Skip to main content
Log in

Do elections affect the composition of fiscal policy in developed, established democracies?

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of elections on the level and composition of fiscal instruments using a sample of 19 high-income OECD democracies during the period 1972–1999. We find that elections shift public spending towards current expenditures at the cost of public investment. Although we find no evidence for an electoral cycle for government deficit and overall expenditures, we find a negative effect of elections on revenue attributed to a fall in direct taxation. Our results apply for predetermined electoral periods while endogenous elections seem to increase deficit and leave the composition of fiscal policy unaffected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhmedov, A., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2004). Opportunistic political cycles: test in a young democracy setting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(4), 1301–1338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Cohen, G. D., & Roubini, N. (1993). Electoral business cycle in industrial democracies. European Journal of Political Economy, 9(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Roubini, N. (1992). Political cycles in OECD economies. Review of Economic Studies, 59(4), 663–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Roubini, N., & Cohen, G. D. (1997). Political cycles and the macroeconomy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Tabellini, G. (1990). A positive theory of fiscal deficits and government debt. Review of Economic Studies, 57(3), 403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alt, J. E., & Chrystal, K. A. (1983). Political economics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alt, J. E., & Lassen, D. (2006). Fiscal transparency, political parties, and debt in OECD countries. European Economic Review, 50(6), 1403–1439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelopoulos, K., & Economides, G. (2008). Fiscal policy, rent seeking and growth under electoral uncertainty theory and evidence from the OECD. Canadian Journal of Economics, 41(4), 1375–1405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelopoulos, K., Economides, G., & Kammas, P. (2007). Tax-spending policies and economic growth: theoretical predictions and evidence from the OECD. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(4), 885–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, K., Gerber, M., Leimgruber, P., & Beyeler, M. (2008). The comparative political data set 1960–2006. Berne: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, J., & Heyndels, B. (2002). Tax structure turbulence in OECD countries. Public Choice, 111(3–4), 347–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belke, A., Baumgärtner, F., Schneider, F., & Setzer, R. (2007). The different extent of privatization proceeds in OECD countries: a preliminary explanation using a public-choice approach. FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, 63(2), 211–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., & Case, A. (1995). Does electoral accountability affect economic policy choices? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 769–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A., & Nadeau, R. (1992). The electoral budget cycle. Public Choice, 74(3), 389–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, S. (2002). Elections, electoral competitiveness, and political budget cycles in developing countries. Harvard University CID Working Paper No. 78.

  • Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bräuninger, T. (2005). A partisan model of government expenditures. Public Choice, 125(3), 409–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung, J., & Pesaran, M. H. (2008). Unit roots and cointegration in panels. In L. Matyas & P. Sevestre (Eds.), The econometrics of panel data (pp. 279–322). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brender, A., & Drazen, A. (2005). Political budget cycles in new versus established democracies. Journal of Monetary Economics, 52(7), 1271–1295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brender, A., & Drazen, A. (2008). How do budget deficits and economic growth affect reelection prospects? Evidence from a large panel of countries. American Economic Review, 98(5), 2203–2220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brender, A., & Drazen, A. (2009). Do leaders affect government spending priorities? NBER Working Papers No. 15368.

  • Cukierman, A., & Meltzer, A. H. (1986). A positive theory of discretionary policy, the cost of democratic government, and the benefits of a constitution. Economic Inquiry, 24(3), 367–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cusack, T. (1997). Partisan politics and public finance: changes in public spending in the industrialized democracies, 1955–1989. Public Choice, 91(3–4), 375–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drazen, A. (2000). The political business cycle after 25 years. NBER Macroeconomic Annual, 15, 75–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drazen, A., & Eslava, M. (2010). Electoral manipulation via voter-friendly spending: theory and evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 92(1), 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzese, R. J. (2000). Electoral and partisan manipulation of public debt in developed democracies, 1956–1990. In R. Strauch & Jürgen von Hagen (Eds.), Institutions, politics and fiscal policy (pp. 61–83). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Franzese, R. J. (2002). Electoral and partisan cycles in economic policies and outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science, 5, 369–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gemmell, N., Kneller, R., & Sanz, I. (2007). Tax composition and economic growth in OECD countries. Mimeo.

  • Gonzalez, M. (2002). Do changes in democracy affect the political budget cycle? Evidence from Mexico. Review of Development Economics, 6(2), 204–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadi, A. S. (1992). Identifying multiple outliers in multivariate data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 54(3), 761–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallerberg, M., & Basinger, S. (1998). Internationalization and changes in tax policy in OECD countries: the importance of domestic veto players. Comparative Political Studies, 31(3), 321–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckelman, J. C., & Berument, H. (1998). Political business cycles and endogenous elections. Southern Economic Journal, 64(4), 987–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D. A. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review, 71(4), 467–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Im, S., Pesaran, H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kittel, B., & Winner, H. (2005). How reliable is pooled analysis in political economy? The globalization-welfare state nexus revisited. European Journal of Political Research, 44(2), 269–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiviet, J. F. (1995). On bias, inconsistency, and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneebone, R., & McKenzie, K. (2001). Electoral and partisan cycles in fiscal policy: an examination of Canadian provinces. International Tax and Public Finance, 8(5), 753–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneller, R., Bleaney, M., & Gemmell, N. (1999). Fiscal policy and growth: evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Public Economics, 74(2), 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, S. D. (1997). Using electoral cycles in police hiring to estimate the effect of police on crime. American Economic Review, 87(3), 270–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindbeck, A. (1976). Stabilization policy in open economies with endogenous politicians. American Economic Review, 66(2), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(0), 631–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malley, J., Philippopoulos, A., & Woitek, U. (2007). Electoral uncertainty, fiscal policy and macroeconomic fluctuations. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31(3), 1051–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, B. T. (1978). The political business cycle: an empirical test. Southern Economic Journal, 44(3), 504–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milesi-Ferretti, G. M., Perotti, R., & Massimo, R. (2002). Electoral systems and public spending. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(2), 609–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mink, M., & de Haan, J. (2006). Are there political budget cycles in the euro area? European Union Politics, 7(2), 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. C. (2003). Public choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, S. J. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1417–1426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. (1975). The political business cycle. Review of Economic Studies, 42(2), 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paldam, M. (1989). Politics matters after all: testing Hibbs’ theory of partisan cycles. Aarhus University, Mimeo.

  • Peltzman, S. (1992). Voters as fiscal conservatives. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 327–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (1990). Macroeconomic policy, credibility and politics. London: Harwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2002). Political economics: explaining economic policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2003). The economic effect of constitutions. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potrafke, N. (2006). Political effects on the allocation of public expenditures: empirical evidence from OECD countries. DIW Discussion Papers No. 653.

  • Potrafke, N. (2011, forthcoming). Public expenditures on education and cultural affairs in the German states: does government ideology affect the budget composition? German Economic Review.

  • Reid, B. G. (1998). Endogenous elections, electoral budget cycles and Canadian provincial governments. Public Choice, 97(1–2), 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 997–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, K. (1990). Equilibrium political budget cycles. American Economic Review, 80(1), 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, K., & Sibert, A. (1988). Elections and macroeconomic policy cycles. Review of Economic Studies, 55(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D. (2009a). How to do xtabond2: an introduction to ‘difference’ and ‘system’ GMM in Stata. Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D. (2009b). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. (1992). Rationality and the political business cycle: the case of local government. Public choice, 73(1), 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saporiti, A., & Streb, J. (2008). Separation of powers and political budget cycles. Public Choice, 137(1), 329–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, C. J. (2010). Fighting with one hand tied behind the back: political budget cycles in the West German states. Public choice, 142(1), 125–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuknecht, L. (1996). Political business cycles and fiscal policies in developing countries. Kyklos, 49(2), 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuknecht, L. (2000). Fiscal policy cycles and public expenditure in developing countries. Public Choice, 102(1–2), 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, M., & Svensson, J. (2006). Political budget cycles: do they differ across countries and why? Journal of Public Economics, 90(8–9), 1367–1389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. (1978). Political control of the economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veiga, L., & Veiga, F. (2007). Political business cycles at the municipal level. Public Choice, 131(1), 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergne, C. (2009). Democracy, elections and allocation of public expenditures in developing countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 25(1), 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margarita Katsimi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katsimi, M., Sarantides, V. Do elections affect the composition of fiscal policy in developed, established democracies?. Public Choice 151, 325–362 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9749-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9749-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation