Advertisement

Trade openness and public expenditure. The Spanish case, 1960–2000

  • 549 Accesses

  • 4 Citations

Abstract

The empirical link between the post-WWII expansion of international market integration and the growth of national public expenditure has been widely noted, with no consensus as yet regarding the interpretation of this correlation. We posit that a likely link between increased openness and public spending is the use of the latter to offset changes in the distribution of income that result from increased openness. To explore this potential link, we study time series data from Spain in 1960–2000, a period of major changes in political organization as well as in both fiscal and trade policy. We find evidence that democracy reinforced the causal relation from increased openness to greater public expenditure. Thus, the paper contributes to the literature that emphasizes that changes in political regimes are potentially important determinants of the observed international patterns of openness and government size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

References

  1. Abizadeh, S. (2005). An analysis of government expenditure and trade liberalization. Applied Economics, 37, 1881–1884.

  2. Adserà, A., & Boix, C. (2002). Trade, democracy, and the size of the public sector: the political underpinnings of openness. International Organization, 56(2), 229–262.

  3. Alesina, A., & Wacziarg, R. (1998). Openness, country size and government. Journal of Public Economics, 69, 305–321.

  4. Alonso, J. A. (1993). El sector exterior. In J. L. García Delgado (Ed.), España, economía (pp. 273–366). Madrid: Espasa Calpe.

  5. Arai, Y., & Kurozumi, E. (2005). Testing for the null hypothesis of cointegration with structural breaks. In CIRJE Discussion Papers F-319. University of Tokyo.

  6. Bai, J., & Perron, P. (1998). Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica, 66, 47–78.

  7. Balle, F., & Vaidya, A. (2002). A regional analysis of openness and government size. Applied Economics Letters, 9, 289–292.

  8. Banco de España (1998). Informe Anual. Madrid.

  9. Barea, J. (1997). Disciplina presupuestaria e integración de España en la Unión Monetaria. Discurso de Ingreso. Madrid: Real Academia de Ciencias Morales y Políticas.

  10. Baunsgaard, T., & Keen, M. (2010). Tax revenue and (or?) trade liberalization. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 563–577.

  11. Benarroch, M., & Pandey, M. (2008). Trade openness and government size. Economics Letters, 101, 157–159.

  12. Boix, C. (1998). Political parties, growth and equality-conservative and social democratic economic strategies in the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  13. Borcherding, T. E., Ferris, J. S., & Garzoni, A. (2004). Growth in the real size of government since 1970. In J. Backhaus & R. E. Wagner (Eds.), Handbook of public finance (pp. 77–108). New York: Kluwer.

  14. Bover, O., Arellano, M., & Bentolila, S. (1996). Duración del desempleo, duración de las prestaciones y ciclo económico. Servicio de Estudios Económicos, No. 57. Madrid: Banco de España.

  15. Buisán, A., & Gordo, E. (1997). El sector exterior en España. Servicio de Estudios Económicos, No. 60. Banco de España.

  16. Cameron, D. (1978). The expansion of the public economy: a comparative analysis. The American Political Science Review, 72, 1243–1261.

  17. Carreras, A., Prados de la Escosura, L., & Rosés, J. J. (2005). Renta y riqueza. In A. Carreras & X. Tafunell (Eds.), Estadísticas históricas de España, siglos XIX–XX. Madrid: Foundation BBVA.

  18. Carreras, A., & Tafunell, X. (2007). Historia económica de la España contemporánea. Barcelona: Crítica.

  19. Comín, F. (1988). Evolución histórica del gasto público. Papeles de Economía Española, 37, 78–99.

  20. Comín, F. (1996). In Historia de la Hacienda pública, II. España (1808–1995). Barcelona: Crítica.

  21. Comín, F. (2002). La hacienda pública entre 1940 y 1959. In Hacienda Pública Española (Monographic, pp. 169–190).

  22. Commander, S., Davoodi, H. R., & Lee, U. J. (1997). The causes of government and the consequences for growth and well-being. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1785.

  23. De la Dehesa, G., Ruiz, J. J., & Torres, A. (1990). The timing and sequencing of a trade liberalization policy: the case of Spain. In M. Michaelly, A. Choksi & D. Papageorgiou (Eds.), Liberalizing foreign trade. Oxford: Basil Blacwell.

  24. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

  25. Dreher, A. (2006). The influence of globalization on taxes and social policy: An empirical analysis for OECD countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 22, 179–201.

  26. Dreher, A., Sturm, J. E., & Ursprung, H. W. (2008). The impact of globalization on the composition of government expenditures: evidence from panel data. Public Choice, 134, 263–292.

  27. Epifani, P., & Gancia, G. (2009). Openness, government size and the terms of trade. Review of Economic Studies, 76, 629–668.

  28. Ferris, J. S. (2003). Do alternative measures of government result in alternative explanations for government size? Economics Bulletin, 8(4), 1–11.

  29. Ferris, J. S., Park, S. B., & Winer, S. L. (2008). Studying the role of political competition in the evolution of government size over long horizons. Public Choice, 137, 369–401.

  30. Fölster, S., & Henrekson, M. (2001). Growth effects of government expenditure and taxation in rich countries. European Economic Review, 45, 1501–1520.

  31. Gadea, M. D. (1993). Un modelo sobre los determinantes del crecimiento del gasto público en España (1964–1991). Revista de Economía Aplicada, 1(2), 31–65.

  32. Garen, J., & Trask, K. (2005). Do more open economies have bigger governments? Another look. Journal of Development Economics, 77, 533–551.

  33. Garrett, G. (2001). Globalization and government spending around the world. Studies in comparative international development, 35(4), 3–29.

  34. Garrett, G., & Mitchell, D. (2001). Globalization, government spending and taxation in the OECD. European Journal of Political Research, 39(2), 145–177.

  35. Gemmell, N., Kneller, R., & Sanz, I. (2008). Foreign investment, international trade and the size and structure of public expenditures. European Journal of Political Economy, 24(1), 151–171.

  36. Gómez, A. L., & Roldán, J. M. (1995). Análisis de la política fiscal en España con una perspectiva macroeconómica (1988–1994). Servicio de Estudios Económicos, No. 53. Madrid: Banco de España.

  37. González-Páramo, J. M. (1993). Política pública y convergencia: la modernización del sector público. Papeles de Economía Española, 57, 171–193.

  38. Granger, C. (1988). Some recent developments in a concept of causality. Journal of Econometrics, 39, 199–211.

  39. Hicks, A., & Swank, D. (1992). Politics, institutions, and welfare spending in industrialized democracies, 1960–1982. American Political Science Review, 86(3), 658–674.

  40. Huber, E., Ragin, C. H., & Stephens, J. (1993). Social democracy, Christian democracy, constitutional structure, and the welfare state. American Journal of Sociology, 99(2), 711–749.

  41. Jeanneney, S. G., & Hua, P. (2004). Why do more open Chinese province have bigger governments? Review of International Economics, 12(3), 525–542.

  42. Johansen, S. (1992). Testing weak exogeneity and the order of cointegration in UK money demand data. Journal of Policy Modelling, 14(3), 313–334.

  43. Johansen, S. (1995). Likelihood-based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  44. Juselius, K. (2006). The cointegrated VAR model. Methodology and applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  45. Kejriwal, M. (2008). Cointegration with structural breaks: an application to the Felstein-Horioka puzzle. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 12(1). Article 3.

  46. Kejriwal, M., & Perron, P. (2008). Testing for multiple structural changes in cointegrated regression models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 28(4), 503–522.

  47. Kittel, B., & Winner, H. (2005). How reliable is pooled analysis in political economy? The globalization-welfare state nexus revisited. European Journal of Political Research, 44, 269–293.

  48. Leamer, E. (1983). Let’s take the con out of econometrics. American Economic Review, 73(1), 31–43.

  49. Leamer, E. (1985). Sensitivity analysis would help. American Economic Review, 75(3), 308–313.

  50. Lee, J., & Strazicich, M. (2003). Minimum LM unit root tests with two structural breaks. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(4), 1082–1089.

  51. Levine, R., & Renelt, D. (1992). A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. American Economic Review, 82(4), 942–963.

  52. Liu, J., Wu, S., & Zidek, J. V. (1997). On segmented multivariate regressions. Statistica Sinica, 7, 497–525.

  53. MacKinnon, J. G., Haug, A. A., & Michelis, L. (1999). Numerical distribution functions of likelihood ratio tests for cointegration. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 14, 563–577.

  54. Martínez-Mongay, C. (2002). Fiscal policy and the size of governments. In M. Bute, J. Von Hagen, & C. Martínez-Mongay (Eds.), The behaviour of fiscal authorities: stabilisation, growth and institutions. Basingstoke: Pal Grave Macmillan.

  55. Molana, H., Montagna, C., & Violato, M. (2004). On the causal relationship between trade openness and government size: evidence from 23 OECD countries. Research Paper Series: Internationalisation of Economic Policy, No. 1. University of Nottingham.

  56. Mourao, P. (2007). Has trade openness increased all Portuguese public expenditures? A detailed time-series study. Financial Theory and Practice, 31(3), 225–247.

  57. Nooruddin, I., & Simmons, J. W. (2009). Openness, uncertainty, and social spending: implications for the globalization-welfare state debate. International Studies Quarterly, 53, 841–866.

  58. Oatley, T. (1999). How constraining is capital mobility? The partisan hypothesis in an open economy. American Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 1003–1027.

  59. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  60. Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  61. Perron, P. (1989). The great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica, 57(6), 1361–1401.

  62. Potrafke, N. (2009). Did globalization restrict partisan politics? An empirical evaluation of social expenditures in a panel of OECD countries. Public Choice, 140, 105–124.

  63. Ram, R. (2009). Openness, country size and government size: additional evidence from a large cross-country panel. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1–2), 213–218.

  64. Rodrik, D. (1996). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 5537.

  65. Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 997–1032.

  66. Rojo, L. A. (2005). La economía española en la democracia (1976–2000). In F. Comín et al. (Ed.), Historia económica de España, siglos X–XX (pp. 331–367). Barcelona: Crítica.

  67. Rudra, N., & Haggard, S. (2005). Globalization, democracy and effective welfare spending in the developing World. Comparative Political Studies, 38(9), 1015–1049.

  68. Sáenz, E. (2010). The Spanish external sector. A policy of trade openness. Economic Affairs, 30(1), 77–82.

  69. Sala-i-Martin, X. (1997). I just run four million regressions. The American Economic Review, 87(2), 178–183. Papers and proceedings of the hundred and fourth annual meeting of the American economic association.

  70. Schmidt, M. G. (1983). The growth of the tax state. The industrial democracies, 1950–1978. In C. H. Taylor (Ed.), Why governments grow: measuring public sector size (pp. 261–285). London: Sage.

  71. Segura, J. (1999). Sector público: análisis económico y perspectiva general. In J. L. García Delgado (Ed.), España, economía: ante el siglo XX (pp. 306–326). Madrid: Espasa Calpe.

  72. Serrano, J. M. (1999). La política de apertura exterior. In J. L. García Delgado (Ed.), España, economía: ante el siglo XXI (pp. 613–630). Madrid: Espasa Calpe.

  73. Serrano, J. M., & Pardos, E. (2005). Los años de crecimiento del franquismo (1959–1975). In F. Comín et al. (Eds.), Historia económica de España, siglos X–XX (pp. 331–367). Barcelona: Crítica.

  74. Shelton, C. A. (2007). The size and composition of government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics, 91(11–12), 2230–2260.

  75. Tena (2005). Sector Exterior. In A. Carreras & X. Tafunell (Eds.), Estadísticas históricas de España, siglos XIX–XX. Madrid: Foundation BBVA.

  76. Uriel, E., Moltó, M. L., & Cucarella, V. (2000). Contabilidad Nacional de España. Series enlazadas (CNEe-86) (pp. 1954–1997). Madrid: Foundation BBVA.

  77. Viñuela, J. (1979). La política comercial de una apertura limitada y contradictoria, 1960–1975. In A. Viñas et al. (Eds.), Política comercial exterior de España (pp. 1169–1288). Madrid: Banco Exterior de España, Servicio de Estudios Económicos.

  78. Zivot, E., & Andrews, D. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economics Statistics, 10(3), 251–270.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Estela Sáenz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sáenz, E., Sabaté, M. & Gadea, M.D. Trade openness and public expenditure. The Spanish case, 1960–2000. Public Choice 154, 173–195 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9841-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Trade openness
  • Public expenditure
  • Democracy
  • Cointegration
  • Structural breaks

JEL Classification

  • F41
  • H11