Citizens’ preferences about voting rules: self-interest, ideology, and sincerity
- 324 Downloads
This paper studies the determinants of citizens’ preferences for different electoral systems. We use data collected through a large internet-based quasi-experiment carried out during the 2012 French presidential election where we invited subjects to cast a vote for real candidates according to four voting rules: two-round (the official system), one-round, the alternative vote, and approval voting. After voting with each of the four voting rules, subjects were also asked to report which system they liked the most. We find that voters prefer systems that are beneficial to the candidate they prefer, that their preference for the official two-round system (weakly) depends on how they actually vote under this system, and that right-wing voters are more supportive of voting rules under which one can vote for only one candidate (one-round and two-round).
KeywordsElectoral system Quasi-experiment Citizens’ preferences
We thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council for financial support, Damien Bol and Laura Stephenson for comments on previous drafts, and Henry Milner for careful editing.
- Bol D. (2015). Electoral reform, values and party self-interest. Party Politics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Brams, S., & Fishburn, P. (1982). Approval voting. Boston: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
- Fink, E. (2000). Representation by deliberation: changes in the rules of deliberation in the U.S. House of Representatives. Journal of Politics, 62, 1109–1125.Google Scholar
- Katz, R. (2005). Why are there so many (or so few) electoral reforms? In M. Gallagher & P. Mitchell (Eds.), The politics of electoral systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Weber M. (2014). Choosing voting systems behind the veil of ignorance: a two-tier voting experiment. Timbergen Institute Discussion Paper 14-042/I.Google Scholar