Public Choice

, Volume 161, Issue 1–2, pp 183–207 | Cite as

Do the personal characteristics of finance ministers affect changes in public debt?

  • Marc-Daniel Moessinger


Using a unique dataset of the personal characteristics of national finance ministers in Western Europe (1980–2010), I show that a finance minister’s experience affects the national debt-to-GDP ratio. The increase in the debt-to-GDP ratio is smaller if the finance minister stays in office for an additional year. This result is robust to the inclusion of the personal characteristics of prime ministers and a measure of political stability. However, the magnitude of the effect is sensitive to how finance ministers are selected in the econometric model when more than one minister holds office during a particular year. The estimation of interaction terms further reveals that experience particularly matters in election years or in times of negative GDP growth because an experienced finance minister has the power to restrict the usual increase in the debt-to-GDP ratio. In contrast, a finance minister’s educational background and ideological leaning have no significant impact on the debt-to-GDP ratio.


Public finance Public debt Finance minister Personal characteristics 

JEL Classification

D78 H30 H62 



I am grateful to two anonymous reviewers and the Editor-in-Chief, William F. Shughart II, for their very helpful suggestions, which have significantly improved the paper. Furthermore, I thank Etienne Farvaque, Jakob de Haan, Friedrich Heinemann, Tanja Hennighausen, Konrad Stahl and Mustafa Yeter, my colleagues at the ZEW, as well as session participants at the annual meeting of the Verein für Socialpolitik 2011, the 2nd World Congress of the Public Choice Societies 2012, the 68th Congress of the International Institute of Public Finance 2012 and the 18th Spring Meeting of Young Economists 2013 for their valuable comments. Research assistance from Elisabeth Artmann, Marius Maximilian Benden, and Laura Renner is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. Besley, T., Montalvo, J. G., & Reynal-Querol, M. (2011). Do educated leaders matter? The Economic Journal, 121, 205–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borge, L.-E. (2005). Strong politicians, small deficits: Evidence from Norwegian local governments. European Journal of Political Economy, 21(2), 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14, 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brender, A., & Drazen, A. (2008). How do budget deficits and economic growth affect reelection prospects? Evidence from a large panel of countries. American Economic Review, 98(5), 2203–2220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cusack, T. R. (1997). Partisan politics and public finance: Changes in public spending in the industrialized democracies, 1955–1989. Public Choice, 91(3), 375–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Haan, J., Jong-A-Pin, R., & Mierau, J. O. (2013). Do budgetary institutions mitigate the common pool problem? New empirical evidence for the EU. Public Choice, 156(3–4), 423–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Haan, J., & Sturm, J.-E. (1994). Political and institutional determinants of fiscal policy in the European community. Public Choice, 80(1–2), 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Haan, J., & Sturm, J.-E. (1997). Political and economic determinants of OECD budget deficits and government expenditures: A reinvestigation. European Journal of Political Economy, 13(4), 739–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Debrun, X., Moulin, A., Turrini, J. A.-i.-C., & Kumar, M. (2008). Tied to the mast? National fiscal rules in the European Union. Economic Policy, 23(54), 297–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Empirical evidence from a new index. Applied Economics, 38(10), 1091–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dreher, A., Gaston, N., & Martens, P. (2008). Measuring globalization—gauging its consequences. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Dreher, A., Lamla, M. J., Rupprecht, S. M., & Somogyi, F. (2009). The impact of political leaders’ profession and education on reforms. Journal of Comparative Economics, 37, 169–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edin, P.-A., & Ohlsson, H. (1991). Political determinants of budget deficits: Coalition effects versus minority effects. European Economic Review, 35(8), 1597–1603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Farvaque, E., Hammadou, H., & Stanek, P. (2011). Selecting your inflation targeters: Background and performance of monetary policy committee members. German Economic Review, 12(2), 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feld, L. P., & Kirchgässner, G. (2001). Does direct democracy reduce public debt? Evidence from Swiss municipalities. Public Choice, 109(3–4), 347–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feld, L. P., & Schaltegger, C. A. (2010). Political stability and fiscal policy time series evidence for the Swiss federal level since 1849. Public Choice, 144(3), 505–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Göhlmann, S., & Vaubel, R. (2007). The educational and occupational background of central bankers and its effect on inflation: An empirical analysis. European Economic Review, 51(4), 925–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hahm, S. D., Kamlet, M. S., & Mowery, D. C. (1996). The political economy of deficit spending in nine industrialized parliamentary democracies: The role of fiscal institutions. Comparative Political Studies, 29(1), 52–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hallerberg, M., Strauch, R., & von Hagen, J. (2007). The design of fiscal rules and forms of governance in European Union countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(2), 338–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hallerberg, M., Strauch, R., & von Hagen, J. (2009). Fiscal governance in Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hallerberg, M., & von Hagen, J. (1999). Electoral institutions, cabinet negotiations, and budget deficits. In J. M. Poterba & J. Von Hagen (Eds.), Fiscal institutions and fiscal performance (pp. 209–232). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hallerberg, M., & Wolff, G. B. (2008). Fiscal institutions, fiscal policy and sovereign risk premia in EMU. Public Choice, 136(3–4), 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heinemann, F., Mohl, P., & Osterloh, S. (2009). Who’s affraid of an EU tax and why?-revenue system preferences in the European parliament. Review of International Organizations, 4, 73–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jaimovich, D., & Panizza, U. (2006). Public debt around the world: A new dataset of central government debt. Washington: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
  25. Jochimsen, B., & Nuscheler, R. (2010). The political economy of the German Länder deficits: Weak governments meet strong finance ministers. Applied Economics, 43(19), 2399–2415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jochimsen, B., & Thomasius, S. (2012). The perfect finance minister: Whom to appoint as finance minister to balance the budget? DIW Discussion Papers No. 1188.Google Scholar
  27. Jones, B. F., & Olken, B. A. (2005). Do leaders matter? National leadership and growth since World War II. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 835–864.Google Scholar
  28. Klomp, J., & de Haan, J. (2013a). Do political budget cycles really exist? Applied Economics, 45, 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klomp, J., & de Haan, J. (2013b). Political budget cycles and election outcomes. Public Choice, 157(1–2), 245–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Neck, R., & Getzner, M. (2001). Politico-economic determinants of public debt growth: A case study for Austria. Public Choice, 109(3–4), 243–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1417–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. O’Roark, J. B., & Wood, W. C. (2011). Determinants of congressional minimum support: The role of economic education. Public Choice, 147, 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Perotti, R., & Kontopoulos, Y. (2002). Fragmented fiscal policy. Journal of Public Economics, 86(2), 191–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roubini, N., & Sachs, J. D. (1989a). Government spending and budget deficits in the industrial countries. Economic Policy, 4(1), 99–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roubini, N., & Sachs, J. D. (1989b). Political and economic determinants of budget deficits in the industrial democracies. European Economic Review, 33(5), 903–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shi, M., & Svensson, J. (2006). Political budget cycles: Do they differ across countries and why? Journal of Public Economics, 90(8–9), 1367–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Somogyi, F. (2010, December). Essays in political economy and fiscal policy. KOF Dissertation Series No. 5, Zurich.Google Scholar
  38. Swank, O. H. (2002). Budgetary devices for curbing spending prone ministers and bureaucrats. Public Choice, 111, 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van der Ploeg, F. (2010). Political economy of prudent budgetary policy. International Tax and Public Finance, 17, 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Volkerink, B., & de Haan, J. (2001). Fragmented government effects on fiscal policy: New evidence. Public Choice, 109(3–4), 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. von Hagen, J. (2002). Fiscal rules, fiscal institutions, and fiscal performance. The Economic and Social Review, 33(3), 263–284.Google Scholar
  42. von Hagen, J., Hallett, A. H., & Strauch, R. (2001). Budgetary consolidation in EMU. CEPR Economic Papers, 148, 140.Google Scholar
  43. Woldendorp, J., Keman, H., & Budge, I. (2011). Party government in 40 democracies 19452008. Compositiondurationpersonnel.
  44. Woo, J. (2003). Economic, political, and institutional determinants of public deficits. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 387–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW Mannheim)MannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations