Public Choice

, Volume 150, Issue 3, pp 561–578

Why is there no revolution in North Korea?

The political economy of revolution revisited

DOI: 10.1007/s11127-010-9716-4

Cite this article as:
Apolte, T. Public Choice (2012) 150: 561. doi:10.1007/s11127-010-9716-4


The paper critically assesses the Acemoglu–Robinson approach to revolutions, as it is focused on inequality of wealth or income rather than on collective-action problems. We show that income inequality is not a sufficient and not even a necessary condition for a revolution to occur. Rather, a necessary condition for a revolution is that any subpopulation can expect net benefits from it, for which inequality is not a precondition. As a result, a certain structure of commitment devices or their absence rather than inequality is crucial for explaining why revolutions sometimes occur and sometimes not.


Credible commitments Dictatorship Political economy Redistribution 

JEL Classification

D72 D74 O15 P16 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CIW Center for Interdisciplinary EconomicsUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations