Public Choice

, Volume 180, Issue 1–2, pp 131–144 | Cite as

Regulation and poverty: an empirical examination of the relationship between the incidence of federal regulation and the occurrence of poverty across the US states

  • Dustin ChambersEmail author
  • Patrick A. McLaughlin
  • Laura Stanley


We estimate the impact of federal regulations on poverty rates in the 50 US states using the recently created Federal Regulation and State Enterprise (FRASE) index, which is an industry-weighted measure of the burden of federal regulations at the state level. Controlling for many other factors known to influence poverty rates, we find a robust, positive and statistically significant relationship between the FRASE index and poverty rates across states. Specifically, we find that a 10% increase in the effective federal regulatory burden on a state is associated with an approximate 2.5% increase in the poverty rate. This paper fills an important gap in both the poverty and the regulation literatures because it is the first one to estimate the relationship between the two variables. Moreover, our results have practical implications for federal policymakers and regulators because the greater poverty that results from additional regulations should be considered when weighing the costs and benefits of additional regulations.


Regulation Poverty States FRASE Regressive effects RegData 

JEL Classification

D31 I32 J38 K20 R10 


  1. Adams, R. H. (2004). Economic growth, inequality and poverty: Estimating the growth elasticity of poverty. World Development, 32(12), 1989–2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Ubaydli, O., & McLaughlin, P. A. (2015). RegData: A numerical database on industry-specific regulations for all United States industries and federal regulations, 1997–2012. Regulation and Governance, 11(1), 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apergis, N., Dincer, O., & Payne, J. E. (2011). On the dynamics of poverty and income inequality in US states. Journal of Economic Studies, 38(2), 132–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey, J. B., Thomas, D. W., & Anderson, J. R. (2018). Regressive effects of regulation on wages. Public Choice. Scholar
  5. Bourguignon, F. (2003). The growth elasticity of poverty reduction: Explaining heterogeneity across countries and time periods. In T. S. Eicher & S. J. Turnovsky (Eds.), Inequality and growth: Theory and policy implications (pp. 3–26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chambers, D., Collins, C. A., & Krause, A. (2017). How do federal regulations affect consumer prices? An analysis of the regressive effects of regulation. Public Choice. Scholar
  7. Chambers, D., & Dhongde, S. (2011). A non-parametric measure of poverty elasticity. Review of Income and Wealth, 57(4), 683–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chambers, D., McLaughlin, P. A., & Stanley, L. (2018). Barriers to prosperity: The harmful impact of entry regulations on income inequality. Public Choice. Scholar
  9. Chambers, D., & Munemo, J. (2017). The impact of regulations and institutional quality on entrepreneurship. Mercatus Working Paper, Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
  10. Chambers, D., Wu, Y., & Yao, H. (2008). The impact of past growth on poverty in Chinese provinces. Journal of Asian Economics, 19(4), 348–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coffey, B., McLaughlin, P. A., & Peretto, P. (2016). The cumulative cost of regulations. Mercatus Working Paper, Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
  12. Crain, N. V., & Crain, W. M. (2010). The impact of regulatory costs on small firms. Washington, DC: Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy.Google Scholar
  13. Crain, W. M., & Crain, N. V. (2014). The cost of federal regulation to the U.S. economy, manufacturing and small business. Washington, DC: National Association of Manufacturers.Google Scholar
  14. Datt, G., & Ravallion, M. (1992). Growth and redistribution components of changes in poverty measures: A decomposition with application to Brazil and India in the 1980s. Journal of Development Economics, 38(2), 275–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dawson, J. W., & Seater, J. J. (2013). Federal regulation and aggregate economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 18(2), 137–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dhongde, S. (2006). Decomposing spatial differences in poverty in India. In R. Kanbur, A. J. Venables, & G. Wan (Eds.), Spatial disparities in human development: Perspectives from Asia (pp. 273–288). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Frank, M. W. (2009). Inequality and growth in the United States: Evidence from a new state-level panel. Economic Inquiry, 47(1), 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Higgs, R. (1987). Crisis and leviathan. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, C., Formby, J. P., & Kim, H. (2011). Economic growth and poverty: A tale of two decades. Applied Economics, 43(28), 4277–4288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kleiner, M. M., & Krueger, A. B. (2013). Analyzing the extent and influence of occupational licensing on the labor market. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(2), 173–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McLaughlin, P. A., Ellig, J., & Shamoun, D. Y. (2014). Regulatory reform in Florida: An opportunity for greater competitiveness and economic efficiency. Florida State University Business Review, 13(1), 96–127.Google Scholar
  23. McLaughlin, P. A., & Sherouse, O. (2016). The impact of federal regulation on the 50 states. Arlington, VA: Mercatus Center at George Mason University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McLaughlin, P. A., & Sherouse, O. (2018). RegData 2.2: A panel dataset on US federal regulations. Public Choice. Scholar
  25. Meng, X., Gregory, R., & Wang, Y. (2005). Poverty, inequality, and growth in urban China, 1986–2000. Journal of Comparative Economics, 33(4), 710–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ram, R. (2007). Roles of income and equality in poverty reduction: Recent cross-country evidence. Journal of International Development, 19(7), 919–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thomas, D. W. (2012). Regressive effects of regulation. Mercatus Working Paper, Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dustin Chambers
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Patrick A. McLaughlin
    • 3
  • Laura Stanley
    • 1
  1. 1.Mercatus Center at George Mason UniversityArlingtonUSA
  2. 2.Salisbury UniversitySalisburyUSA
  3. 3.Mercatus Center at George Mason UniversityArlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations