Advertisement

Public Choice

, Volume 166, Issue 3–4, pp 291–313 | Cite as

Interjurisdictional competition and the Married Women’s Property Acts

  • Jayme S. Lemke
Article

Abstract

Married women in the early nineteenth century United States were not permitted to own property, enter into contracts without their husband’s permission, or stand in court as independent persons. This severely limited married women’s ability to engage in formal business ventures, collect rents, administer estates, and manage bequests through wills. By the dawn of the twentieth century, legal reform in nearly every state had removed these restrictions by extending formal legal and economic rights to married women. Legal reform being by nature a public good with dispersed benefits, what forces impelled legislators to undertake the costs of action? In this paper, I argue that interjurisdictional competition between states and territories in the nineteenth century was instrumental in motivating these reforms. Two conditions are necessary for interjurisdictional competition to function: (1) law-makers must hold a vested interest in attracting population to their jurisdictions, and (2) residents must be able to actively choose between the products of different jurisdictions. Using evidence from the passage of the Married Women’s Property Acts, I find that legal reforms were adopted first and in the greatest strength in those regions in which there was active interjurisdictional competition.

Keywords

Interjurisdictional competition Decentralization Competitive governance Married Women’s Property Acts Property rights Women’s rights 

JEL Classification

H77 K11 N4 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thank you to Chris Coyne, Pete Boettke, Pete Leeson, Tyler Cowen, Adam Martin, Michael Thomas, Katherine Fidler, Rachel Coyne, Bill Shughart, Virgil Storr, and the participants in the Mercatus Center’s Graduate Student Paper Workshop for many valuable comments and conversations. I am also grateful for the thoughtful and useful feedback of three anonymous reviewers. Any remaining errors are my own. I also wish to thank the Mercatus Center and the Institute for Humane Studies for their support at various stages in the development of this research.

References

  1. Abbott, E. (1969 [1910]). Women in industry; a study in American economic history. New York: Arno & The New York Times.Google Scholar
  2. Ashley, J. M. (1870). Circular of the Montana immigrant association. Library of Congress American Time Capsule Printed Ephemera Collection; Portfolio 86, Folder 27a.Google Scholar
  3. Basch, N. (1979). Invisible women: The legal fiction of marital unity in nineteenth-century America. Feminist Studies, 5(2), 346–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basch, N. (1986). The emerging legal history of women in the United States: Property, divorce, and the constitution. Signs, 12(1), 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baysinger, B. D., & Butler, H. N. (1985). The role of corporate law in the theory of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics, 28(1), 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bebchuk, L. A. (1992). Federalism and the corporation: The desirable limits on state competition in corporate law. Harvard Law Review, 105(7), 1435–1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Besley, T., & Case, A. C. (1995). Incumbent behavior: Vote seeking, tax setting and yardstick competition. American Economic Review, 85, 25–45.Google Scholar
  8. Blackstone, W. (1765). Commentaries on the laws of England: Book the first. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Boettke, P. J., Coyne, C. J., & Leeson, P. T. (2011). Quasimarket failure. Public Choice, 149(1–2), 209–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borneman, W. R. (2010). Rival rails: “The race to build America’s greatest transcontinental railroad”. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  11. Bratton, W. W., & McCahery, J. A. (1997). The new economics of jurisdictional competition: Devolutionary federalism in a second-best world. Georgetown Law Journal, 86, 201–278.Google Scholar
  12. Braun, S., & Kvasnicka, M. (2013). Men, women, and the ballot: Gender imbalances and suffrage extensions in U.S. states. Explorations in Economic History, 50(3), 405–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1980). The power to tax: Analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, D. (1958). The gentle tamers: Women of the old wild west. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
  15. Brown, D. (1977). Hear that lonesome whistle blow: Railroads in the west. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  16. Butler, H. N. (1985). Nineteenth-century jurisdictional competition in the granting of corporate privileges. Journal of Legal Studies, 14(1), 129–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cain, L. P. (2006). Table Df874-881, “Railroad mileage and equipment: 1830–1890”, and Table Df927-955, “Railroad mileage, equipment, and passenger traffic and revenue: 1890–1980”. In S. B. Carter, et al. (Eds.), Historical statistics of the United States, earliest times to the present (Millennial ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Central Pacific and Union Pacific Railroad timetables; information for travelers; passenger, excursion, & emigrant fare schedules; Pullman & Silver Palace Car rates; steamer, stage, & rail connections; route map. (1882, May 1). Central Pacific Railroad Photographic History Museum. Retrieved from http://cprr.org/Museum/Ephemera/CP-UP_Timetable_1882.html.
  19. Chused, R. H. (1982). Married women’s property law: 1800–1850. Georgetown Law Journal, 71, 1359–1425.Google Scholar
  20. Crowley, G. R., & Sobel, R. S. (2011). Does fiscal decentralization constrain Leviathan? New evidence from local property tax competition. Public Choice, 149(1–2), 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Doepke, M., & Tertilt, M. (2009). Women’s liberation: What’s in it for men? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), 1541–1591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Downes, R. C. (1931). The statehood contest in Ohio. The Mississippi Valley Historical Review, 18(2), 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Easterbrook, F. H. (1983). Antitrust and the economics of federalism. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(1), 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Easterbrook, F. H., & Fischel, D. R. (1991). The economic structure of corporate law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Epple, D., & Zelenitz, A. (1981). The roles of jurisdictional competition and of collective choice institutions in the market for local public goods. The American Economic Review, 71(2), 87–92.Google Scholar
  26. Fernandez, R. (2012). Women’s rights and development. Journal of Economic Growth, 19(1), 37–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fleck, R. K., & Hanssen, F. A. (2010). “Rulers ruled by women”: An economic analysis of the rise and fall of women’s rights in ancient Sparta. Economics of Governance, 3(10), 221–245.Google Scholar
  28. Foner, P. S. (Ed.). (1977). The factory girls: A collection of writings on life and struggles in the New England factories of the 1840s by the factory girls themselves, and the story, in their own words, of the first trade unions of women workers in the United States. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  29. Friedman, L. M. (1973). A history of American law. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  30. Geddes, R., & Lueck, D. (2002). The gains from self-ownership and the expansion of women’s rights. The American Economic Review, 92(4), 1079–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Geddes, R., & Tennyson, S. (2012). Passage of the Married Women’s Property Acts and Earnings Acts in the United States: 1850 to 1920. Research in Economic History, 29, 145–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ginger, R. (1954). Labor in a Massachusetts cotton mill, 1853–60. The Business History Review, 28(1), 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goetzmann, W. H. [1959] /1979. Army Exploration in the American West, 1803-1863. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  34. Goldin, C. (1990). Understanding the gender gap: An economic history of American women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Haines, M. R. (2006). Tables Aa2244-2340 through Aa6500-6550. In S. B. Carter, et al. (Eds.), Historical statistics of the United States, earliest times to the present (Millennial ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Hallgarth, S. A. (1989). Women settlers on the frontier: Unwed, unreluctant, unrepentant. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 17(3/4), 23–34.Google Scholar
  37. Hartog, H. (2002). Man and wife in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hekman, J. S. (1980). The product cycle and New England textiles. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94(4), 697–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Historical Census Browser. (2004). Retrieved total population from the University of Virginia, Geospatial and Statistical Data Center. http://mapserver.lib.virginia.edu/.
  41. Hoff, J. (1991). Law, gender, and injustice: A legal history of U.S. women. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hoff, J. (2007). American women and the lingering implications of coverture. The Social Science Journal, 44(1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Horpedahl, J. (2011). Political exchange and the voting franchise: Universal democracy as an emergent process. Constitutional Political Economy, 22(3), 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jones, M. S. (1987). An historical geography of changing divorce law in the United States. New York: Garland Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  45. Kahan, M., & Kamar, E. (2002). The myth of state competition in corporate law. Stanford Law Review, 55(3), 679–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kleinberg, S. J. (1999). Women in the United States, 1830–1945. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lowell, J. A. (1848). Memoir of Patrick Tracy Jackson. New York: Merchants’ Magazine and Commercial Review.Google Scholar
  48. Moussalli, Stephanie D. (2008). The fiscal effects of statehood: New Mexico and Arizona, 1903–1919. Public Choice, 137(1–2), 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moussalli, S. D. (2012). The fiscal case against statehood: Accounting for statehood in New Mexico and Arizona. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  50. O’Hara, E. A., & Ribstein, L. E. (2009). The law market. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Oates, W. E. (1985). Searching for Leviathan: An empirical study. The American Economic Review, 75(4), 748–757.Google Scholar
  52. Oates, W. E., & Schwab, R. M. (1988). Economic competition among jurisdictions: Efficiency enhancing or distortion inducing? Journal of Public Economics, 35(3), 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M., & Warren, R. (1961). The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review, 55, 831–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Owens, K. N. (1987). The prizes of statehood. Montana: The Magazine of Western History, 37(4), 2–9.Google Scholar
  55. Poling-Kempes, L. (1989). The Harvey girls: Women who opened the West. New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar
  56. Rabkin, P. A. (1980). Fathers to daughters: The legal foundations of female emancipation. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  57. Richter, A. (2005). Home on the rails: Women, the railroad, and the rise of public domesticity. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  58. Robinson, H. H. ([1898] 1976). Loom and spindle, or life among the early mill girls. Kailua, HI: Press Pacifica.Google Scholar
  59. Rosenberg, C. M. (2011). The life and times of Francis Cabot Lowell, 1775–1817. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  60. Salmon, M. (1986). Women and the law of property in early America. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  61. Salmon, M. (1992). Women and property in South Carolina: The evidence from marriage settlements, 1730–1830. In N. F. Cott (Ed.), History of women in the United States: Historical articles on women’s lives and activities, Vol. 3: domestic relations and law (pp. 3–33). Munich: K.G. Saur.Google Scholar
  62. Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schlissel, L. ([1982] 2004). Women’s diaries of the westward journey. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  64. Sells, J. A. (2008). Stagecoaches across the American West 1850 to 1920. Blaine, WA: Hancock House.Google Scholar
  65. Shughart, W. F, I. I., & Tollison, R. D. (1985). Corporate chartering: An exploration in the economics of legal change. Economic Inquiry, 13, 585–599.Google Scholar
  66. Stansel, D. (2006). Interjurisdictional competition and local government spending in U.S. metropolitan areas. Public Finance Review, 34(2), 173–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sumner, H. L. (1910). Volume IX: History of women in industry in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  68. Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. United States Bureau of the Census. (1841). Compendium of the enumeration of the inhabitants and statistics of the United States, as obtained at the Department of State, from the returns of the sixth census. Washington, D.C.: Thomas Allen.Google Scholar
  70. United States Bureau of the Census. (1902). Twelfth census of the United States, taken in the year 1900: Census reports, Vol. VIII: Manufactures part II: States and territories. Washington, D.C.: United States Census Office.Google Scholar
  71. United States Bureau of the Census. (1913). Thirteenth census of the United States, taken in the year 1910: Census reports, Vol. VIII: Manufactures 1909: General report and analysis. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  72. Wagner, R. (2011). Municipal corporations, economic calculation, and political pricing: Exploring a theoretical antimony. Public Choice, 149, 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wagner, R. E., & Weber, W. E. (1975). Competition, monopoly, and the organization of government in metropolitan areas. Journal of Law and Economics, 18(3), 661–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Warbasse, E. B. (1987). The changing legal rights of married women 1800–1861. New York: Garland Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  75. Weiss, T. (2006). Free female gainful workers, by state: 1800–1900 [Age 16 and older]. In S. B. Carter et al. (Eds.), Table Ba128-176 in Historical statistics of the United States, earliest times to the present (Millennial ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Willoughby, W. F. (1905). Territories and dependencies of the United States. New York: Burr Publishing House.Google Scholar
  77. Zaher, C. (2002). When a woman’s marital status determined her legal status: A research guide on the common law doctrine of coverture. Law Library Journal, 94(3), 459–486.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mercatus Center at George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations