Skip to main content
Log in

The political economy of wage and price controls: evidence from the Nixon tapes

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In late July, 1971, Nixon reiterated his adamant opposition to wage and price controls calling them a scheme to socialize America. Yet, less than a month later, in a stunning reversal, he imposed the first and only peacetime wage and price controls in U.S. history. The Nixon tapes, personal tape recordings made during the presidency of Richard Nixon, provide a unique body of evidence to investigate the motivations for Nixon’s stunning reversal. We uncover and report in this paper evidence that Nixon manipulated his New Economic Policy to help secure his reelection victory in 1972. He became convinced that wage and price controls were necessary to grab the headlines away from the defeatist abandonment of the Bretton Woods Agreement and the closing of the U.S. gold window. Nixon understood the impact of his wage and price controls, but chose to trade off longer-term economic costs to the economy for his own short-term political gain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. From taped conversation 546–2, July 26, 1971, White House Tapes, Nixon Presidential Materials Staff, National Archives at College Park, MD. In addition to the recordings available at the National Archives and Records Administration, the Nixon tapes are also available online at the Miller Center: http://millercenter.org/presidentialrecordings.

  2. Ironically, review of the 1970 and 1971 Federal Open Market Committee minutes reveals that Burns consistently pressed for a more expansionary policy in spite of the stiff resistance he met from several inflation hawks on the FOMC.

  3. The Quadriad consisted of Nixon’s four chief economic advisers: Arthur F. Burns, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, Paul McCracken, Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, John B. Connally, Treasury Secretary, and George P. Shultz, director of the Office of Management and Budget.

  4. In an earlier conversation (542–4) Nixon did not want to include Volcker because the President was uncertain about Volcker’s position as Volcker was a Democrat.

  5. In conversation 553–6, Nixon tells Haldeman that “George [Shultz] is a free trader and he just hates to give up on the idea.” Haldeman responds “the one that bothers George the most is the closing the gold window and his line on it is probably …[it] will put you in the position of having to campaign as the President who devalued the dollar.” Shultz, in discussing the freezing of wages and prices, notes their political popularity but calls it an “administrative nightmare” destined to produce “serious distortions” (Shultz and Dam 1977, p. 69).

  6. Although Burns favored wage and price controls or an incomes policy, he opposed an outright freeze. Wells (1994, p. 63) quotes Burns: ‘There are times when in the dead hours of night, I find myself even thinking about a price and wage freeze. But when I rise and have a cup of coffee, I still don’t want one.”

  7. Haldeman (1994, p. 340) records that “…the British had asked for $3 billion to be converted into gold. If we gave it to them, other countries might follow suit. If we didn’t, they might wonder if we had enough gold to support the dollar. In either case, it was a major crisis.”

  8. Connally anticipates that Monday (August 16) was going to be a very bad day.

  9. Regardless of his economic knowledge, Connally’s political skills are impressive.

  10. Unfortunately, the tape quality is particularly poor at this point and the conversation becomes unintelligible.

  11. January 8, 2008 phone conversation between Volcker and one of the authors.

  12. Television News Archive, Vanderbilt University, CBS Evening News for Monday, November 15, 1971.

  13. Stein, “Wage and Price Controls: 25 Years Later,” http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB840060795168291000.

  14. Incredibly, Stein (Ibid.) goes on to write: “It was a rather flaky theory, and we were not prepared for the possibility that it was wrong.”

  15. In a phone interview Volcker recalled that he was unaware of the pressure Nixon exerted on Burns for an easy monetary policy. He was unhappy with the Fed’s policy, which he felt should be fighting inflation.

  16. Conversation 578–4, September 24, 1971.

  17. Abrams (2006) and Abrams and Butkiewicz (2012). Wells (1994, p. 51) also notes that Burns resisted any threat to the Fed’s independence.

  18. Conversation 469–9, March 18, 1971.

  19. Administration economists including Arthur Burns, Herb Stein and Paul Volcker wanted a freeze or controls to break inflationary expectations, but Nixon’s acceptance was politically motivated.

  20. Conversation 577–3, September 20, 1971.

  21. Conversation 584–3, October 5, 1971.

References

  • Abrams, B. A. (2006). How Richard Nixon pressured Arthur Burns: Evidence from the Nixon tapes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(4), 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, B. A. (2013). The terrible 10: A century of economic folly. Oakland: The Independent Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, B. A., & Butkiewicz, J. L. (2012). The political business cycle: New evidence from the Nixon tapes. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 44(2–3), 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Roubini, N., & Cohen, G. D. (1997). Political cycles and the macroeconomy. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Open Market Committee. (1971 and 1972). Minutes.

  • Friedman, M. (2006). Personal email to one of the authors.

  • Haldeman, H. R. (1994). The Haldeman Diaries. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. (1975). The political business cycle. Review of Economic Studies, 42(2), 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safire, W. (1975). Before the fall: An inside view of the pre-Watergate White House. New York: Da Capo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shultz, G. P., & Dam, K. W. (1977). Economic policy beyond the headlines. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, H. (1971). Interview on television news archive, Vanderbilt University, CBS evening news for Monday, November 15

  • Stein, H. (1996). Wage and price controls: 25 years later. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB840060795168291000. August 15.

  • The Nixon Tapes, The Miller Center, University of Virginia, Presidential Recordings Program: http://millercenter.org/presidentialrecordings.

  • Volcker, P.A. (2008). Personal telephone conversation with one of the authors. 8 Jan 2008.

  • Volcker, P. A., & Toyoo, G. (1992). Changing fortunes. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, W. C. (1994). Economist in an uncertain world: Arthur F. Burns and the Federal Reserve, 1970–1978. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yergin, D., & Stanislaw, J. (1998). The commanding heights: the battle between government and the marketplace that is remaking the modern world. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge helpful comments and suggestions from Saul Hoffman and Paul Volcker.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Burton A. Abrams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abrams, B.A., Butkiewicz, J.L. The political economy of wage and price controls: evidence from the Nixon tapes. Public Choice 170, 63–78 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0381-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0381-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation