. Rev. X 6, 021031 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hall, M.J.W., Wiseman, H.M.: Heisenberg-style bounds for arbitrary estimates of shift parameters including prior information. New J. Phys. 14, 033040 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Tomamichel, M., Renner, R.: Uncertainty relation for smooth entropies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 110506 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Coles, P.J., Colbeck, R., Yu, L., Zwolak, M.: Uncertainty relations from simple entropic properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 210405 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Berta, M., Wehner, S., Wilde, M.M.: Entropic uncertainty and measurement reversibility. New J. Phys. 18, 073004 (2016)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Adabi, F., Salimi, S., Haseli, S.: Tightening the entropic uncertainty bound in the presence of quantum memory. Phys. Rev. A 93, 062123 (2016)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Liu, S., Mu, L.Z., Fan, H.: Entropic uncertainty relations for multiple measurements. Phys. Rev. A 91, 042133 (2015)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Xu, Z.Y., Yang, W.L., Feng, M.: Quantum-memory-assisted entropic uncertainty relation under noise. Phys. Rev. A 86, 012113 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wang, D., et al.: Entropic uncertainty relations for Markovian and non-Markovian processes under a structured bosonic reservoir. Sci. Rep. 7, 1066 (2017)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Huang, Z.M.: Quantum-memory-assisted entropic uncertainty in spin models with Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction. Laser Phys. Lett. 15, 025203 (2018)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wang, D., et al.: Quantum-memory-assisted entropic uncertainty relation in a Heisenberg XYZ chain with an inhomogeneous magnetic field. Laser Phys. Lett. 14, 065203 (2017)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Huang, A.J., et al.: Exploring entropic uncertainty relation in the Heisenberg XX model with inhomogeneous magnetic field. Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 204 (2017)

    MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hu, J.W., Yu, H.W.: Entanglement dynamics for uniformly accelerated two-level atoms. Phys. Rev. A 91, 012327 (2015)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Yang, Y.Q., Hu, J.W., Yu, H.W.: Entanglement dynamics for uniformly accelerated two-level atoms coupled with electromagnetic vacuum fluctuations. Phys. Rev. A 94, 032337 (2016)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Jia, L.J., Tian, Z.H., Jing, J.L.: Entropic uncertainty relation in de Sitter space. Ann. Phys. 353, 37 (2015)

    MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zhang, S.Y., Fang, M.F., Yu, M.: Controlling of entropic uncertainty in qubits system under the generalized amplitude damping channel via weak measurements. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55, 1824 (2016)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wang, D., et al.: Entropic uncertainty for spin-1/2 XXX chains in the presence of inhomogeneous magnetic fields and its steering via weak measurement reversals. Laser Phys. Lett. 14, 095204 (2017)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Huang, A.J., Shi, J.D., Wang, D., Ye, L.: Steering quantum-memory-assisted entropic uncertainty under unital and nonunital noises via filtering operations. Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 46 (2017)

    MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Yu, M., Fang, M.F.: Controlling the quantum-memory-assisted entropic uncertainty relation by quantum-jump-based feedback control in dissipative environments. Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 213 (2017)

    MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Peters, N.A., Wei, T.C., Kwiat, P.G.: Mixed state sensitivity of several quantum information benchmarks. Phys. Rev. A 70, 052309 (2004)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Sun, Q., Al-Amri, M., Davidovich, L., Suhail Zubairy, M.: Reversing entanglement change by a weak measurement. Phys. Rev. A 82, 052323 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Huang, Z.M., Zhang, C.: Protecting quantum correlation from correlated amplitude damping channel. Braz. J. Phys. 47, 400 (2017)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Huang, Z.M., Situ, H.Z.: Optimal protection of quantum coherence in noisy environment. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56, 503 (2017)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Huang, Z.M., Rong, Z.B., Zou, X.F., Situ, H.Z., Zhao, L.H.: Protecting qutrit quantum coherence. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56, 2540 (2017)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Gorini, V., Kossakowski, A., Surdarshan, E.C.G.: Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems. J. Math. Phys. 17, 821 (1976)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Lindblad, G.: On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups. Commun. Math. Phys. 48, 119 (1976)

    MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Breuer, H.-P., Petruccione, F.: The Theory of Open Quantum Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Huang, Z.M., Qiu, D.W., Mateus, P.: Geometry and dynamics of one-norm geometric quantum discord. Quantum Inf. Process. 15, 301 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Ali, M., Rau, A.R.P., Alber, G.: Quantum discord for two-qubit X states. Phys. Rev. A 81, 042105 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Chen, Q., Zhang, C., Yu, X., Yi, X.X., Oh, C.H.: Quantum discord of two-qubit X states. Phys. Rev. A 84, 042313 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Li, B., Wang, Z.X., Fei, S.M.: Quantum discord and geometry for a class of two-qubit states. Phys. Rev. A 83, 022321 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Jafari, R., Kargarian, M., Langari, A., Siahatgar, M.: Phase diagram and entanglement of the Ising model with Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction. Phys. Rev. B. 78, 214414 (2008)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Ma, F.W., Liu, S.X., Kong, X.M.: Quantum entanglement and quantum phase transition in the XY model with staggered Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction. Phys. Rev. A 84, 042302 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Song, X.K., Wu, T., Ye, L.: Renormalization of quantum discord and Bell nonlocality in the XXZ model with Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction. Ann. Phys. 349, 220 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Huang, Z.M.: Dynamics of quantum correlation and coherence in de Sitter universe. Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 207 (2017)

    MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Huang, Z.M., Tian, Z.H.: Dynamics of quantum entanglement in de Sitter spacetime and thermal Minkowski spacetime. Nucl. Phys. B 923, 458 (2017)

    MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Huang, Z.M., Tian, Z.H.: Dynamics of quantum correlation in de Sitter spacetime. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 86, 094003 (2017)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Huang, Z.M., Zhang, C., Zhang, W., Zhao, L.H.: Equivalence of quantum resource measures for X states. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56, 3615 (2017)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Huang, Z.M., Situ, H.Z.: Dynamics of quantum correlation and coherence for two atoms coupled with a bath of fluctuating massless scalar field. Ann. Phys. 377, 484 (2017)

    MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Huang, Z.M.: Dynamics of quantum correlation of atoms immersed in a thermal quantum scalar fields with a boundary. Quantum Inf. Process. 17, 221 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Huang, Z.M., Situ, H.Z.: Quantum coherence behaviors of fermionic system in non-inertial frame. Quantum Inf. Process. 17, 95 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Huang, Z.M., Ye, Y.Y., Luo, D.R.: Simultaneous dense coding affected by fluctuating massless scalar field. Quantum Inf. Process. 17, 101 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Huang, Z.M.: Dynamics of entropic uncertainty for atoms immersed in thermal fluctuating massless scalar field. Quantum Inf. Process 17, 73 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Huang, Z.M.: Protecting quantum Fisher information in curved space–time. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133, 101 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Wang, G.Y., Li, T., Deng, F.G.: High-efficiency atomic entanglement concentration for quantum communication network assisted by cavity QED. Quantum Inf. Process. 14, 1305 (2015)

    MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Yang, Z.G., Wu, T.T., Liu, J.M.: Remote state preparation via photonic Faraday rotation in low-Q cavities. Acta Phys. Sin. 65, 020302 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Unruh, W.G.: Notes on black-hole evaporation. Phys. Rev. D 14, 870 (1976)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61871205), the Innovation Project of Department of Education of Guangdong Province (2017KTSCX180), the Jiangmen Science and Technology Plan Project for Basic and Theoretical Research (2018JC01010), the Young Science and Technology Talent Growth Fund Project of Education Department of Guizhou Province of China (Qian Jiao He KY Zi[2018]426), the Major Special Fund Project of Research and Innovation for Qiannan Normal university for Nationalities of China (QNSY2018BS015), the Industrial Technology Foundation of Qiannan State of China (Qiannan Ke He Gong Zi (2017) 9 Hao) and the Scientific Research Foundation for High-level Talents of Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities (qnsyrc201716).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiming Huang.

Appendices

Appendix A: Kossakowski–Lindblad master equation

The Kossakowski–Lindblad master equation that governs the atom evolution is [43,44,45]

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial \rho (\tau )}{\partial \tau }=-i[H_{\text {eff}},\rho (\tau )]+{\mathcal {L}}[\rho (\tau )], \end{aligned}$$
(19)

where

$$\begin{aligned} H_{\text {eff}}=H_{S}-\frac{i}{2}\sum _{\alpha ,\beta =1}^{2}\sum _{i,j=1}^{3}H_{ij}^{(\alpha \beta )}\sigma _{i}^{(\alpha )}\sigma _{j}^{(\beta )}, \end{aligned}$$
(20)

and

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathcal {L}}[\rho ]=\frac{1}{2}\sum _{\alpha ,\beta =1}^{2}\sum _{i,j=1}^{3}C^{(\alpha \beta )}_{ij}\left[ 2\sigma _{j}^{(\beta )}\rho \sigma _{i}^{(\alpha )}-\sigma _{i}^{(\alpha )}\sigma _{j}^{(\beta )}\rho -\rho \sigma _{i}^{(\alpha )}\sigma _{j}^{(\beta )}\right] . \end{aligned}$$
(21)

\(C_{ij}^{(\alpha \beta )}\) and \(H_{ij}^{(\alpha \beta )}\) are determined by the electromagnetic field correlation functions:

$$\begin{aligned} G^{(\alpha \beta )}_{mn}(\tau -\tau ') =\langle E_{m}(\tau ,{\mathbf {x}}_{\alpha }) E_{n}(\tau ',{\mathbf {x}}_\beta ) \rangle \;. \end{aligned}$$
(22)

\({\mathcal {G}}^{(\alpha \beta )}_{mn}(\omega )\) and \({\mathcal {K}}^{(\alpha \beta )}_{mn}(\omega )\) denote Fourier and Hilbert transforms, respectively, defined as

$$\begin{aligned}&{\mathcal {G}}^{(\alpha \beta )}_{mn}(\lambda )=\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }\mathrm{{d}}{\varDelta }\tau e^{i \lambda {\varDelta }\tau }G^{(\alpha \beta )}_{mn}({\varDelta }\tau ), \end{aligned}$$
(23)
$$\begin{aligned}&{\mathcal {K}}^{(\alpha \beta )}_{mn}(\lambda )=\frac{P}{\pi i}\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }\mathrm{{d}}\omega \frac{{\mathcal {G}}^{(\alpha \beta )}_{mn}(\omega )}{\omega -\lambda }, \end{aligned}$$
(24)

where P is the principal value. The Kossakowski matrix \(C_{ij}^{(\alpha \beta )}\) can be written explicitly as

$$\begin{aligned} C_{ij}^{(\alpha \beta )} = A^{(\alpha \beta )}\delta _{ij} -iB^{(\alpha \beta )}\epsilon _{ijk}\,\delta _{3k} -A^{(\alpha \beta )}\delta _{3i}\,\delta _{3j} , \end{aligned}$$
(25)

where

$$\begin{aligned} A^{(\alpha \beta )} ={\frac{1}{4}}\,[\,\mathcal{G}^{(\alpha \beta )}(\omega ) +{{{\mathcal {G}}}}^{(\alpha \beta )}(-\omega )] ,\nonumber \\ B^{(\alpha \beta )} ={\frac{1}{4}}\,[\,\mathcal{G}^{(\alpha \beta )}(\omega ) -{{{\mathcal {G}}}}^{(\alpha \beta )}(-\omega )] , \end{aligned}$$
(26)

with

$$\begin{aligned} {{{\mathcal {G}}}}^{(\alpha \beta )}(\omega ) =\sum _{m,n=1}^3\, d^{(\alpha )}_m d^{(\beta )*}_n\, {{\mathcal {G}}}^{(\alpha \beta )}_{mn}(\omega ) . \end{aligned}$$
(27)

Similarly, \(H^{(\alpha \beta )}_{ij}\) can be obtained by replacing \({{\mathcal {G}}}^{(\alpha \beta )}_{mn}\) with \({{\mathcal {K}}}^{(\alpha \beta )}_{mn}\) in the above expressions.

Appendix B: The relative calculation of correlation function

Substituting Eq. (8) into Eq. (9), the correlation functions of accelerating two-atom system can be computed [32]:

$$\begin{aligned} G^{(11)}_{mn}(x,x')=G^{(22)}_{mn}(x,x') =\frac{a^4}{16\pi ^2} \frac{1}{\sinh ^4\left( \frac{a{\varDelta }\tau }{2}-i\epsilon \right) }\delta _{mn} , \end{aligned}$$
(28)

and

$$\begin{aligned} G^{(\alpha \beta )}_{mn}(x,x') =&\frac{a^4}{16\pi ^2}\frac{1}{ \left[ \sinh ^2 \left( \frac{a{\varDelta }\tau }{2}-i\epsilon \right) -{\frac{a^2l^2}{4}} \right] ^3} \left\{ [\delta _{mn}+al{\varepsilon _{\alpha \beta 3}}(\textit{q}_{m} \textit{k}_{n}-\textit{q}_{n}{} \textit{k}_{m})]{\sinh ^2 \frac{a{\varDelta }\tau }{2}} \right. \end{aligned}$$
(29)
$$\begin{aligned}&+\,\frac{a^2l^2}{4}\left[ (\delta _{mn}-2\textit{q}_{m} \textit{q}_{n}){\cosh ^2 \frac{a{\varDelta }\tau }{2}} \left. +(\delta _{mn}-2\textit{q}_{m}{} \textit{q}_{n}- 2\textit{k}_{m}{} \textit{k}_{n}){\sinh ^2 \frac{a{\varDelta }\tau }{2}}\right] \right\} , \end{aligned}$$
(30)

for \(\alpha \ne \beta \), where \({\varDelta }\tau =\tau -\tau '\), \({\mathbf {k}}=(1, 0, 0)\) and \({\mathbf {q}}=(0, 0, 1)\). According to Eq. (23), the Fourier transforms of the above field correlation function are [32]

$$\begin{aligned} {{\mathcal {G}}}^{(11)}_{mn}(\lambda )=\mathcal{G}^{(22)}_{mn}(\lambda )=\frac{1}{6\pi }{\lambda }^3 \left( 1+\coth \frac{\pi \lambda }{a} \right) f^{(11)}(\lambda ,a) \delta _{mn}, \end{aligned}$$
(31)

where

$$\begin{aligned} f^{(11)}(\lambda ,a)=1+\frac{a^2}{\lambda ^2}, \end{aligned}$$
(32)

and

$$\begin{aligned} {{\mathcal {G}}}^{(\alpha \beta )}_{mn}(\lambda )=\frac{1}{6\pi } {\lambda }^3 \left( 1+\coth \frac{\pi \lambda }{a} \right) f^{(\alpha \beta )}_{mn}(\lambda ,a,l), \end{aligned}$$
(33)

for \(\alpha \ne \beta \),

$$\begin{aligned} f^{(12)}_{11}(\lambda ,a,l)=&f^{(21)}_{11}(\lambda ,a,l)=\frac{12}{{{\lambda ^3}{l^3}{{(4 + {a^2}{l^2})}^{5/2}}}}\nonumber \\&\times \left\{ 2\lambda l(1 + {a^2}{l^2}){(4 + {a^2}{l^2})^{1/2}}\cos \left( \frac{{2\lambda }}{a}{\sinh ^{ - 1}}\frac{{al}}{2} \right) \right. \nonumber \\&\left. -\,[4-4{\lambda ^2}{l^2} + {a^2}{l^2}(2-{\lambda ^2}{l^2}+{a^2}{l^2})]\sin \left( \frac{{2\lambda }}{a}{\sinh ^{-1}}\frac{{al}}{2} \right) \right\} , \end{aligned}$$
(34)
$$\begin{aligned} f^{(12)}_{22}(\lambda ,a,l) =&f^{(21)}_{22}(\lambda ,a,l)=\frac{3}{{{\lambda ^3}{l^3}{{(4 + {a^2}{l^2})}^{3/2}}}}\nonumber \\&\times \left[ \lambda l(2 + {a^2}{l^2}){(4 + {a^2}{l^2})^{1/2}}\cos \left( \frac{{2\lambda }}{a}{\sinh ^{ - 1}}\frac{{al}}{2} \right) \right. \nonumber \\&\left. +\,(-4+4{\lambda ^2}{l^2} + {a^2}{\lambda ^2}{l^4})\sin \left( \frac{{2\lambda }}{a}{\sinh ^{-1}}\frac{{al}}{2} \right) \right] , \end{aligned}$$
(35)
$$\begin{aligned} f^{(12)}_{33}(\lambda ,a,l) =&f^{(21)}_{33}(\lambda ,a,l)=-\frac{3}{{{\lambda ^3}{l^3}{{(4 + {a^2}{l^2})}^{5/2}}}}\nonumber \\&\times \left\{ \lambda l(16 + 2{a^2}{l^2}+{a^4}{l^4}){(4 + {a^2}{l^2})^{1/2}}\cos \left( \frac{{2\lambda }}{a}{\sinh ^{ - 1}}\frac{{al}}{2} \right) \right. \nonumber \\&\left. +\,[-32+{a^4}{\lambda ^2}{l^6} + 4{a^2}{l^2}(-5+{\lambda ^2}{l^2})]\sin \left( \frac{{2\lambda }}{a}{\sinh ^{-1}}\frac{{al}}{2} \right) \right\} , \end{aligned}$$
(36)
$$\begin{aligned} f^{(12)}_{13}(\lambda ,a,l) =&-f^{(12)}_{31}(\lambda ,a,l)=-f^{(21)}_{13}(\lambda ,a,l)\nonumber \\ =&f^{(21)}_{31}(\lambda ,a,l)=-\frac{6a}{{{\lambda ^3}{l^2}{{(4 + {a^2}{l^2})}^{5/2}}}}\nonumber \\&\times \left\{ \lambda l(-2 + {a^2}{l^2}){(4 + {a^2}{l^2})^{1/2}}\cos \left( \frac{{2\lambda }}{a}{\sinh ^{ - 1}}\frac{{al}}{2} \right) \right. \nonumber \\&\left. +\,[4+4{\lambda ^2}{l^2} + {a^2}{l^2}(4+{\lambda ^2}{l^2})]\sin \left( \frac{{2\lambda }}{a}{\sinh ^{-1}}\frac{{al}}{2} \right) \right\} , \end{aligned}$$
(37)

with other components being zero. In this article, assume that the magnitudes of the electric dipoles of the atoms are the same, i.e., \(|{\mathbf {d}}^{(1)}|=|{\mathbf {d}}^{(2)}|=|{\mathbf {d}}|\), but the orientations may be different. In the interaction representation, the first item of the evolution master equation (19) vanishes. According to Eqs. (26) and (27), we can obtain the coefficients \(C_{ij}^{(\alpha \beta )}\) (25):

$$\begin{aligned}&C_{ij}^{(11)}=C_{ij}^{(22)}=A_1\,\delta _{ij}-iB_1\epsilon _{ijk}\,\delta _{3k} -A_1\delta _{3i}\,\delta _{3j} , \end{aligned}$$
(38)
$$\begin{aligned}&C_{ij}^{(12)}=C_{ij}^{(21)}=A_2\,\delta _{ij}-iB_2\epsilon _{ijk}\,\delta _{3k} -A_2\delta _{3i}\,\delta _{3j}, \end{aligned}$$
(39)

where

$$\begin{aligned}&A_1=\frac{{\varGamma }}{4} f^{(11)}(\omega ,a)\coth {\frac{\pi \omega }{a}} ,\quad A_2=\frac{{\varGamma }}{4} \sum _{i,j=1}^3 f^{(12)}_{ij}(\omega ,a,l){\hat{d}}^{(1)}_i{\hat{d}}^{(2)*}_j\coth {\frac{\pi \omega }{a}} ,\nonumber \\&B_1=\frac{{\varGamma }}{4} f^{(11)}(\omega ,a) ,\quad B_2=\frac{{\varGamma }}{4} \sum _{i,j=1}^3 f^{(12)}_{ij}(\omega ,a,l){\hat{d}}^{(1)}_i{\hat{d}}^{(2)*}_j , \end{aligned}$$
(40)

with \({\varGamma }= \omega ^3 |{\mathbf {d}}|^2 /3\pi \) being the spontaneous emission rate and \({\hat{d}}^{(\alpha )}_{i}\) being a unit vector defined as \({\hat{d}}^{(\alpha )}_{i}=d^{(\alpha )}_{i}/|{\mathbf {d}}|\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Z., Situ, H. Exploration of entropic uncertainty relation for two accelerating atoms immersed in a bath of electromagnetic field. Quantum Inf Process 18, 38 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-018-2151-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Entropic uncertainty
  • Mixedness
  • Dynamics
  • Fluctuating electromagnetic field
  • Weak measurement reversal