Skip to main content
Log in

Monogamy properties of qubit systems

  • Published:
Quantum Information Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate monogamy relations related to quantum entanglement for n-qubit quantum systems. General monogamy inequalities are presented to the \(\beta \hbox {th}\,(\beta \in (0,2))\) power of concurrence, negativity and the convex-roof extended negativity, as well as the \(\beta \hbox {th}\,(\beta \in (0,\sqrt{2}))\) power of entanglement of formation. These monogamy relations are complementary to the existing ones with different regions of parameter \(\beta \). In additions, new monogamy relations are also derived which include the existing ones as special cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mintert, F., Kuś, M., Buchleitner, A.: Concurrence of mixed bipartite quantum states in arbitrary dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 167902 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, K., Albeverio, S., Fei, S.M.: Concurrence of arbitrary dimensional bipartite quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 040504 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Breuer, H.P.: Optimal entanglement criterion for mixed quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 080501 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. de Vicente, J.I.: Lower bounds on concurrence and separability conditions. Phys. Rev. A 75, 052320 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, C.J., Zhang, Y.S., Zhang, S., Guo, G.C.: Optimal entanglement witnesses based on local orthogonal observables. Phys. Rev. A 76, 012334 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nielsen, M.A., Chuang, I.L.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Pawlowski, M.: Security proof for cryptographic protocols based only on the monogamy of Bell’s inequality violations. Phys. Rev. A 82, 032313 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Koashi, M., Winter, A.: Monogamy of quantum entanglement and other correlations. Phys. Rev. A 69, 022309 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bai, Y.K., Ye, M.Y., Wang, Z.D.: Entanglement monogamy and entanglement evolution in multipartite systems. Phys. Rev. A 80, 044301 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Osborne, T.J., Verstraete, F.: General monogamy inequality for bipartite qubit entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 220503 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bai, Y.K., Xu, Y.F., Wang, Z.D.: General monogamy relation for the entanglement of formation in multiqubit systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 100503 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Coffman, V., Kundu, J., Wootters, W.K.: Distributed entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 61, 052306 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu, X.N., Fei, S.M.: Entanglement monogamy relations of qubit systems. Phys. Rev. A 90, 024304 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vidal, G., Werner, R.F.: Computable measure of entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 65, 032314 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. He, H., Vidal, G.: Disentangling theorem and monogamy for entanglement negativity. Phys. Rev. A 91, 012339 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jin, Z.X., Li, J., Li, T., Fei, S.M.: Tighter monogamy relations in multiqubit systems. Phys. Rev. A 97, 032336 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Uhlmann, A.: Fidelity and concurrence of conjugated states. Phys. Rev. A 62, 032307 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rungta, P., Bužek, V.: Universal state inversion and concurrence in arbitrary dimensions. Phys. Rev. A 64, 042315 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Albeverio, S., Fei, S.M.: A note on invariants and entanglements. J. Opt. B Quantum Semiclass Opt. 3, 223 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Acin, A., Andrianov, A., Costa, L., Jane, E., Latorre, J.I., Tarrach, R.: Generalized schmidt decomposition and classification of three-quantum-bit states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1560 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gao, X.H., Fei, S.M.: Estimation of concurrence for multipartite mixed states. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 159, 71 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bennett, C.H., DiVincenzo, D.P., Smolin, J.A., Wootters, W.K.: Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee, S., Chi, D.P., Oh, S.D., Kim, J.: Convex-roof extended negativity as an entanglement measure for bipartite quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A 68, 062304 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bennett, C.H., Bernstein, H.J., Popescu, S., Schumacher, B.: Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations. Phys. Rev. A 53, 2046 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by NSFC under numbers 11675113, 11605083, and Beijing Municipal Commission of Education (KM201810011009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xue-Na Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, XN., Fei, SM. Monogamy properties of qubit systems. Quantum Inf Process 18, 23 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-018-2136-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-018-2136-y

Keywords

Navigation