Skip to main content
Log in

Common entanglement witnesses and their characteristics

  • Published:
Quantum Information Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate the issue of finding common entanglement witness for certain class of states and extend this study to the case of Schmidt number witnesses. We also introduce the notion of common decomposable and non-decomposable witness operators which is specially useful for constructing a common witness where one of the entangled states is with a positive partial transpose. Our approach is illustrated with the help of suitable examples of qutrit systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bennett C.H., Brassard G., Crepeau C., Jozsa R., Peres A., Wootters W.K.: Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett C.H., Wiesner S.J.: Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein– Podolsky–Rosen states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2881 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G.: Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing. In: Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Comp., Sys., and Sig. Proc., p. 175. Bangalore, India, (1984)

  4. Barenco A., Deutsch D., Ekert A., Jozsa R.: Conditional quantum dynamics and logic gates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4083 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Peres A.: Separability criterion for density matrices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Horodecki M., Horodecki P., Horodecki R.: Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions. Phys. Lett. A 223, 1 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Terhal B.M.: Bell inequalities and the separability criterion. Phys. Lett. A 271, 319 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewenstein M., Krauss B., Cirac J.I., Horodecki P.: Optimization of entanglement witnesses. Phys. Rev. A 62, 052310 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Doherty A.C., Parrilo P.A., Spedalieri F.M.: Complete family of separability criteria. Phys. Rev. A 69, 022308 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sperling J., Vogel W.: Necessary and sufficient conditions for bipartite entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 79, 022318 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sanpera A., Bruβ D., Lewenstein M.: Schmidt-number witnesses and bound entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 63, 050301(R) (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Terhal B.M., Horodecki P.: Schmidt number for density matrices. Phys. Rev. A 61, 040301(R) (2000)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sperling J., Vogel W.: Determination of the Schmidt number. Phys. Rev. A 83, 042315 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu Y.C., Guo G.C.: Determining the existence of the common entanglement witnesses for some entangled states. Phys. Rev. A 75, 052333 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ganguly N., Adhikari S.: Witness for edge states and its characteristics. Phys. Rev. A 80, 032331 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Augusiak R., Grabowski J., Kus M., Lewenstein M.: Searching for extremal PPT entangled states. Opt. Commun. 283, 805 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Acin A., Bruβ D., Lewenstein M., Sanpera A.: Classification of mixed three-qubit states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 040401 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Horodecki P., Horodecki M., Horodecki R.: Bound entanglement can be activated. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1056 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Terhal B.M.: A family of indecomposable positive linear maps based on entangled quantum states. Linear Algebra Its Appl. 323, 61 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Hyllus P., Moura Alves C., Bruβ D., Macchiavello C.: Generation and detection of bound entan-glement. Phys. Rev. A 70, 032316 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Guhne O., Hyllus P., Bruβ D., Ekert A., Lewenstein M., Macchiavello C., Sanpera A.: Experimental detection of entanglement via witness operators and local measurements. J. Mod. Opt. 50, 1079 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nirman Ganguly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ganguly, N., Adhikari, S. & Majumdar, A.S. Common entanglement witnesses and their characteristics. Quantum Inf Process 12, 425–436 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-012-0386-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-012-0386-7

Keywords

Navigation