We analyze quantum two prover one round interactive proof systems, in which noninteracting provers can share unlimited entanglement. The maximum acceptance probability is characterized as a superoperator norm. We get some partial results and in particular we analyze the “rank one” case.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. K Aravind. Arxiv preprint quant-ph/0206070 (2002).
Babai L.,Fortnow L., Lund C. (1991) Comput. Complex. 1:3
Bennett C.H., Bernstein H.J., Popescu S., Schumacher B. (1996) Phys. Rev. A 53(4):2046
Bennett C.H., Brassard G., Crepeau C., Jozsa R., Peres A., Wootters W.K. (1993) Phys. Rev. Lett. 70(13):1895
Bennett C.H., Wiesner S.J. (1992) Phys. Rev. Lett. 69(20):2881
R. Cleve, P. Hoyer, B. Toner, and J. Watrous, Proc. Comput. Complex., pp. 236–249 (2004).
R. Cleve, P. Hoyer, B. Toner, and J. Watrous, Presentation at Computational Complexity (2004).
Communication from the anonymous referee.
R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson, Topics in Matrix Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 1994).
J. Kempe, H. Kobayashi, K. Matsumoto, B. Toner, and T. Vidick, arXiv: 0704.2903 (2007).
A. Kitaev, M. Vyalyi, and A. Shen, Classical and Quantum Computation (American Mathematical Society, 2002).
A. Kitaev and J. Watrous, STOC, pp. 608–617 (2000).
Kobayashi H., Matsumoto K. (2003) J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 66:429
Lund C., Fortnow L., Karloff H., Nisan N. (1992) J. ACM 39(4):859
Shamir A. (1992) J. ACM 39:869
K. G. H. Vollbrecht and R. F. Werner, Arxiv preprint quant-ph/9910064, pp. 6–7 (1999).
J. Watrous, Arxiv preprint quant-ph/0411077 (2005).
S. Wehner, STACS, pp. 162–171 (2006).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rapaport, A., Ta-Shma, A. On the Power of Quantum, One Round, Two Prover Interactive Proof Systems. Quantum Inf Process 6, 445–459 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-007-0068-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-007-0068-z