Tullock and the welfare costs of corruption: there is a “political Coase Theorem”
- 68 Downloads
Gordon Tullock developed an approach to understanding dynamic processes of political change and policy outcomes. The key insight is the notion that political insiders have a comparative advantage—because they face lower transaction costs—in manipulating rules. The result is that political actors can collect revenues from threatening to restrict, or offering to loosen, access to valuable permissions, permits, or services. To the extent that the ability to pay for such favorable treatment is a consequence of private activities that produce greater social value, there is a “political Coase theorem”: corruption makes bad systems more efficient. But the dynamic consequences are extremely negative, because of the inability to institute reforms resulting from application of Tullock’s “transitional gains trap.”
KeywordsHistory of economic thought Rent-seeking Corruption Economic development
Paper prepared for special issue of Public Choice “Commemorating The 50th Anniversary of Gordon Tullock’s ‘The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft.’” Credit for suggestions, but no blame for shortcomings, goes to William Keech, Matthew Mitchell, David Schmidtz and David Skarbek.
- Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1972). The “dead hand” of monopoly. In J. E. Meade (Ed.), Theory of public choice : Political applications of economics (pp. 277–287). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Dwyer, J. (2016). Corruption in New York: A brief history. New York Times. April 19. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/20/nyregion/corruption-in-new-york-a-history.html.
- Easterly, W. (2001). The Elusive quest for growth: Economists’ adventures and misadventures in the tropics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35, 519–530.Google Scholar
- Holcombe, R. (2018). The Coase theorem, applied to arkets and government. The Independent Review, 23(2), 249–266.Google Scholar
- Kirzner, I. M. (1963). Market theory and the price system. Edited and with an Introduction by Peter J. Boettke and Frédéric Sautet (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2011). February 24, 2015.Google Scholar
- Koopman, C., Mitchell, M., & Thierer, A. (2015). The sharing economy and consumer protection regulation, the case for policy change. The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & The Law, 8(2), 529–545.Google Scholar
- Krueger, A. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. American Economic Review, 64(3), 291–303.Google Scholar
- Le, V. H, de Haan, J. & Dietzenbacher, E. (2013). Do higher government wages reduce corruption? Evidence based on a novel dataset. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 4254. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2274648.
- Lessig, L. (2004). Free culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
- McChesney, F. S. (1989). Regulation, taxes, and political extortion. In R. E. Meiners & B. Yandle (Eds.), Regulation and the Reagan era (pp. 223–241). New York: Holmes & Meier.Google Scholar
- Merton, R. K. (1949). Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Mises, L. (1952). Profit and loss. In L. Mises (Ed.), Planning for freedom. South Holland, Ill: Libertarian Press.Google Scholar
- Mises, L. (1998). Human action: A treatise on economics. Auburn, AL: LVM Institute.Google Scholar
- Munger, M. C. On the contingent vice of corruption. Social Philosophy and Policy (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Murphy, K. M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2009). Why is rent-seeking so costly to growth? American Economic Review, 83(2), 409–414.Google Scholar
- Romig, R. (2017). How to steal a river, to feed an enormous building boom, India’s relentless sand miners have devastated the waterways that make life there possible. New York Times, March 1. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/01/magazine/sand-mining-india-how-to-steal-a-river.html.
- Thierer, A. (2016). Permissionless innovation: The continuing case for comprehensive technological freedom. Arlington, VA: Mercatus Center.Google Scholar
- Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft. Western Economic Journal, 5(3), 224–232.Google Scholar
- Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient rent-seeking. In J. Buchanan, R. Tollison, & G. Tullock (Eds.), Towards a theory of the rent-seeking society. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
- Tullock, G. (1987). Rent seeking. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, & P. Newman (Eds.), The new Palgrave: A dictionary of economics (Vol. 4, pp. 147–149). London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar