Advertisement

Public Choice

, Volume 156, Issue 3–4, pp 387–408 | Cite as

The nationalization of electoral cycles in the United States: a wavelet analysis

  • Luís Aguiar-Conraria
  • Pedro C. Magalhães
  • Maria Joana Soares
Article

Abstract

We take a new look at electoral sectionalism and dynamic nationalization in presidential elections. We treat this problem as one of synchronism of electoral cycles, which we estimate by using wavelets. After providing a self-contained introduction to wavelet analysis, we use it to assess the degree and the dynamics of electoral synchronization in the United States. We determine clusters of states where electoral swings have been more and less in sync with each other and with the national cycle. Then, we analyze how the degree of synchronism of electoral cycles has changed through time, answering questions as to when, to what extent, and where has a tendency towards a “universality of political trends” in presidential elections been more strongly felt. We present evidence strongly in favor of an increase in the dynamic nationalization of presidential elections taking place since the 1950s, largely associated with a convergence in most (but not all) Southern states.

Keywords

Electoral cycles synchronism Nationalization Wavelet analysis 

JEL Classification

H70 C32 D72 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Earlier versions of this article were presented at the American Political Science Association meeting in September 2010, at the Department of Economics of the University of Minho, and at the Lisbon Group for Institutions and Public Policy of the Nova School of Business and Economics and the Institute of Social Sciences of the University of Lisbon. We are grateful for all the comments we received there. We thank the editors of Public Choice and three anonymous reviewers for the comments and suggestions they provided. We would also like to express our gratitude to Bernard Grofman, Paul A. Beck, Samuel Merrill, and Thomas L. Brunell for their comments to earlier versions of the paper and for their encouragement. Pedro C. Magalhães worked in this article while he was FLAD Visiting Professor at the Department of Government of Georgetown University, and wishes to thank and the department and the Luso-American Foundation for their support.

References

  1. Agnew, J. A. (1987). The United States in the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  2. Aguiar-Conraria, L., & Soares, M. J. (2011). Business cycle synchronization and the Euro: a wavelet analysis. Journal of Macroeconomics, 33(3), 477–489. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aguiar-Conraria, L., & Soares, M. J. (2013, forthcoming). The continuous wavelet transform: moving beyond uni and bivariate analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys. Google Scholar
  4. Aguiar-Conraria, L., Magalhães, P. C., & Soares, M. J. (2012a). Cycles in politics: Wavelet analysis of political time-series. American Journal of Political Science, 56(2), 500–518. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aguiar-Conraria, L., Martins, M. M. F., & Soares, M. J. (2012b). The yield curve and the macro-economy across time and frequencies. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 36(12), 1950–1970. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alvarez, R. M., & Nagler, J. (1995). Economics, issues, and the Perot candidacy: voter choice in the 1992 presidential election. American Journal of Political Science, 39(3), 714–744. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Archer, J. C., & Shelley, F. M. (1986). American electoral mosaics. Washington: Association of American Geographers. Google Scholar
  8. Archer, J. C., & Taylor, P. J. (1981). Section and party: a political geography of American presidential elections, from Andrew Jackson to Ronald Reagan. Chichester: Research Studies Press. Google Scholar
  9. Bartels, L. M. (1998). Electoral continuity and change, 1868–1996. Electoral Studies, 17(3), 301–326. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Black, M., & Black, E. (2010). Deep South politics: the enduring racial division in national elections. In C. S. Bullock III & M. J. Rozell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Southern politics (pp. 401–426). New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  11. Brady, D. W., D’Onofrio, R., & Fiorina, M. (2000). The nationalization of electoral forces revisited. In D. Brady, J. Cogan, & M. Fiorina (Eds.), Continuity and change in House elections (pp. 130–148). Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
  12. Burden, B. C., & Wichowsky, A. (2010). Local and national forces in congressional elections. In J. E. Leighley (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of American elections and political behavior (pp. 453–470). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  13. Cazelles, B., Chavez, M., Berteaux, D., Ménard, F., Vik, J. O., Jenouvrier, S., & Stenseth, N. (2008). Wavelet analysis of ecological time series. Oecologia, 156, 287–304. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Claggett, W., Flanigan, W., & Zingale, N. (1984). Nationalization of the American electorate. The American Political Science Review, 78(1), 77–91. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clotfelter, C. T., & Vavrichek, B. (1980). Campaign resource allocation and the regional impact of electoral college reform. Journal of Regional Science, 20, 311–329. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crowley, P. (2007). A guide to wavelets for economists. Journal of Economic Surveys, 21(2), 207–267. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elazar, D. J. (1994). The American mosaic: the impact of space, time, and culture on American politics. Boulder: Westview Press. Google Scholar
  18. Gallegati, M., Ramsey, J., & Semmler, W. (2011). The US wage Phillips curve across frequencies and over time. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 73, 489–508. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hayes, D., & McKee, S. C. (2008). Toward a one-party South? American Politics Research, 36(1), 3–32. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heppen, J. (2003). Racial and social diversity and U.S. presidential election regions. The Professional Geographer, 55, 191–205. Google Scholar
  21. Hero, R. E. (1998). Faces of inequality: social diversity in American politics. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  22. Kawato, S. (1987). Nationalization and partisan realignment in congressional elections. The American Political Science Review, 81(4), 1235–1250. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kennedy, P. (2008). A guide to econometrics (6th ed.). Cambridge: Wiley–Blackwell. Google Scholar
  24. Kousser, J. M. (2010). The immutability of categories and the reshaping of Southern politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 13, 365–383. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kruskal, J. B. (1964a). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29, 1–27. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kruskal, J. B. (1964b). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika, 29, 115–129. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lichtman, A. J. (1976). Critical election theory and the reality of American presidential politics, 1916–40. The American Historical Review, 81, 317–351. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lin, T.-M., & Guillén, M. (1998). The rising hazards of party incumbency: a discrete renewal analysis. Political Analysis, 7(1), 31–57. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mayhew, D. R. (2002). Electoral realignments: a critic of an American genre. New Haven: Yale University Press. Google Scholar
  30. McDonald, M. P. (2010). American voter turnout in historical perspective. In J. E. Leighley (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of American elections and political behavior (pp. 125–143). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  31. Merrill, S., Grofman, B., & Brunell, T. L. (2008). Cycles in American national electoral politics, 1854–2006: statistical evidence and an explanatory model. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 1–17. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morgenstern, S., Swindle, S. M., & Castagnola, A. (2009). Party nationalization and institutions. The Journal of Politics, 71(04), 1322–1341. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Murray, A. T. (2010). Quantitative geography. Journal of Regional Science, 50, 143–163. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nardulli, P.F. (1995). The concept of a critical realignment, electoral behavior, and political change. American Political Science Review, 89, 10–22. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Norpoth, H. (1995). Is Clinton doomed? An early forecast for 1996. PS: Political Science and Politics, 28(2), 201–207. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Petrocik, J. R. (1987). New party coalitions and the nationalization of the South. The Journal of Politics, 49(2), 347–375. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rohde, D. W. (1991). Parties and leaders in the postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rua, A. (2012). Money growth and inflation in the Euro area: a time-frequency view. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 74(6), 875–885. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schantz, H. L. (1992). The erosion of sectionalism in presidential elections. Polity, 24(3), 355–377. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semisovereign people. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Google Scholar
  41. Schudson, M. (1995). The power of news. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  42. Shafer, B. E., & Johnston, R. (2006). The end of Southern exceptionalism: class, race, and partisan change in the postwar South. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  43. Shelley, F. M., Archer, J. C., Davidson, F. M., & Brunn, S. D. (1996). Political geography of the United States. New York: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
  44. Stokes, D. (1967). Parties and the nationalization of electoral forces. In W. Chambers & W. Burnham (Eds.), The American party systems: stages of political development (pp. 182–202). New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  45. Turner, F. J. (1914). Geographical influences in American political history. Bulletin of the American Geographical Society, 46(8), 591–595. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Turner, F. J. (1926). Geographic sectionalism in American history. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 16(2), 85–93. Google Scholar
  47. Valentino, N. A., & Sears, D. O. (2005). Old times are not forgotten: race and partisan realignment in the contemporary South. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 672–688. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vertz, L. L., Frendreis, J. P., & Gibson, J. L. (1987). Nationalization of the electorate in the United States. The American Political Science Review, 81(3), 961–966. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luís Aguiar-Conraria
    • 1
  • Pedro C. Magalhães
    • 2
    • 3
  • Maria Joana Soares
    • 4
  1. 1.NIPE and Economics DepartmentUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal
  2. 2.Department of GovernmentGeorgetown UniversityWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.Institute of Social SciencesUniversity of LisbonLisbonPortugal
  4. 4.NIPE and Department of Mathematics and ApplicationsUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations