Advertisement

Public Choice

, Volume 180, Issue 3–4, pp 217–242 | Cite as

An empirical examination of institutions and cross-country incarceration rates

  • Daniel J. D’Amico
  • Claudia R. WilliamsonEmail author
Article

Abstract

Research converges upon institutional explanations for why some countries incarcerate more prisoners than others. The types of institutions that are particularly important are less well understood. This paper investigates empirically the associations between economic, political and legal institutions and incarceration rates in a large cross-section of countries. Using data from 2001 to 2011, we find that countries with smaller prison populations have civil legal origins and fewer years under communism. Our findings also suggest that economic institutions and other economic factors related to economic performance do not correlate with incarceration rates. Collectively, the results indicate that institutions cannot be considered in isolation, but need to be examined simultaneously, with a focus on historical, political and legal factors.

Keywords

Prisons Incarceration Institutions Legal origins Communism 

JEL codes

K14 K33 P5 F55 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the editor and an anonymous referee for helpful comments and suggestions. There is no funding to report.

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
  2. Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 155–194.Google Scholar
  3. Avio, K. (2003). The economics of prisons. In A. Tabarrok (Ed.), Changing of the guard: Private prisons and the control of crime (pp. 9–56). Oakland, CA: Independent Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Bandyopadhyay, S., & McCannon, B. (2014). The effect of the election of prosecutors on criminal trials. Public Choice, 161(1–2), 141–156.Google Scholar
  5. Barclay, G., Tavares, C., & Siddique, A. (2001a). International comparisons of criminal justice statistics, 1999. London: Great Britain Home Office Research and Statistics Directorate.Google Scholar
  6. Barclay, G., Tavares, C., & Siddique, A. (2001). International comparisons of criminal justice statistics, 1999. London: Great Britain Home Office Research and Statistics Directorate.Google Scholar
  7. Barro, R., & McCleary, R. (2003). Religion and economic growth. American Sociological Review, 68, 760–781.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. In N. G. Fielding, A. Clarke, & R. Witt (Eds.), The economic dimensions of crime (pp. 13–68). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Beckett, K., & Godoy, A. (2008). Power, politics, and penalty: Punitiveness as backlash in American democracies. Studies in Law, Politics and Society, 45, 139–174.Google Scholar
  10. Beckett, K., & Sasson, T. (2004). The politics of injustice: Crime and punishment in America (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Beckett, K., & Western, B. (2001). Governing social marginality: Welfare, incarceration, and the transformation of state policy. Punishment and Society, 3(1), 43–59.Google Scholar
  12. Belova, E., & Gregory, P. (2009). Political economy of crime and punishment under Stalin. Public Choice, 140(3–4), 463–478.Google Scholar
  13. Benson, B. (1990). The enterprise of law: Justice without the state. San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy.Google Scholar
  14. Benson, B. (1994). Third thoughts on contracting out. Journal of Libertarian Studies, 11(1), 44–78.Google Scholar
  15. Benson, B., & Wollan, L. (1989). Prison overcrowding and judicial incentives. Madison Paper Series, 3, 1–22.Google Scholar
  16. Berdejo, C., & Yuchtman, N. (2013). Crime, punishment, and politics: an analysis of political cycles in criminal sentencing. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3), 741–756.Google Scholar
  17. Boettke, P. J., Coyne, C. J., & Leeson, P. T. (2008). Institutional stickiness and the new development economics. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 67(2), 331–358.Google Scholar
  18. Boettke, P. J., Coyne, C. J., & Leeson, P. T. (2013). Comparative historical political economy. Journal of Institutional Economics, 9(3), 285–301.Google Scholar
  19. Bottoms, A. (1995). The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing. In C. Clarkson & R. Morgan (Eds.), The politics of sentencing reform (pp. 17–50). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  20. Brodeur, J. (2007). Comparative penology in perspective. Crime and Justice, 36, 49–91.Google Scholar
  21. Brown, M. (2009). The culture of punishment: Prison, society, and spectacle. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Butler, J., Conzo, P., & Leroch, M. (2013). Social identity and punishment, EIEF Working Paper 16/13.Google Scholar
  23. Caplan, B. (2001). Rational irrationality and the microfoundations of political failure. Public Choice, 107(3/4), 311–331.Google Scholar
  24. Caplan, B. (2007). The myth of the rational voter: Why democracies choose bad policies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Cappell, C., & Sykes, G. (1991). Prison commitment, crime and unemployment: A theoretical and empirical specification for the United States, 1933–1985. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 7, 155–199.Google Scholar
  26. Cavadino, M., & Dignan, J. (2006a). Penal systems: A comparative approach. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Cavadino, M., & Dignan, J. (2006b). Penal policy and political economy. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 6, 435–456.Google Scholar
  28. Cheung, S. N. (1972). The enforcement of property rights in children, and the marriage contract. The Economic Journal, 82, 641–657.Google Scholar
  29. Chiricos, T., & Delone, M. (1992). Labor surplus and punishment: a review and assessment of theory and evidence. Social Problems, 39, 421–446.Google Scholar
  30. Clarkson, C., & Morgan, R. (Eds.). (1995). The politics of sentencing reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Cullen, F., Clark, G., & Wozniak, J. (1985). Explaining the get-tough movement: can the public be blamed? Federal Probation, 45(2), 16–24.Google Scholar
  32. Cullen, F., Fisher, B., & Applegate, B. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of the research (Vol. 27). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. D’Amico, D., & Williamson, C. (2015). Do legal origins affect cross-country incarceration rates? Journal of Comparative Economics, 43(3), 595–612.Google Scholar
  34. D’Amico, D., & Williamson, C. (2018). The punitive consequences of organizational structures in England, France and the United States. Journal of Institutional Economics.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137418000127.Google Scholar
  35. De Giorgi, A. (2006). Rethinking the political economy of punishment: Perspectives on post-Fordism and penal politics. Farnham: Aldershot.Google Scholar
  36. De Mesquita, B. B., Cherif, F. M., Downs, G. W., & Smith, A. (2005). Thinking inside the box: A closer look at democracy and human rights. International Studies Quarterly, 49, 439–458.Google Scholar
  37. DeMichele, M. (2013). Using Weber’s rechtssoziologie to explain western punishment: A typological framework. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 21, 85–109.Google Scholar
  38. DeMichele, M. (2014). A panel analysis of legal culture, political economics, and punishment among 15 Western countries, 1960–2010. International Criminal Justice Review, 24, 1–17.Google Scholar
  39. Di Tella, R. D., & Dubra, J. (2011). Free to punish? The American dream and the harsh treatment of criminals. NBER Working Papers, 17309.Google Scholar
  40. Djankov, S. (2009). The regulation of entry: A survey. The World Bank Research Observer, 24, 183–203.Google Scholar
  41. Djankov, S., McLiesh, C., & Ramalho, R. (2006). Regulation and growth. Economic Letters, 92, 395–401.Google Scholar
  42. Downes, D., & Hansen, K. (2006). Welfare and punishment in comparative perspective. In S. Armstrong & L. McAra (Eds.), Perspectives on punishment: The contours of control (pp. 133–154). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Durkheim, E. (1895). The rules of sociological method. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  44. Enns, P. K. (2014). The public’s increasing punitiveness and its influence on mass incarceration in the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 857–872.Google Scholar
  45. Flanagan, T., & Longmire, D. (Eds.). (1996). Americans view crime and justice. Sage Publishers: A National Public Opinion Survey.Google Scholar
  46. Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  47. Garland, D. (Ed.). (2001). Mass imprisonment: Social causes and consequences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Giertz, J., & Nardulli, P. (1985). Prison overcrowding. Public Choice, 46, 71–78.Google Scholar
  49. Greenberg, D., & West, V. (2008). Siting the death penalty internationally. Law & Social Inquiry, 33(2), 295–343.Google Scholar
  50. Greene, J. (2007). The secret joke of Kant’s soul. In N. A. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral Psychology, Vol. 3: The neuroscience of morality: emotion, disease, and development. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  51. Guala, F. (2012). Reciprocity: Weak or strong? What punishment experiments do and do not demonstrate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  52. Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., & Hall, J. (2013). The economic freedom of the world: Annual report. Vancouver: Fraser Institute.Google Scholar
  53. Hall, J., & Lawson, R. (2014). Economic freedom of the world: An accounting of the literature. Contemporary Economic Policy, 32(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  54. Harcourt, B. (2012). The illusion of free markets: Punishment and the myth of natural order. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Heiland, H., & Shelley, L. (1992). Civilization, modernization and the development of crime and control’. In H. Heiland, L. Shelley, & H. Katoh (Eds.), Crime and control in comparative perspectives (pp. 1–19). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  56. Houser, D., Xiao, E., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. (2008). When punishment fails: research on sanctions, intentions and non-cooperation. Games and Economic Behavior, 62(2), 509–532.Google Scholar
  57. Huber, G., & Gordon, S. (2004). Accountability and Coercion: is justice blind when it runs for office? American Journal of Political Science, 48, 247–263.Google Scholar
  58. Jacobs, D., & Kleban, R. (2003). Political institutions, minorities, and punishment: A pooled cross-national analysis of imprisonment rates. Social Forces, 82, 725–755.Google Scholar
  59. Kangaspunta, K., Joutsen, M., & Ollus, N. (1998). Crime and criminal justice in Europe and North America 1990–1994. Helsinki: HEUNI.Google Scholar
  60. Karstedt, S. (2006). Democracy, values, and violence: Paradoxes, tensions, and comparative advantages of liberal inclusion. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 605(1), 50–81.Google Scholar
  61. Karstedt, S. (2011). Our sense of justice: Values, justice and punishment. In S. Parmentier, L. Walgrave, I. Aertsen, J. Maesschalck, & L. Paoli (Eds.), The sparking discipline of criminology: John Braithwaite and the construction of critical social science and social justice (pp. 33–58). Belgium: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Klein, S. (2005). The return of federal judicial discretion in criminal sentencing. Valparaiso University Law Review, 39, 693–741.Google Scholar
  63. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The economic consequences of legal origins. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(2), 285–332.Google Scholar
  64. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 15, 222–279.Google Scholar
  65. Lacey, N. (2008). The Prisoners’ dilemma: Political economy and punishment in contemporary democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Lacey, N. (2012). Political systems and criminal justice: the prisoners’ dilemma after the coalition. Current Legal Problems, 65(1), 203–239.Google Scholar
  67. Lappi-Seppälä, T. (2008). Trust, welfare, and political culture: Explaining differences in national penal policies. Crime and Justice, 37(1), 313–387.Google Scholar
  68. Leeson, P. T. (2013). Gypsy law. Public Choice, 155(3–4), 273–292.Google Scholar
  69. Leeson, P. T., Boettke, P. J., & Lemke, J. S. (2014). Wife sales. Review of behavioral. Economics, 1(4), 349–379.Google Scholar
  70. Leeson, P. T., & Pierson, J. (2016). Prenups. The Journal of Legal Studies, 45(2), 367–400.Google Scholar
  71. Levitt, S., & Miles, T. (2006). Economic contributions to the understanding of crime. American Review of Social Science, 2, 147–164.Google Scholar
  72. Marshall, M., & Jaggers, K. (2000). Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 18001999. Unpublished manuscript, University of Maryland, Center for International Development and Conflict Management.Google Scholar
  73. Mauer, M. (1995). Americans behind bars: The international use of incarceration. The Prison Journal, 75, 113–123.Google Scholar
  74. Mayhew, P., & White, P. (1997). The 1996 international crime victimisation survey. London: Great Britain Home Office Research and Statistics Directorate.Google Scholar
  75. McBride, K. (2007). Punishment and political order. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  76. Mocan, N. (2008). Vengeance. NBER Working Paper No 14131.Google Scholar
  77. Mocan, N. (2013). Vengeance. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3), 969–982.Google Scholar
  78. Mungan, M. (2017). Over-incarceration and disenfranchisement. Public Choice, 172(3–4), 377–395.Google Scholar
  79. Nardulli, P. (1984). The misalignment of penal responsibilities and state prison crises: Costs, consequences, and corrective Actions. University of Illinois Law Review, 1984, 365–387.Google Scholar
  80. Neapolitan, J. (2001). Examination of cross-national variation in punitiveness. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45(6), 691–710.Google Scholar
  81. Neuman, W., & Berger, R. (1988). Competing perspectives on cross-national crime: An evaluation of theory and evidence. Sociological Quarterly, 29(2), 281–313.Google Scholar
  82. Newman, G. (Ed.). (1999). Global report on crime and justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  83. North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  84. North, D., Wallis, J., & Weingast, B. (2009). Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Nunn, N. (2009). The importance of history for economic development. Annual Review of Economics, 1(1), 65–92.Google Scholar
  86. Posner, R. A. (2014). Economic analysis of law (9th ed.). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  87. Pratt, J. (2007). Penal populism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  88. Ruddell, R. (2005). Social disruption, state priorities, and minority threat: A cross-national study of imprisonment. Punishment & Society, 7(1), 7–28.Google Scholar
  89. Rusche, G., & Kirschheimer, O. (1939). Punishment and social structure. New York: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  90. Saha, S., Gounder, R., & Su, J. J. (2009). The interaction effect of economic freedom and democracy on corruption: A panel cross-country analysis. Economics Letters, 105(2), 173–176.Google Scholar
  91. Savelsberg, J. J. (1994). Knowledge, domination, and criminal punishment. American Journal of Sociology, 99(4), 911–943.Google Scholar
  92. Scheingold, S. (1984). The politics of law and order: Street crime and public policy. New Orleans: Quid Pro.Google Scholar
  93. Shelley, L. (1981). Crime and modernization: The impact of industrialization and urbanization on crime. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
  94. Shughart, W. (2018). Gordon Tullock’s critique of the common law. The Independent Review, 23(2), 209–226.Google Scholar
  95. Skarbek, D. (2011). Governance and prison gangs. American Political Science Review, 105(4), 702–716.Google Scholar
  96. Skarbek, D. (2014). The social order of the underworld: How prison gangs govern the American penal system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Smith, P. (2008). Punishment and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  98. Soares, R. R. (2004a). Crime reporting as a measure of institutional development. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52(4), 851–871.Google Scholar
  99. Soares, R. R. (2004b). Development, crime and punishment: Accounting for the international differences in crime rates. Journal of Development Economics, 73(1), 155–184.Google Scholar
  100. Sobel, R., Hall, J., & Ryan, M. (2010). Electoral pressures and the legal system: Friends or foes? In E. Lopez (Ed.), Law without romance: Public choice and the U.S. Legal system. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  101. Spamann, H. (2015). The US crime puzzle: A comparative perspective on US crime and punishment. American Law and Economics Review, 18(1), 33–87.Google Scholar
  102. Stringham, E., & Levendis, J. (2010). Chapter 6: The relationship between economic freedom and homicide. In J. Gwartney, J. Hall, & R. Lawson (Eds.) Economic Freedom of the World: Annual Report. Fraser Institute: 203–218.Google Scholar
  103. Stucky, T. D., Heimer, K., & Lang, J. B. (2005). Partisan politics, electoral competition and imprisonment: An analysis of states over time. Criminology, 43(1), 211–248.Google Scholar
  104. Stuntz, W. (2011). The collapse of American criminal justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  105. Sutton, J. R. (2000). Imprisonment and social classification in five common-law democracies, 1955–1985. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 350–386.Google Scholar
  106. Sutton, J. R. (2004). The political economy of imprisonment in affluent western democracies, 1960–1990. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 170–189.Google Scholar
  107. Taggart, W., & Winn, R. (1994). Imprisonment in the American states. Social Science Quarterly, 74(4), 736–749.Google Scholar
  108. Tonry, M. (2004). Thinking about crime: Sense and sensibility in American penal culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Tullock, G. (1997). The case against the common law. The Blackstone Commentaries, No. 1, ed. by Amanda J. Owens. Fairfax, VA: Locke Institute.Google Scholar
  110. United Nations Office on Drug and Crime (UNODC), Data as of 5/15/2014. http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/statistics/crime.html.
  111. Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  112. Walker, N., & Hough, M. (1988). Public attitudes to sentencing: surveys from five countries. Farnham: Gower.Google Scholar
  113. Walmsley, R. (2003). Global incarceration and prison trends. Forum on Crime and Society, 3, 65–78.Google Scholar
  114. Walmsley, R. (2011). World Prison Population List (1st–9th Edition). London: International Centre for Prison Studies.Google Scholar
  115. Weber, M. (1922). Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  116. World Bank. (2013). Worldwide governance indicators. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
  117. World Bank. (2014). World development indicators. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
  118. World Bank. (2017). Doing business. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
  119. Zimring, F., Hawkins, G., & Kamin, S. (2001). Punishment and democracy: Three strikes and you’re out in California. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Political Theory ProjectBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  2. 2.Mississippi State UniversityMississippi StateUSA

Personalised recommendations