Legitimacy and the cost of government
- First Online:
While previous research documents a negative relationship between government size and economic growth, suggesting an economic cost of big government, a given government size generally affects growth differently in different countries. As a possible explanation of this differential effect, we explore whether government legitimacy (measured by satisfaction with the way democracy works) influences how a certain government size affects growth. On the positive side, a government perceived as legitimate may “get away” with being big since legitimacy can affect behavioral response to, and therefore the economic growth cost of, taxation and government expenditures. On the negative side, perceived legitimacy may make voters less prone to acquire information, which in turn facilitates interest-group oriented or populist policies that harm growth. A panel-data analysis of up to 30 developed countries, in which two different measures of the size of government are interacted with government legitimacy, reveals that perceived legitimacy exacerbates a negative growth effect of government size in the long run. This could be interpreted as governments taking advantage of being regarded as legitimate in order to secure short-term support at a long-term cost to the economy.
KeywordsLegitimacy Economic growth Size of government Confidence Trust
JEL ClassificationE62 H11 H20 O43 Z13
- Blind, P. K. (2006). Building trust in government in the twenty-first century: Review of literature and emerging issues. Unpublished manuscript, UNDESA, New York.Google Scholar
- Buchanan, J. M. (1967). The fiscal illusion. Public finance in democratic process (pp. 126–142). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
- Caplan, B. (2007). The myth of the rational voter. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Chang, Y., Chu, Y., & Huang, M. (2006). The uneven growth of democratic legitimacy in East Asia. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(2), 246–255.Google Scholar
- Chanley, V. A., Rudolph, T. J., & Rahn, W. M. (2000). The origins and consequences of public trust in government: A time series analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(3), 239–256.Google Scholar
- Clark, J. R., & Lee, D. R. (2001). Is trust in government compatible with trustworthy government? In W. F. Shughart II & L. Razzolini (Eds.), The Elgar companion to public choice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Colombatto, E. (2014). A theory of institutional resilience. In T. Eisenberg & G. B. Ramello (Eds.), Research handbook on comparative law and economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- EuroBarometer (2013). Standard EuroBarometer, all editions 1973–2012. Online database. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm.
- Gwartney, J. D., Lawson, R. A., & Hall, J. (2012). Economic freedom of the world: 2012 annual report. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute.Google Scholar
- Heston, A., Summers, R., & Aten, B. (2012). Penn world tables version 7.1. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
- Murphy, K. M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Why is rent-seeking so costly to growth? American Economic Review, 83(2), 409–414.Google Scholar
- Nannestad, P., & Paldam, M. (1994). From the pocketbook of the welfare man: A pooled cross-section study of economic voting in Denmark, 1986–92. British Journal of Political Science, 27(1), 119–136.Google Scholar
- OECD (2013). OECD tax statistics. Database. Online database available at doi:10.1787/tax-data-en.
- Pitlik, H., & Kouba, L. (2014). Does social distrust always lead to a stronger support for government intervention? Policy paper no. 8, WWWforEurope, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
- Tyler, T. R. (2006b). Why people obey the law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- WDI (2013). World development indicators. Database. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar