Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.
Ashworth, J., Galli, E., & Padovano, F. (2009). Government decentralization and public spending programs. Paper presented at the XXI conference of the Italian Society of Public Economics (SIEP).
Bahl, R., & Bird, R. (2008). Subnational taxes in developing countries: the way forward. Public Budgeting and Finance, 28(4), 1–25.
Bahl, R. W., & Linn, J. (1992). Urban public finance in developing countries. New York: Oxford University Press.
Banerjee, A., Dolado, J. J., Hendry, D. F., & Smith, G. W. (1986). Exploring equilibrium relationship in econometrics through static models: some Monte Carlo evidence. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 48(3), 253–277.
Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634–647.
Besley, T., & Case, A. (1995). Incumbent behaviour: vote-seeking, tax-setting and yardstick competition. American Economic Review, 85(1), 25–45.
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.
Boetti, L., Piacenza, M., & Turati, G. (2010). Decentralization and local governments’ performance: how does fiscal autonomy affect spending efficiency? Working Paper No. 11. Department of Economics and Public Finance.
Bordignon, M., & Minelli, E. (2001). Rules transparency and political accountability. Journal of Public Economics, 80(1), 73–98.
Borge, L. E., & Rattso, J. (2008). Property taxation as incentive for cost control: empirical evidence for utility services in Norway. European Economic Review, 52(6), 1035–1054.
Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. (1978). Tax instruments as constraints on the disposition of public revenues. Journal of Public Economics, 9(3), 301–318.
Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. (1980). The power to tax: analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Breton, A. (1987). Towards a theory of competitive federalism. European Journal of Political Economy, 3(1-2), 263–329.
Brülhart, M., & Jametti, M. (2006). Vertical versus horizontal tax externalities: an empirical test. Journal of Public Economics, 90(10–11), 2027–2062.
Cassette, A., & Paty, S. (2010). Fiscal decentralization and the size of government: a European country empirical analysis. Public Choice, 143(1–2), 173–189.
Crowley, G. R., & Sobel, R. S. (2011). Does fiscal decentralization constrain Leviathan? New evidence from local property tax competition. Public Choice, 149, 5–30.
De Mello, L. (2001). Fiscal federalism and government size in transition economies: the case of Moldova. Journal of International Development, 13, 255–268.
Dollery, B., & Worthington, A. (1996). The empirical analysis of fiscal illusion. Journal of Economic Surveys, 10(3), 261–297.
Ehdaie, J. (1994). Fiscal decentralization and the size of government, an extension with evidence from cross-country data. Policy Research Working Paper 1387. World Bank.
Fausto, D. (1996). Il federalismo fiscale: un falso rimedio nel caso italiano. Economia delle scelte pubbliche, 2–3, 175–196.
Feld, L. P., Kirchgässner, G., & Schaltegger, C. A. (2003). Decentralized taxation and the size of government: evidence from Swiss state and local governments. CESifo Working Paper Series 1087.
Fischel, W. A. (2001). The homevoter hypothesis: how home values influence local government taxation. School of Finance and Land-Use Policies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Fiva, J. H. (2006). New evidence on the effect of fiscal decentralization on the size and composition of government spending. FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis, 62(2), 250–280.
Forbes, K. F., & Zampelli, E. M. (1989). Is Leviathan a mythical beast? American Economic Review, 79(3), 568–577.
Glaeser, E. L. (1996). The incentive effects of property taxes on local governments. Public Choice, 89(1–2), 93–111.
Grossman, P. J. (1989). Fiscal decentralization and government size: an extension. Public Choice, 62(1), 63–69.
Grossman, P. J., & West, G. (1994). Federalism and the growth of government revisited. Public Choice, 79(1–2), 19–32.
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1997). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Working Paper. University of Cambridge.
Jin, J., & Zou, H. (2002). How does fiscal decentralization affect aggregate, national, and subnational government size. Journal of Urban Economics, 52(2), 270–293.
Keen, M., & Kotsogiannis, C. (2002). Does federalism lead to excessively high taxes? American Economic Review, 92(1), 363–370.
Keen, M., & Kotsogiannis, C. (2004). Tax competition in federations and the welfare consequences of decentralization. Journal of Urban Economics, 56(3), 397–407.
Keen, M., & Marchand, M. (1997). Fiscal competition and the pattern of public spending. Journal of Public Economics, 66(1), 33–53.
King, D. (1984). Fiscal tiers—the economics of multi-level government. London: Allen and Unwin.
Marlow, M. (1988). Fiscal decentralization and government size. Public Choice, 56(3), 259–269.
Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2008). Revenue assignments in the practice of fiscal decentralization. In N. Bosch & J. M. Durán (Eds.), Fiscal federalism and political decentralization: lessons from Spain, Germany, and Canada (pp. 27–55). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
McKenzie, R. B., & Staff, R. J. (1978). Revenue sharing and monopoly government. Public Choice, 33(3), 93–97.
McLure, C. E. (1998). Tax assignment problem: conceptual administrative considerations in achieving sub-national fiscal autonomy. Paper presented at the Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and Local Financial Management Course, Vienna, Austria.
Musgrave, R. (1959). The theory of public finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Musgrave, R. (1983). Who should tax, where and what. In C. E. McLure (Ed.), Tax assignment in federal countries (pp. 2–19). Centre for Research on Federal Financial Relations. Canberra: Australian National University.
Nelson, M. A. (1986). An empirical analysis of state and local tax structure in the context of the Leviathan model of government. Public Choice, 49(3), 283–294.
Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. Aldershot: Gregg Revivals.
Oates, W. E. (1985). Searching for Leviathan: an empirical study. American Economic Review, 75(4), 748–758.
Oates, W. E. (2001). Property taxation and local government finance. Essays in Honor of C. Lowell Harriss. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Oates, W. E. (2005). Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. International Tax and Public Finance, 12, 349–373.
OECD (2009a). The fiscal autonomy of sub-central governments: an update. Paris: Network on Fiscal Relations across Levels of Government.
OECD (2009b). Tax and grants: on the revenue mix of sub-central governments. Paris: Network on Fiscal Relations across Levels of Government.
Pereira, P. T. (2000). Fiscal decentralization, public sector size and the wealth of nations. In Economia Pùblica Regional e Local. Coimbra: APDR.
Prohl, S., & Schneider, F. (2009). Does decentralization reduce government size? A quantitative study of the decentralization hypothesis. Public Finance Review, 37(6), 639–664.
Rodden, J. (2003). Reviving Leviathan: fiscal federalism and the growth of government. Industrial Organization, 57(4), 695–729.
Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 997–1032.
Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: an introduction to “difference” and “system” GMM in Stata. Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136.
Salmon, P. (1987). Decentralization as an incentive scheme. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 3(2), 24–43.
Shadbegian, R. J. (1999). Fiscal federalism, collusion, and government size: evidence from the states. Public Finance Review, 27(3), 262–281.
Shah, A. (1999). Fiscal federalism and macroeconomic governance: for better or worse? Policy Research Working Paper No. 2005. World Bank.
Stein, E. (1999). Fiscal decentralization and government size in Latin America. Journal of Applied Economics, 11(2), 357–391.
Zax, J. S. (1988). The effects of jurisdiction types and numbers on local public finance. In H. S. Rosen (Ed.), Fiscal federalism: quantitative studies (pp. 79–106). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Zax, J. S. (1989). Is there a Leviathan in your neighborhood? American Economic Review, 79(3), 560–567.
Wallis, J. J. (1991). The political economy of new deal fiscal federalism. Economic Inquiry, 29(3), 510–524.
Wallis, J. J., & Oates, W. E. (1988). Decentralization in the public sector: an empirical study of state and local government. In H. S. Rosen (Ed.), Fiscal federalism: quantitative studies (pp. 5–32). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Weingast, B. R. (2009). Second generation fiscal federalism: the implication of fiscal incentives. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(3), 279–293.
Wickens, M. R., & Breusch, T. S. (1988). Dynamic specification, the long run and the estimation of transformed regression model. Economic Journal, 98(309), 189–205 (Supplement Conference Papers).
Winer, S. L. (1983). Some evidence on the effects of the separation of spending tax decisions. Journal of Political Economy, 91(1), 126–140.