Quantum Information Processing

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 1349–1360 | Cite as

Beyond complete positivity

Article

Abstract

We provide a general and consistent formulation for linear subsystem quantum dynamical maps, developed from a minimal set of postulates, primary among which is a relaxation of the usual, restrictive assumption of uncorrelated initial system-bath states. We describe the space of possibilities admitted by this formulation, namely that, far from being limited to only completely positive (CP) maps, essentially any \({\mathbb {C}}\)-linear, Hermiticity-preserving, trace-preserving map can arise as a legitimate subsystem dynamical map from a joint unitary evolution of a system coupled to a bath. The price paid for this added generality is a trade-off between the set of admissible initial states and the allowed set of joint system-bath unitary evolutions. As an application, we present a simple example of a non-CP map constructed as a subsystem dynamical map that violates some fundamental inequalities in quantum information theory, such as the quantum data processing inequality.

Keywords

Complete positivity Quantum maps Non-completely positive dynamics Quantum subsystem dynamics 

Supplementary material

11128_2015_1228_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (78 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 78 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Breuer, H.-P., Petruccione, F.: The Theory of Open Quantum Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stinespring, W.F.: Positive functions on \({C}^{*}\)-algebras. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 6(2), 211–216 (1955)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kraus, K.: States, Effects, and Operations. Springer, Berlin (1983)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    As a reminder, if \({\cal H}\) and \({\cal K}\) are Hilbert spaces, \({\cal R}\subset {\cal B}({\cal H})\) is a \({\mathbb{C}}\)-linear subspace spanned by states, and \(F:{\cal R}\rightarrow {\cal B}({\cal K})\) is \({\mathbb{C}}\)-linear, then \(F\) is completely positive if \(F\otimes \text{ id } :{\cal R}\otimes {\cal B}({\cal H}_{\text{ W }}) \rightarrow {\cal B}({\cal K})\otimes {\cal B}({\cal H}_{\text{ W }})\) is a positive map for all finite dimensional \({\cal H}_{\text{ W }}\) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rodríguez-Rosario, C.A., Modi, K., Kuah, A., Shaji, A., Sudarshan, E.C.G.: Completely positive maps and classical correlations. J. Phys. A 41(20), 205301 (2008)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shabani, A., Lidar, D.A.: Vanishing quantum discord is necessary and sufficient for completely positive maps. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102(10), 100402 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rebentrost, P., Chakraborty, R., Aspuru-Guzik, A.: Non-Markovian quantum jumps in excitonic energy transfer. J. Chem. Phys. 131(18), 184102 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Witzel, W.M., Das Sarma, S.: Quantum theory for electron spin decoherence induced by nuclear spin dynamics in semiconductor quantum computer architectures: spectral diffusion of localized electron spins in the nuclear solid-state environment. Phys. Rev. B 74, 035322 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu, B.-H., Li, L., Huang, Y.-F., Li, C.-F., Guo, G.-C., Laine, E.-M., Breuer, H.-P., Piilo, J.: Experimental control of the transition from Markovian to non-Markovian dynamics of open quantum systems. Nat. Phys. 7(12), 931–934 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Štelmachovič, P., Bužek, V.: Dynamics of open quantum systems initially entangled with environment: beyond the Kraus representation. Phys. Rev. A 64, 062106 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salgado, D., Sanchez-Gomez, J.L.: Comment on “dynamics of open quantum systems initially entangled with environment: beyond the kraus representation” [pra 64, 062106 (2001)]. arXiv:quant-ph/0211164 (2002)
  12. 12.
    Hayashi, H., Kimura, G., Ota, Y.: Kraus representation in the presence of initial correlations. Phys. Rev. A 67, 062109 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jordan, T.F., Shaji, A., Sudarshan, E.C.G.: Dynamics of initially entangled open quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A 70, 052110 (2004)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Salgado, D., Sánchez-Gómez, J.L., Ferrero, M.: Evolution of any finite open quantum system always admits a Kraus-type representation, although it is not always completely positive. Phys. Rev. A 70(5), 054102 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shaji, A., Sudarshan, E.C.G.: Who’s afraid of not completely positive maps? Phys. Lett. A 341(1–4), 48–54 (2005)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carteret, H.A., Terno, D.R., Życzkowski, K.: Dynamics beyond completely positive maps: some properties and applications. Phys. Rev. A 77, 042113 (2008)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shabani, A., Lidar, D.A.: Maps for general open quantum systems and a theory of linear quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. A 80(1), 012309 (2009)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rodríguez-Rosario, C.A., Modi, K., Aspuru-Guzik, A.: Linear assignment maps for correlated system-environment states. Phys. Rev. A 81(1), 012313 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Devi, A.R.U., Rajagopal, A.K., Sudha, : Open-system quantum dynamics with correlated initial states, not completely positive maps, and non-Markovianity. Phys. Rev. A 83, 022109 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Modi, K., Rodríguez-Rosario, C.A., Aspuru-Guzik, A.: Positivity in the presence of initial system-environment correlation. Phys. Rev. A 86, 064102 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brodutch, A., Datta, A., Modi, K., Rivas, Á., Rodríguez-Rosario, C.A.: Vanishing quantum discord is not necessary for completely positive maps. Phys. Rev. A 87, 042301 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McCracken, J.M.: Hamiltonian composite dynamics can almost always lead to negative reduced dynamics. Phys. Rev. A 88, 022103 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McCracken, J.M.: Quantum channel negativity as a measure of system-bath coupling and correlation. Phys. Rev. A 88, 032103 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Buscemi, F.: Complete positivity, Markovianity, and the quantum data-processing inequality, in the presence of initial system-environment correlations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140502 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tong, D.M.: Completely positive maps within the framework of direct-sum decomposition of state space. Phys. Rev. A 90, 012305 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dominy, J.M., Shabani, A., Lidar, D.A.: A general framework for complete positivity. Quantum Inf. Process. 15(1), 465–494 (2016)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nielsen, M.A., Chuang, I.L.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England (2000)MATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mark Wilde, M.: Quantum Information Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambride, UK (2013)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kraus, K.: General state changes in quantum theory. Ann. Phys. 64(2), 311–335 (1971)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gorini, V., Kossakowski, A., Sudarshan, E.C.G.: Completely positive dynamical semigroups of n-level systems. J. Math. Phys. 17(5), 821–825 (1976)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lindblad, G.: On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups. Commun. Math. Phys. 48, 119–130 (1976)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Alicki, R., Lendi, K.: Quantum Dynamical Semigroups and Applications. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 286. Springer, Berlin (1987)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Breuer, H.-P., Laine, E.-M., Piilo, J.: Measure for the degree of non-Markovian behavior of quantum processes in open systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 210401 (2009)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Laine, E.-M., Piilo, J., Breuer, H.-P.: Measure for the non-Markovianity of quantum processes. Phys. Rev. A 81, 062115 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Breuer, H.-P.: Foundations and measures of quantum non-Markovianity. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 45(15), 154001 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rodríguez-Rosario, C.A., Modi, K., Mazzola, L., Aspuru-Guzik, A.: Unification of witnessing initial system-environment correlations and witnessing non-Markovianity. EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 99(2), 20010 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bylicka, B., Chruściński, D., Maniscalco, S.: Non-markovianity and reservoir memory of quantum channels: a quantum information theory perspective. Sci. Rep. 4, 5720 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wolf, M.M., Eisert, J., Cubitt, T.S., Cirac, J.I.: Assessing non-Markovian quantum dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 150402 (2008)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Preskill, J.: Quantum Computation Lecture Notes Ch. 3: Foundations of Quantum Theory II: Measurement and Evolution. http://www.theory.caltech.edu/people/preskill/ph229/notes/chap3.pdf (1998)
  40. 40.
    Pechukas, P.: Reduced dynamics need not be completely positive. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73(8), 1060–1062 (1994)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nonlinear maps might also arise if one considers a nonconvex set of admissible initial system-bath states. This is developed further in [26], but a detailed analysis of the nonlinear case remains to be doneGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Alicki, R.: Comment on reduced dynamics need not be completely positive. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75(16), 3020–3020 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pechukas, P.: Pechukas replies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75(16), 3021–3021 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fonseca Romero, K.M., Talkner, P., Hänggi, P.: Is the dynamics of open quantum systems always linear? Phys. Rev. A 69, 052109 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Note that this formulation includes no consideration as to how or why the initial state came to be in \({\cal D}_{\text{ SB }}\cap {\cal V}\); it only models how the subsystem state changes from this point forward. If one wishes to also model state preparation or other prior evolution, the map(s) representing those prior steps should be precomposed with \(\Psi _{U}^{{\cal V}}\) (and will also strongly influence the choice of \({\cal V}\)) [42]Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Takai, H., Yamada, H.: A note on the dilation theorems. Proc. Jpn. Acad. 48(4), 216–220 (1972)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Schäffer, J.J.: On unitary dilations of contractions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 6(2), 322 (1955)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Breuer, H.-P., Kappler, B., Petruccione, F.: Stochastic wave-function method for non-Markovian quantum master equations. Phys. Rev. A 59, 1633–1643 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Breuer, H.-P.: Genuine quantum trajectories for non-Markovian processes. Phys. Rev. A 70, 012106 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Budini, A.A.: Embedding non-Markovian quantum collisional models into bipartite Markovian dynamics. Phys. Rev. A 88, 032115 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hush, M.R., Lesanovsky, I., Garrahan, J.P.: Generic map from non-Lindblad to Lindblad master equations. Phys. Rev. A 91, 032113 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Dajka, J., Łuczka, J.: Distance growth of quantum states due to initial system-environment correlations. Phys. Rev. A 82, 012341 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Dajka, J., Łuczka, J.: The trace distance and linear entropy of qubit states: the role of initial qubit-environment correlations. Rep. Math. Phys. 70(2), 193–204 (2012)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lindblad, G.: Completely positive maps and entropy inequalities. Commun. Math. Phys. 40, 147–151 (1975)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Uhlmann, A.: Relative entropy and the Wigner–Yanase–Dyson–Lieb concavity in an interpolation theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 54(1), 21–32 (1977)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lieb, E.H., Ruskai, M.B.: Proof of the strong subadditivity of quantum-mechanical entropy. J. Math. Phys. 14(12), 1938–1941 (1973)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.Center for Quantum Information Science & TechnologyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations