Advertisement

Public Choice

, Volume 160, Issue 1–2, pp 45–63 | Cite as

Doctors with borders: occupational licensing as an implicit barrier to high skill migration

  • Brenton D. Peterson
  • Sonal S. Pandya
  • David Leblang
Article

Abstract

Research on the political economy of immigration overlooks the specificity of human capital in skilled occupations and its implications for immigration preferences and policymaking. Conclusions that skilled Americans are unconcerned about labor market competition from skilled migrants build on a simple dichotomy between high and low skill migrants. In this article we show that natives turn to occupational licensing regulations as occupation-specific protectionist barriers to skilled migrant labor competition. In practice, high skill natives face labor market competition only from those high-skill migrants who share their occupation-specific skills. Licensure regulations ostensibly serve the public interest by certifying competence, but they can simultaneously be formidable barriers to entry by skilled migrants. From a collective action perspective, skilled natives can more easily secure sub-national, occupation-specific policies than influence national immigration policy. We exploit the unique structure of the American medical profession that allows us to distinguish between public interest and protectionist motives for migrant physician licensure regulations. We show that over the 1973–2010 period states with greater physician control over licensure requirements imposed more stringent requirements for migrant physician licensure and, as a consequence, received fewer new migrant physicians. By our estimates over a third of all US states could reduce their physician shortages by at least 10 percent within 5 years just by equalizing migrant and native licensure requirements. This article advances research on the political economy of immigration and highlights an overlooked dimension of international economic integration: regulatory rent-seeking as a barrier to the cross-national mobility of human capital, and the public policy implications of such barriers.

Keywords

Occupational licensing High skill immigration Physician shortages US state politics Health care regulation Global human capital flows Skilled professions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

For their assistance with data collection, we are grateful to John Simanski and Michael Hoeferin of the Office of Immigration Statistics, US Department of Homeland Security, and Amber Dushman of the American Medical Association. We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the University of Virginia’s Bankard Fund for Political Economy and Quantitative Collaborative Seed Grant Initiative. For their thoughtful feedback and suggestions, we thank the editors of Public Choice, two anonymous reviewers, Christina Davis, Gary Freeman, Tim Garson, Jason Hicks, Eric Patashnik, Craig Volden, Gay Wehrli, Casey White, and participants at the 2012 Midwest Political Science Association and International Political Economy Society meetings.

References

  1. Akl, E. A., et al. (2007). The United States physician workforce and international medical graduates: Trends and characteristics. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(2), 264–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G.S. (2009). Human Capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Borjas, G. J. (1994). The economics of immigration. Journal of Economic Literature, 32, 1667–1717.Google Scholar
  4. Boulet, J. R., et al. (2006). The international medical graduate pipeline: Recent trends in certification and residency training. Health Affairs, 25(2), 469–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Broscheid, A., & Teske, P. (2003). Public members on medical licensing boards and the choice of entry barriers. Public Choice, 114(3), 445–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpenter, D. P. (1996). Adaptive signal processing, hierarchy, and budget control in federal regulation. American Political Science Review, 90(2), 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coren, J. S. (2007). A moonlighting position can help you hone your medical skills while boosting your income. Family Practice Management, 14(3), 41–44.Google Scholar
  8. Council of State Governments. (1952). Occupational licensing legislation in the states. Chicago: The Council of State Governments.Google Scholar
  9. Culler, S. D., & Bazzoli, G. J. (1985). The moonlighting decisions of resident physicians. Journal of Health Economics, 4(3), 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dill, M. J., & Salsberg, E. S. (2008). The complexities of physician supply and demand: Projections through 2025. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.Google Scholar
  11. Dorsey, E. R., Nicholson, S., & Frist, W. H. (2011). Commentary: Improving the supply and distribution of primary care physicians. Academic Medicine, 86(5), 541–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Epstein, D., & O’Halloran, S. (1996). Divided government and the design of administrative procedures: A formal model and empirical test. Journal of Politics, 58(2), 373–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Facchini, G., & Mayda, A. M. (2008). From individual attitudes towards migrants to migration policy outcomes: Theory and evidence. IZA Working Paper No. 3512.Google Scholar
  14. Facchini, G., & Mayda, A. M. (2012). Individual attitudes towards skilled migration: An empirical analysis across countries. The World Economy, 35(2), 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frieden, J. A. (1991). Invested interests: The politics of national economic policies in a world of global finance. International Organization, 45(4), 425–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Friedman, M., & Kuznets, S. (1945). Income from independent professional practice. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  17. Goodson, J. D. (2010). Patient protection and Affordable Care Act: Promise and peril for primary care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 152(11), 742–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gozu, A., Kern, D. E., & Wright, S. M. (2009). Similarities and differences between international medical graduates and U.S. medical graduates at six Maryland community-based internal medicine residency training programs. Academic Medicine, 84(3), 385–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graddy, E. (1991). Interest groups or the public interest: Why do we regulate health occupations? Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 16(1), 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (2001). Special interest politics. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hainmueller, J., & Hiscox, M. J. (2007). Educated preferences: Explaining individual attitudes toward immigration in Europe. International Organization, 61(2), 399–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hainmueller, J., & Hiscox, M. J. (2010). Attitudes toward highly skilled and low skilled immigration: Evidence from a survey experiment. American Political Science Review, 104(01), 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hanson, G. H., Scheve, K., & Slaughter, M. J. (2007). Public finance and individual preferences over globalization strategies. Economics and Politics, 19(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hanson, G. H., Scheve, K., & Slaughter, M. J. (2009). Individual preferences over high-skilled immigration in the United States. In Jagdish Bhagwati & Gordon Hanson (Eds.), Skilled immigration today: Prospects, problems and policies (pp. 207–243). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hiscox, M. J. (2002). Commerce, coalitions and factor mobility: Evidence from congressional votes on trade legislation. American Political Science Review, 96(3), 593–608.Google Scholar
  26. Hunt, K. R., Hillman, B. J., & Witzke, D. B. (1992). Moonlighting during the radiology residency. Investigative Radiology, 27(11), 978–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Iversen, T. (2005). Capitalism, democracy and welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2001). An asset theory of social policy preferences. American Political Science Review, 95(4), 875–894.Google Scholar
  29. Jolly, P., et al. (2011). Participation in U.S. graduate medical education by graduates of international medical schools. Academic Medicine, 86(5), 559–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. King, M., et al. (2010). Integrated public use microdata series, current population survey: Version 3.0 [database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  31. Kleiner, M. M. (2000). Occupational licensing. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kleiner, M. M., & Krueger, A. B. (2010). The prevalence and effects of occupational licensing. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(4), 676–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kugler, A. D., & Sauer, R. M. (2005). Doctors without borders? Relicensing requirements and negative selection in the market for physicians. Journal of Labor Economics, 23(3), 437–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Law, M. T., & Kim, S. (2005). Specialization and regulation: The rise of professionals and the emergence of occupational licensing regulation. The Journal of Economic History, 65(03), 723–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leland, H. E. (1979). Quacks, lemons, and licensing: A theory of minimum quality standards. The Journal of Political Economy, 87(6), 1328–1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lewis, D. E. (2003). Presidents and the politics of agency design: Political insulation in the United States government bureaucracy, 1946–1997. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Li, J., Tabor, R., & Martinez, M. (2000). Survey of moonlighting practices and work requirements of emergency medicine residents. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18(2), 147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mattoo, A., & Carzaniga, A. G. (Eds.). (2003). Moving people to deliver services. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  39. McGirr, J., Williams, J. M., & Prescott, J. E. (1998). Physicians in rural West Virginia emergency departments: Residency training and board certification status. Academic Emergency Medicine, 5(4), 333–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mick, S. S., Lee, S. Y. D., & Wodchis, W. P. (2000). Variations in geographical distribution of foreign and domestically trained physicians in the United States: “Safety nets” or “surplus exacerbation”? Social Science and Medicine, 50(2), 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Milner, H., & Tingley, D. (2011). The economic and political influences on different dimensions of United States immigration policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.Google Scholar
  42. Morrison, J., & Wickersham, P. (1998). Physicians disciplined by a state medical board. Journal of the American Medical Association, 279(23), 1889–1893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Norcini, J. J., et al. (2010). Evaluating the quality of care provided by graduates of international medical schools. Health Affairs, 29(8), 1461–1468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics, 19(2), 211–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Plascencia, L. F. B., Freeman, G. P., & Setzler, M. (2003). The decline of barriers to immigrant economic and political rights in the American states: 1977–2001. International Migration Review, 37(1), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Polsky, D., et al. (2002). Initial practice locations of international medical graduates. Health Services Research, 37(4), 907–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Santos Silva, J. M. C., & Tenreyo, S. (2010). On the existence of the maximum likelihood estimates in Poisson regression. Economics Letters, 107, 310–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Silliman, R. A., et al. (1987). Debt, moonlighting and career decisions among internal medicine residents. Journal of Medical Education, 62(6), 463–469.Google Scholar
  50. Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Svorny, S., & Toma, E. F. (1998). Entry barriers and medical board funding autonomy. Public Choice, 97(1/2), 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tenn, S. A. (2001). Three essays on the relationship between migration and occupational licensing. Chicago: The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  53. Weingast, B. R. (1980). Physicians, DNA research scientists and the market for lemons. In Blair and Rubin (Eds.), Regulating the professions. Washington, DC: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  54. Weingast, B. R., & Moran, M. J. (1983). Bureaucratic discretion or congressional control? Regulatory policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission. Journal of Political Economy, 91(5), 765–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wharam, J.F., et al. (2007). Emergency department use and subsequent hospitalizations among members of a high-deductible health plan. Journal of the American Medical Association, 297(10), 1093-1102.Google Scholar
  56. Whelan, G. P., et al. (2002). The changing pool of international medical graduates seeking certification training in US graduate medical education programs. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(9), 1079–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wood, B. D., & Waterman, R. W. (1991). The dynamics of political control of the bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 85(3), 801–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yoo, P. S., et al. (2009). AVAS Best Clinical Resident Award (Tied): Fate of non-designated preliminary general surgery residents seeking a categorical residency position. The American Journal of Surgery, 198, 593–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yu, K.-H., & Levy, F. (2010). Offshoring professional services: Institutions and professional control. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(4), 758–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brenton D. Peterson
    • 1
  • Sonal S. Pandya
    • 1
  • David Leblang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PoliticsUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations