Skip to main content

The political economy of churches in Denmark, 1300–2015

Abstract

This paper reports new time-series for the numbers and sizes of churches in Denmark over a 715-year period. Per capita, the new series are termed church densities. A pattern emerges in the series that corresponds to the main development in the economy: until 1750, the economy was in the traditional steady state, where church densities were high and did not decline substantially. Modern development set in after 1750. Since then, church densities have declined more than five times. Moreover, capacity utilization of church rooms has declined, which means that the reduction in the demand for churches must have been even larger. We argue that this large decline is caused by a fall in religiosity that is caused by economic development as measured by the rise in incomes. In parallel with similar transitions in other sectors, e.g., the Agricultural Transition, it is termed the Religious Transition.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. 1.

    Danish words are given in [ ] after the English translation when necessary. For institutions, we try to use the English translation of the institution itself. Most Danish sources cited are in Danish, but English translations are given in { } in the reference list.

  2. 2.

    Two thousand churches were built between 1050 and 1250. It is often seen as a large effort, but it works out to only 10 churches per year, which is a moderate effort for a population of 500,000. During the next 715 years, only 924 churches were built.

  3. 3.

    The project is expected to run for another 30–40 years.

  4. 4.

    The largest Danish church, Grundtvigskirken, was built 1921–1940 in a (then) new suburb of Copenhagen to look like a giant village church. The fall in churchgoing has led to a rearrangement of the chairs in the church. The original number of chairs was 1863, which has been reduced to 750 today (Grundtvigskirken 2015). This points to the falling effectiveness of churches discussed in Sect. 2.4.

  5. 5.

    A large amount of literature deals with the effects of ownership. The classic papers on property rights are republished in Pejovich (1997), while the World Bank (1995) compares private and public ownership.

  6. 6.

    A detailed historical narrative of the period is found in Scocozza (1990).

  7. 7.

    See Ministry for Culture (2013), Ministry for the Church (2013), Christian Daily (2016).

  8. 8.

    It would be easy to count churchgoers, but it is rarely done. Niskanen’s (1994) theory of the bureaucracy predicts that a bureau such as the Church wants to protect its budgets against threats. A key device in this endeavor is to refrain from collecting threatening information such as church attendance.

  9. 9.

    During this period, a strongly religious royal court tried to make people more religious.

  10. 10.

    Sections 3.1 and 3.2 refer to large literatures that do not overlap even though their subject does. While little is agreed upon in the secularization literature (Bruce 1992), the literature on growth is more united (Jones and Vollrath 2013).

  11. 11.

    Before 1849, other religions were not permitted, with a few exceptions. In 1674, religious freedom was granted to Fredericia, which was a walled garrison town. In 1682, the Catholic Church and three reformed denominations were permitted to hold services for foreigners, notably diplomats.

  12. 12.

    Some proponents of secularization are Wilson (1966), Berger (1967), Norris and Inglehart (2011), Ahlin (2015), while some opponents are Stark and Iannaccone (1984), Berger (1996), Stark (1999).

  13. 13.

    The equivalence hypothesis claims that the cross-country and the time-series pattern are almost the same. The most well-known transitions are the Demographic (Lee 2003) and the Agricultural ones (Timmer 1988). Transitions also occur in variables that are not purely “economic” such as in Democracy (Paldam and Gundlach 2017) and Corruption (Gundlach and Paldam 2009). In the first three cases, equivalence holds. It seems to hold for corruption too, but historical data on corruption are anecdotal only. The present paper covers the time series dimension abundantly, but only for one crude proxy and one country.

  14. 14.

    The composite trend β t has three parts: (i) The church package may shift slowly over the centuries. (ii) When transport becomes cheaper, the church stock can be more effectively used. This is a negative trend, so that r decreases a little less than s. (iii) The increasing urbanization and other movements of the population make the church distribution less efficient. We assess that (ii) is larger than (iii), while the sign on (i) is uncertain.

  15. 15.

    The approximation is quite good if β is close to zero. If (10) and (11) could be estimated, it is possible that (11) has the better fit, and that, consequently, (12) is the approximation.

  16. 16.

    Maddison’s gdp data are in 1990 International Geary–Khamis dollars.

  17. 17.

    The increase in population between 1700 and 1800 may have played a causal role in starting the Grand Transition. The same pattern is found in the United Kingdom (Clark 2007).

  18. 18.

    Table 5 shows a high confluence between variables which makes it difficult to detect causality. Even though 15 observations are rather few, the tests nevertheless seem to work.

  19. 19.

    This estimate is based on the number of seats reported by Kirsten Jensen (source 4).

  20. 20.

    Paldam (2017) supplements the production estimates of Eq. (6) with assessments of the church’s incomes that tally reasonably well.

References

  1. Ahlin, L. (2015). Growth in alternative therapy: A valid argument against the secularization thesis? Contemporary Religion, 30, 399–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Becker, S. O., Nagler, M., & Woessmann, L. (2014). Education promoted secularization. CEPR discussion paper 9884.

  3. Berger, P. L. (1967). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berger, P. L. (1996/1997). Secularism in retreat. The National Interest, 46, 3–12.

  5. Bøgh, A. (2015). Højmiddelalderen, ca . 10501340: Kirke og gejstlighed {The middle ages, ap. 10501340: Church and clergy}. http://danmarkshistorien.dk/historiske-perioder/hoejmiddelalderen-ca-1050-1340/kirke-og-gejstlighed/.

  6. Bruce, S. (Ed.). (1992). Religion and modernization: Sociologists and historians debate the secularization thesis. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Casanova, J. (2006). Rethinking secularization: A global comparative perspective. The Hedgehog Review, 8, 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Christensen, N. (2008). Menighedsrådenes historie {The history of Danish parish councils}. http://kristendom.dk/guide-til-folkekirken/menighedsrådenes-historie.

  9. Christian Daily [Kristeligt Dagblad]. (2016). Kirkelukninger {Church closings}. Online collection of articles about church closing from 2013 onwards. http://kristeligt-dagblad.dk/kirkelukninger.

  10. Clark, G. (2007). A farewell to alms. A brief economic history of the world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dobbelaere, K. (2002). Secularization: An analysis at three levels. Bruxelles: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Durkheim, E. (1893) [1984]. The division of labour in Society. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

  13. ESS, European Social Surveys. http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/. Download March, 2017.

  14. Fenger, O. (1988). Kirker rejses alle vegne. 1050–1250 {Churches are being raised everywhere}. In O. Olsen (Ed.), Danmarkshistorien {The history of Denmark} (Vol. 4). Copenhagen: Gyldendal og Politiken.

  15. Franck, R., & Iannaccone, L. R. (2014). Religious decline in the 20th century west: Testing alternative explanations. Public Choice, 159, 385–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grundtvigskirken (2015). Grundtvig og kirken {Grundtvig and the church}. http://grundtvigskirke.dk/page/403/kirken-og-grundtvig.

  17. Gundlach, E., & Paldam, M. (2009). The transition of corruption: From poverty to honesty. Economic Letters, 103, 146–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gundlach, E., & Paldam, M. (2012). A model of the religious transition. Theoretical Econ. Letters, 2012, 419–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Heelas, P., & Woodhead, L. (2005). The spiritual revolution: Why religion is giving way to spirituality. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ingesman, P. (2013). Den danske kirke i middelalderen {The Church of Denmark in medieval times}. In P. Ingesman & N. A. Pedersen (Eds.), Kirkens historie {History of the church} (Vol. 1, pp. 687–715). Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Iversen, H. R. (2013). Hvorfor forstår vi kirkestatistik, som vi gør? {Why do we understand church statistics as we do?} In M. V. Nielsen & H. R. Iversen (Eds.), Tal om Kirken. Undersøgelser af Folkekirkens aktivitets- og deltagerstatistik {Church data: Studies of activity and members participation} (pp. 115–128). http://teol.ku.dk/cfk/dokumenter/Tal_om_kirken_NY_med_tabellerrev_12.02.pdf.

  22. Jones, C. I., & Vollrath, D. (2013). Introduction to economic growth (3rd ed.). New York: WW Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kristensen, H. K. (2013). Klostre i det middelalderlige Danmark {Monasteries in medieval Denmark}. Højbjerg: Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Larsen, K. E. (1996). Indre Mission i nyere tid {Home mission today}. Fredericia: Lohse.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lee, R. (2003). The demographic transition: Three centuries of fundamental change. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1, 167–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Maddison, A. (2001). The world economy: A millennial perspective. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Maddison, A. (2003). The world economy: Historical statistics. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Maddison Project. (2013). http://ggdc.net/maddison/maddison-project/home.htm (Maddison (1926–2010) updated his data till 2010 one month before he passed away. His project was continued after 2012 by a group of economic historians).

  29. Malinowski, B. K. (1948). Magic, science and religion and other essays. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Marx, K. (1843) [1970]. Critique of Hegel’s ‘philosophy of right’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  31. Ministry for Culture [Kulturministeriet]. (2013). Afgørelse i 14 kirkelukningssager i Københavns Stift {A decision on the closing of 14 churches in the Diocese of Copenhagen}. http://kum.dk/nyheder-og-presse/pressemeddelelser/nyheder/afgoerelse-i-14-kirkelukningssager-i-koebenhavns-stift/1/1/.

  32. Ministry for the Church [Kirkeministeriet]. (2013). Sareen vil have retningslinjer for kirkelukninger {Sareen calls for church closing guidelines}. http://km.dk/folkekirken/nyhedsarkiv-kirke/nyhed-om-kirke/news/sareen-vil-have-retningslinjer-for-kirkelukninger/.

  33. Niskanen, W. A. (1994). Bureaucracy and public economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2011). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Paldam, M. (2017). An economic perspective on the reformation and the downscaling of the church in Denmark, 1450–1650. Working paper available from http://martin.paldam.dk/GT-Religion.php.

  36. Paldam, M., & Gundlach, E. (2013). The religious transition. A long-run perspective. Public Choice, 156, 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Paldam, M., & Gundlach, E. (2017). Jumps into democracy: The transition in the Polity Index. Conference paper.

  38. Pejovich, S. (Ed.). (1997). The economic foundations of property rights. Selected readings. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  39. PEW Research Center. (2015). America’s changing religious landscape. May 12. http://pewforum.org/files/2015/05/RLS-08-26-full-report.pdf.

  40. Putnam, R. D., & Campbell, D. E. (2010). American grace: How religion divides and unites us. New York, NY: Simon & Shuster.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Scheve, K., & Stasavage, D. (2006). Religion and preferences for social insurance. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1, 255–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Scocozza, B. (1990). Ved afgrundens rand (1600-1700) {At the edge of the abyss}. In O. Olsen (Ed.), Danmarkshistorien {The history of Denmark} (Vol. 8). Copenhagen: Gyldendal og Politiken.

  43. Shiner, L. (1967). The concept of secularization in empirical research. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 6, 207–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Stark, R. (1999). Secularization, R.I.P. Sociology of Religion, 60, 249–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Stark, R., & Iannaccone, L. (1984). A supply-side reinterpretation of the ‘secularization’ of Europe. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 33, 230–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Statistics Denmark. (1979). Dansk kultur-statistik 19601977 {Danish cultural statistics 19691977}. http://dst.dk/Site/Dst/Udgivelser/GetPubFile.aspx?id=4808&sid=kult1960-1977.

  47. Statstics Denmark. (2017). Folkekirkens medlemstal {Church membership}. http://km.dk/folkekirken/kirke-statistik/folkekirkens-medlemstal/.

  48. Timmer, C. P. (1988). The agricultural transformation. In H. Chenery & T. N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Handbook of development economics (Vol. 1, pp. 275–331). Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ulsig, E. (1991). Pest og befolkningsnedgang i Danmark i det 14. århundrede {Plague and population decline in Denmark in the 14th century}. Historisk Tidsskrift, 15, 21–43.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Weber, M. (1903/1904) [2002]. The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London: Penguin.

  51. Wilson, B. (1966). Religion in secular society: A sociological comment. London: C.A. Watts.

    Google Scholar 

  52. World Bank. (1995). Bureaucrats in business: The economics and politics of government ownership. Washington, DC: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zuckerman, P. (2008). Society without God: What the least religious nations can tell us about contentment. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Thomas Clausen and especially Sophie Bønding for research assistance and to our two departments for financing that assistance, as well as Erich Gundlach for many discussions, and the referees and editor for unusually constructive comments. We also want to thank Casper Worm Hansen, who contributed to the design and early stages of the project; Michael Andersen and his staff at the DNM project for a fruitful meeting; the Center for Contemporary Religions at Aarhus University for consultations; Leif Danziger, Niels Haldrup, Karsten Merrald Sørensen, and Ron Wintrobe have given useful comments. The paper has been presented at the Department of the Study of Religion, Aarhus University; The Danish Public Choice 2015 Workshop, Aarhus; The European Public Choice 2015 Meeting, Groningen; the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion’s 2015 Meeting, Los Angeles; The Department of Economics, Deakin University 2016, Melbourne.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Paldam.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 12 kb)

Appendix: Sources for church data (all URLs accessed in late spring 2016)

Appendix: Sources for church data (all URLs accessed in late spring 2016)

1 Parish Portal (Sogneportalen)
http://sogn.dk/index.html
Official list from the Ministry for the Church. Covers all present churches, including the URLs of the church
2 DNM-Project (at the Danish National Museum)
http://danmarkskirker.natmus.dk
Detailed ongoing registration. Only systematic source on closed churches. Started 1927—app 36% missinga
3 Wiki-Danmark
https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Ongoing data collection project, p.t., currently covering about 70% of the churches. Fine and concise reporting
4 Kirsten M. Jensen’s project
http://www.kirkehistorie.dk
Ongoing data collection project. Covers age and seats in app 60% of the churches
5 Poul Reitoft’s project
http://www.reitoft.dk/kirker.html
Only names of churches and year of construction, and regional classification based on the church classification
6 Church Project home page
http://www.martin.paldam.dk/GT-Religious.php
It refers to the homepage of our coded data
7 Church statistics (Kirkestatistik)
http://www.km.dk/folkekirken/kirkestatistik/
Church statistics, covers membership data, baptisms, etc
8 Krak, addresses and maps
http://www.krak.dk
Addresses and maps of all existing churches
9 Catholic Church in Denmark
https://www.katolsk.dk
Source for present monasteries
  1. Sources 3–5 are typical hobby-projects, done with great care and a strong interest in the subject. They appear to use the DNM data as a source. They have been used to control the data reported in Table 1
  2. aThe DNM-project does not have a fixed format in the reports, and most researchers of the project are from a qualitative tradition. Each church has an article that describes the historical development of the building, including its inventory and its location as well as relevant folk legends and historical circumstances

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paldam, E., Paldam, M. The political economy of churches in Denmark, 1300–2015. Public Choice 172, 443–463 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-017-0455-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Church stock
  • Religious Transition
  • Historical time series

JEL Classification

  • N13
  • N14
  • Z12