Public Choice

, Volume 171, Issue 3–4, pp 409–427 | Cite as

Strategic gerontocracy: why nondemocratic systems produce older leaders

Article

Abstract

One characteristic of nondemocratic regimes is that leaders cannot be removed from office by legal means: in most authoritarian regimes, no institutional way of dismissing incompetent rulers is available, and overthrowing them is costly. Anticipating this, people who have a say in the selection of the leader are likely to resort to alternative strategies to limit his tenure. In this paper, we examine empirically the “strategic gerontocracy” hypothesis: Because selecting aging leaders is a convenient way of reducing their expected time in office, gerontocracy will become a likely outcome whenever leaders are expected to rule for life. We test this hypothesis using data on political leaders for the period from 1960 to 2008, and find that dictators have shorter life expectancies than democrats at the time they take office. We also observe variations in the life expectancies of dictators: those who are selected by consent are on average closer to death than those who seize power in an irregular manner. This finding suggests that gerontocracy is a consequence of the choice process, since it disappears when dictators self-select into leadership positions.

Keywords

Gerontocracy Democracy Dictatorship Leadership selection 

Supplementary material

11127_2017_449_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 17 kb)

References

  1. Albert, S. M., & Duffy, J. (2012). Differences in risk aversion between young and older adults. Neuroscience and Neuroeconomics, 1, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anzia, S. F., & Berry, C. R. (2011). The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson effect: Why do congresswomen outperform congressmen? American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 478–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bak, D., & Palmer, G. (2010). Testing the Biden hypotheses: Leader tenure, age, and international conflict. Foreign Policy Analysis, 6(3), 257–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baltrunaite, A., Bello, P., Casarico, A., & Profeta, P. (2014). Gender quotas and the quality of politicians. Journal of Public Economics, 118(October), 62–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baturo, A. (2016). Cursus honorum: Personal background, careers and experience of political leaders in democracy and dictatorship—New data and analyses. Politics and Governance, 4(2), 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beath, A., Fotini, C., Egorov, G., & Enikolopov, R. (2016). Electoral rules and political selection: Theory and evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan. The Review of Economic Studies, 83(3), 932–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Besley, T., Montalvo, J. G., & Reynal-Querol, M. (2011). Do educated leaders matter? The Economic Journal, 121(554), 205–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Besley, T., & Reynal-Querol, M. (2011). Do democracies select more educated leaders? American Political Science Review, 105(03), 552–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bialer, S. (1982). Stalin’s successors: Leadership, stability and change in the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brollo, F., & Troiano, U. (2016). What happens when a woman wins an election? Evidence from close races in Brazil. Journal of Development Economics, 122(September), 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. M., & Morrow, J. D. (2003). The logic of political survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Calin, C., & Prins, B. (2015). The sources of presidential foreign policy decision making: Executive experience and militarized interstate conflicts. International Journal of Peace Studies, 20(1), 17–34.Google Scholar
  13. Carnes, N., & Lupu, N. (2016). What good is a college degree? Education and leader quality reconsidered. The Journal of Politics, 78(1), 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheibub, J. A., Gandhi, J., & Vreeland, J. R. (2010). Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, 143(1–2), 67–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colgan, J. D. (2013). Domestic revolutionary leaders and international conflict. World Politics, 65(4), 656–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Deakin, J., Aitken, M., Robbins, T., & Sahakian, B. J. (2004). Risk taking during decision-making in normal volunteers changes with age. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10(4), 590–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dreher, A., Lamla, M. J., Lein, S. M., & Somogyi, F. (2009). The impact of political leaders’ profession and education on reforms. Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(1), 169–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eisner, M. (2011). Killing kings: Patterns of regicide in Europe, AD 600–1800. British Journal of Criminology, 51(3), 556–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flanagan, J. G. (1989). Hierarchy in simple “egalitarian” societies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 18, 245–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fortes, M., & Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (2015). African political systems. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Gallagher, M. E., & Allen, S. H. (2014). Presidential personality: Not just a nuisance. Foreign Policy Analysis, 10(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geddes, B. (1999). What do we know about democratization after twenty years? Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 115–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gelpi, C., & Feaver, P. D. (2004). Choosing your battles American civil-military relations and the use of force. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gleditsch, N. P., Wallensteen, P., Eriksson, M., Sollenberg, M., & Strand, H. (2002). Armed conflict 1946–2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 39(5), 615–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goemans, H. E., Gleditsch, K. S., & Chiozza, G. (2009). Introducing Archigos: A dataset of political leaders. Journal of Peace Research, 46(2), 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hayo, B., & Neumeier, F. (2014). Political leaders’ socioeconomic background and fiscal performance in Germany. European Journal of Political Economy, 34(June), 184–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hayo, B., & Neumeier, F. (2016). Political leaders’ socioeconomic background and public budget deficits: Evidence from OECD countries. Economics and Politics, 28(1), 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Horowitz, M. C., McDermott, R., & Stam, A. C. (2005). Leader age, regime type and violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(5), 661–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Horowitz, M. C., & Stam, A. C. (2014). How prior military experience influences the future militarized behavior of leaders. International Organization, 68(03), 527–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jayasuriya, D. S., & Burke, P. J. (2013). Female parliamentarians and economic growth: Evidence from a large panel. Applied Economics Letters, 20(3), 304–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Joachimsen, B., & Thomasius, S. (2014). The perfect finance minister: Whom to appoint as finance minister to balance the budget. European Journal of Political Economy, 34(June), 390–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jong-A-Pin, R., & Mierau, J. O. (2011). No country for old men: Aging dictators and economic growth. KOF Working papers 11-289, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.Google Scholar
  34. Kendall-Taylor, A., & Frantz, E. (2016). When dictators die. Journal of Democracy, 27(4), 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kim, N. K. (2017). Revolutionary leaders and mass killing. Journal of Conflict Resolution, (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  36. Koellner, P. (2013). Informal institutions in autocracies: Analytical perspectives and the case of the Chinese Communist Party. In A. Croissant, S. Kailitz, P. Koellner, & S. Wurster (Eds.), Comparing autocracies in the early twenty-first century (pp. 84–110). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Kokkonen, A., & Sundell, A. (2014). Delivering stability: Primogeniture and autocratic survival in European monarchies 1000–1800. American Political Science Review, 108(02), 438–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kurrild-Klitgaard, P. (2000). The constitutional economics of autocratic succession. Public Choice, 103(1), 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Manin, B. (1996). The principles of representative government. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent “Yes”. The Journal of Politics, 61(3), 628–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Melander, E., Pettersson, T., & Themnér, L. (2016). Organized violence, 1989–2015. Journal of Peace Research, 53(5), 727–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Posner, R. A. (1995). Aging and old age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Potter, P. B. (2007). Does experience matter? American presidential experience, age, and international conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(3), 351–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Przeworski, A. (1999). Minimal democracy: A defense. In Ian Shapiro & Casiano Hacker-Cordón (Eds.), Democracy’s value (pp. 23–55). Cambridge, U.K.; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Read, K. E. (1959). Leadership and consensus in a New Guinea society. American Anthropologist, 51(3), 425–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York, NY: Harper.Google Scholar
  47. Simmons, L. W. (1945). The role of the aged in primitive societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Spencer, P. (1965). The Samburu: A study of gerontocracy in a Nomadic Tribe. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  49. Spisak, B. R. (2012). The general age of leadership: Older-looking presidential candidates win elections during war. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e36945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Spisak, B. R., Grabo, A. E., Arvey, R. D., & van Vugt, M. (2014). The age of exploration and exploitation: younger-looking leaders endorsed for change and older-looking leaders endorsed for stability. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 805–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stadelmann, D., Portmann, M., & Eichenberger, R. (2015). Military careers of politicians matter for national security policy. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 116, 142–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Svolik, M. W. (2012). The Politics of authoritarian rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tullock, G. (1987). Autocracy. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tullock, G. (2002). Undemocratic governments. Kyklos, 55(2), 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2015). World population prospects, 2015 revision: Life expectancy at birth (both sexes combined) by major area, region and country, 1950–2100.Google Scholar
  56. Volden, C., Wiseman, A. E., & Wittmer, D. E. (2013). When are women more effective lawmakers than men? American Journal of Political Science, 57(2), 326–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Von Kondratowitz, H. J. (2009). The long road to a moralisation of old age. In R. Edmondson & H. J. von Kondratowitz (Eds.), Valuing older people: A Humanist approach to ageing (pp. 107–122). London: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Walter, F., & Scheibe, S. (2013). A literature review and emotion-based model of age and leadership: New directions for the trait approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), 882–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Werner, D. (1981). Gerontocracy among the Mekranoti of Central Brazil. Anthropological Quarterly, 54(1), 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wittman, D. (2014). Strategic behavior and organizational structure in religions. British Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 717–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. World Bank. (2016). World Development Indicators.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sciences Po Grenoble, PACTEUniv. Grenoble AlpesSaint-Martin-d’HèresFrance
  2. 2.Sciences Po BordeauxCentre Emile DurkheimPessacFrance

Personalised recommendations