Advertisement

Public Choice

, Volume 157, Issue 3–4, pp 367–385 | Cite as

The VP-function revisited: a survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after over 40 years

  • Michael S. Lewis-Beck
  • Mary Stegmaier
Article

Abstract

Nannestad and Paldam (Public Choice 79:213–245, 1994) published herein an extremely influential review of the literature linking economics and elections, what they called the “VP functions.” In that work, they offered a number of conclusions, in proposition form, about the state of the evidence in this field. We present the key ones (16 in all), and assess the extent to which they continue to hold, in light of the new evidence about what has come to be known as economic voting. As shall be shown, Nannestad and Paldam were prescient in their early establishment of many of the principal results explaining how the economy moves the vote choice.

Keywords

Economic voting Elections Popularity Vote functions Government support 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The contributions of Martin Paldam to the fields of economics and political science are many. For us, foremost are his contributions to economic voting, that is, to tracing out the lines of connection between the economy and the democratic vote. His early work is well-represented in his seminal paper with Peter Nannestad, a paper honored in the review at hand. Martin’s work was pioneering, and most of his key findings have withstood the test of time as this review demonstrates. Moreover, his current efforts continue to shape the research agenda of political economists the world over. To Martin Paldam we scholars of economic voting owe a great debt.

References

  1. Alvarez, R. M., & Nagler, J. (1995). Economics, issues and the Perot candidacy: voter choice in the 1992 presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 714–744. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, C. (1995). Blaming the government: citizens and the economy in five European democracies. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe. Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, C. J. (2000). Economic voting and political context: a comparative perspective. Electoral Studies, 19, 151–170. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bélanger, É., & Meguid, B. M. (2008). Issue salience, issue ownership, and issue-based vote choice. Electoral Studies, 27, 477–491. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellucci, P., & Lewis-Beck, M. S. (2011). A stable popularity function? Cross-national analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 50, 190–211. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bengtsson, Å. (2004). Economic voting: the effect of political context, volatility and turnout on voters’ assignment of responsibility. European Journal of Political Research, 43, 749–767. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benton, A. L. (2005). Dissatisfied democrats or retrospective voters? Economic hardship, political institutions, and voting behavior in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 38, 417–442. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blendon, R. J., Benson, J. M., Brodie, M., Morin, R., Altman, D. E., Gitterman, D., Brossard, M., & James, M. (1997). Bridging the gap between the public’s and economists’ views of the economy. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(3), 105–118. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borre, O. (1997). Economic voting in Danish electoral surveys 1987–1994. Scandinavian Political Studies, 20, 347–365. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bratton, M., Bhavnani, R., & Chen, T. H. (2012). Voting intentions in Africa: ethnic, economic or partisan. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 50, 27–52. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, J. E., Dettrey, B. J., & Yin, H. (2010). The theory of conditional retrospective voting: does the presidential record matter less in open-seat elections? The Journal of Politics, 72, 1083–1095. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carlsen, F. (2000). Unemployment, inflation and government popularity—are there partisan effects? Electoral Studies, 19, 141–150. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chappell, H. W. Jr., & Veiga, L. G. (2000). Economics and elections in Western Europe: 1960–1997. Electoral Studies 19, 183–197. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clarke, H. D., & Stewart, M. C. (1994). Prospections, retrospections, and rationality: the “bankers” model of presidential approval reconsidered. American Journal of Political Science, 38, 1104–1123. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Conover, P. J., Feldman, S., & Knight, K. (1986). Judging inflation and unemployment: the origins of retrospective evaluations. The Journal of Politics, 48, 565–588. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dassonneville, R., & Lewis-Beck, M. S. (2012). Macroeconomics, economic crisis and electoral outcomes: A national European pool. Paper presented at the Political Science Department, KU Leuven, Belgium conference on Whatever Happened to Incumbency? November 22, 2012. Google Scholar
  17. Debus, M., Stegmaier, M., & Tosun, J. (2013). Economic voting under coalition governments: Evidence from Germany. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Meeting, Chicago, IL. April 2013. Google Scholar
  18. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row. Google Scholar
  19. Duch, R. M. (2001). A developmental model of heterogeneous economic voting in new democracies. The American Political Science Review, 95, 895–910. Google Scholar
  20. Duch, R. M. (2007). Comparative studies of the economy and the vote. In C. Boix & S. C. Stokes (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative politics (pp. 805–844). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  21. Duch, R. M., & Stevenson, R. T. (2008). The economic vote: how political and economic institutions condition election results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duch, R. M., & Stevenson, R. (2010). The global economy, competency, and the economic vote. The Journal of Politics, 72, 105–123. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fair, R. C. (1978). The effect of economic events on votes for president. Review of Economics and Statistics, 60, 159–172. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fauvelle-Aymar, C., & Stegmaier, M. (2013, forthcoming). The stock market and U.S. presidential approval. Electoral Studies. Google Scholar
  25. Fernández-Albertos, J. (2006). Does internationalization blur responsibility? Economic voting and economic openness in 15 European countries. West European Politics, 29, 28–46. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fidrmuc, J. (2000). Economics of voting in post-communist countries. Electoral Studies, 19, 199–217. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fiorina, M. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven: Yale University Press. Google Scholar
  28. Fournier, P., Blais, A., Nadeau, R., Gidengil, E., & Nevitte, N. (2003). Issue importance and performance voting. Political Behavior, 25, 51–67. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goodhart, C. A. E., & Bhansali, R. J. (1970). Political economy. Political Studies, 18, 43–106. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Haller, H. B., & Norpoth, H. (1997). Reality bites: news exposure and economic opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 555–575. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hellwig, T. (2001). Interdependence, government constraints, and economic voting. The Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1141–1162. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hellwig, T. (2010). Elections and the economy. In L. LeDuc, R.G. Niemi, P. Norris (Eds.), Comparing democracies 3: elections and voting in the 21st century (pp. 185–201). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Google Scholar
  33. Hetherington, M. (1996). The media’s role in forming voters’ national economic evaluations in 1992. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 372–395. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hibbs, D. A. (2012). Obama’s reelection prospects under “bread and peace” voting in the 2012 US presidential election. PS, Political Science & Politics, 45, 635–639. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Holbrook, T., & Garand, J. (1996). Homo economus? Economic information and economic voting. Political Research Quarterly, 49, 351–375. Google Scholar
  36. Jérôme, B., Jérôme, V., & Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1999). Polls fail in France: forecasts of the 1997 legislative election. International Journal of Forecasting, 15, 163–174. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Key, V. O. (1966). The responsible electorate. New York: Vintage. Google Scholar
  38. Kiewiet, D. R. (1983). Macroeconomics and micropolitics: the electoral effects of economic issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  39. Kiewiet, D. R., & Lewis-Beck, M. S. (2011). No man is an island: self-interest, the public interest, and sociotropic voting. Critical Review, 23(3), 303–319. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kinder, D. R., & Kiewiet, D. R. (1981). Sociotropic politics: the American case. British Journal of Political Science, 11, 129–161. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kramer, G. H. (1971). Short-term fluctuations in US voting behavior, 1896–1964. The American Political Science Review, 65, 131–143. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kramer, G. (1983). The ecological fallacy revisited: aggregate- versus individual-level findings on economics and elections, and sociotropic voting. The American Political Science Review, 77, 92–111. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lafay, J.-D. (1985). Important political change and the stability of the popularity function: before and after the French general election of 1981. In H. Eulau & M. S. Lewis-Beck (Eds.), Economic conditions and electoral outcomes: the United States and Western Europe (pp. 78–97). New York: Agathon. Google Scholar
  44. Lafay, J.-D. (1991). Political diarchy and popularity functions: lessons from the 1986 French experience. In H. Norpoth, M. S. Lewis-Beck, & J.-D. Lafay (Eds.), Economics and politics: the calculus of support (pp. 123–139). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar
  45. Lau, R. R. (1985). Two explanations for negativity effects in political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 119–138. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lewin, L. (1991). Self-interest and public interest in Western politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1986). Comparative economic voting: Britain, France, Germany, Italy. American Journal of Political Science, 30, 315–346. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1988). Economics and elections: the major western democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar
  49. Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1995). Comparaison de prévision des élections présidentielles en France et aux États-Unis. Journal de la Société de Statistique de Paris, 136(1), 29–45. Google Scholar
  50. Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1997). Who’s the chef? Economic voting under a dual executive. European Journal of Political Research, 31, 315–325. Google Scholar
  51. Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Nadeau, R. (2004). Dual governance and the economic vote: France and the United States. In M. S. Lewis-Beck (Ed.), The French voter: before and after the 2002 elections (pp. 136–154). Houndmills: Basingstoke. Google Scholar
  52. Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Nadeau, R. (2009). Obama and the economy in 2008. PS, Political Science & Politics, 43, 479–483. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Paldam, M. (2000). Economic voting: an introduction. Electoral Studies, 19(2–3), 113–121. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Ratto, M. C. (2013, forthcoming). Economic voting in Latin America: a general model. Electoral Studies. Google Scholar
  55. Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Rice, T. W. (1992). Forecasting elections. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. Google Scholar
  56. Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Stegmaier, M. (2000). Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 183–219. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Stegmaier, M. (2007). Economic models of voting. In R. Dalton, & H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 518–537). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  58. Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Stegmaier, M. (2008). The economic vote in transitional democracies. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 18, 303–323. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Stegmaier, M. (2009). American voter to economic voter: evolution of an idea. Electoral Studies 28, 625–631. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Stegmaier, M. (2014, forthcoming). Election forecasting, scientific approaches. In J. Rokne, & R. Alhajj (Eds.), The encyclopedia of social network analysis and mining. New York: Springer. Google Scholar
  61. Lewis-Beck, M. S., Stubager, R., & Nadeau, R. (2013, forthcoming). The Kramer problem: micro-macro resolution with a Danish pool. Electoral Studies. Google Scholar
  62. Lewis-Beck, M. S. & Tien, C. (2011). Political and election forecasting. In M.P. Clements, & D.F. Hendry (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic forecasting (pp. 655–671). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  63. Lewis-Beck, M. S., Nadeau, R., & Bélanger, É. (2004). General election forecasts in the United Kingdom: a political economy model. Electoral Studies, 23, 279–290. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lewis-Beck, M. S., Nadeau, R., & Elias, A. (2008). Economics, party and the vote: causality issues and panel data. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 84–95. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lockerbie, B. (1992). Prospective voting in presidential elections, 1956–1988. American Politics Quarterly, 20, 308–325. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. MacKuen, M. B., Erikson, R. S., & Stimson, J. (1992). Peasants or bankers? The American electorate and the U.S. economy. The American Political Science Review, 86, 597–611. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mueller, J. E. (1973). War, presidents and public opinion. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
  68. Nadeau, R., & Lewis-Beck, M. S. (2001). National economic voting in U.S. presidential elections. The Journal of Politics, 63, 159–181. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Nadeau, R., Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Bélanger, É. (2009). Election forecasting in the United Kingdom: a two-step model. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 19, 333–358. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Nadeau, R., Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Bélanger, É. (2010). Electoral forecasting in France: a multi-equation solution. International Journal of Forecasting, 26, 11–18. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Nadeau, R., Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Bélanger, É. (2013, forthcoming). Economics and elections revisited. Comparative Political Studies. Google Scholar
  72. Nadeau, R., Niemi, R. G., & Yoshinaka, A. (2002). A cross-national analysis of economic voting: taking account of the political context across time and nations. Electoral Studies, 21, 403–423. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Nannestad, P., & Paldam, M. (1994). The VP function: a survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after 25 years. Public Choice, 79, 213–245. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nannestad, P., & Paldam, M. (1997). From the pocketbook of the welfare man: a pooled cross-section study of economic voting in Denmark, 1986–92. British Journal of Political Science, 27, 119–136. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Nannestad, P., & Paldam, M. (2000). Into Pandora’s box of economic evaluations: a study of the Danish macro VP-function, 1986–1997. Electoral Studies, 19, 123–140. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Norpoth, H. (1996a). The economy. In Laurence LeDuc, Richard G. Niemi, & Pippa Norris (Eds.), Comparing democracies: elections and voting in global perspective (pp. 299–318). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
  77. Norpoth, H. (1996b). Presidents and the prospective voter. The Journal of Politics, 58, 776–792. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pacek, A. C. (1994). Macroeconomic conditions and electoral politics in East Central Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 38, 723–744. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pacek, A. C., & Radcliff, B. (1995). The political economy of competitive elections in the developing world. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 745–759. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Paldam, M. (1991). How robust is the vote function? A study of seventeen nations over four decades. In H. Norpoth, M. S. Lewis-Beck, & J. D. Lafay (Eds.), Economics and politics: the calculus of support (pp. 9–31). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar
  81. Paldam, M. (2004). Vote and popularity functions. In C. K. Rowley & F. Schneider (Eds.), The encyclopedia of public choice (pp. 49–59). New York: Kluwer Academic. Google Scholar
  82. Powell, G. B. Jr., & Whitten, G. D. (1993). A cross-national analysis of economic voting: taking account of the political context. American Journal of Political Science 37, 391–414. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Price, S., & Sanders, D. (1995). Economic expectations and voting intentions in the UK, 1979–1989: a pooled cross-section approach. Political Studies, 43, 451–471. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Remmer, K. (1991). The political impact of economic crisis in Latin America in the 1980s. The American Political Science Review, 85, 777–800. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Roberts, A. (2008). Hyperaccountability: economic voting in Central and Eastern Europe. Electoral Studies, 27, 533–546. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sanders, D. (2000). The real economy and the perceived economy in popularity functions: how much do voters need to know? A study of British data, 1974–97. Electoral Studies, 19, 275–294. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Singer, M. M. (2011). Who says “It’s the economy”? Cross-national and cross-individual variation in the salience of economic performance. Comparative Political Studies, 44, 284–312. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Singer, M. M. (2013). Economic voting in an era of non-crisis: the changing electoral agenda in Latin America, 1982–2010. Comparative Politics, 45, 169–185. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Soroka, S. N. (2006). Good news and bad news: asymmetric responses to economic information. The Journal of Politics, 68, 372–385. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Stegmaier, M., & Lewis-Beck, M. S. (2013, forthcoming). Economic voting. In R. Valelly (Ed.), Oxford bibliographies in political science. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  91. Stegmaier, M., & Norpoth, H. (2013, forthcoming). Election forecasting. In R. Valelly (Ed.), Oxford bibliographies in political science. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  92. Tucker, J. A. (2001). Economic conditions and the vote for incumbent parties in Russia, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic from 1990 to 1996. Post-Soviet Affairs, 17(4), 309–331. Google Scholar
  93. Van der Brug, W., Van der Eijk, C., & Franklin, M. (2007). The economy and the vote: economic conditions and elections in fifteen countries. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Whitten, G. D., & Palmer, H. D. (1999). Cross-national analyses of economic voting. Electoral Studies, 18, 49–67. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wilkin, S., Haller, B., & Norpoth, H. (1997). From Argentina to Zambia: a world-wide test of economic voting. Electoral Studies, 16, 301–316. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wlezien, C., Franklin, M., & Twiggs, D. (1997). Economic perceptions and vote choice: disentangling the endogeneity. Political Behavior, 19, 7–17. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of IowaIowa CityUSA
  2. 2.University of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations