Skip to main content

Oil and the duration of dictatorships

Public Choice volume 148, pages 505–530 (2011)Cite this article

Abstract

Theoretical models do not reach an unambiguous conclusion concerning the effects of natural resource endowment on the duration of dictatorial regimes. We assess empirically, for the first time, the relationship between oil endowment and the duration of autocratic leaders. Using a dataset comprising information for 106 dictators, our empirical analysis indicates that dictators in countries which are relatively better endowed in terms of oil tend to stay longer in office. The result is robust to changes in the definition of dictatorial regimes and in the specifications used in the econometric analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. A., & Verdier, T. (2004). Alfred Marshall lecture: kleptocracy and divide-and-rule: a model of personal rule. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2, 162–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., Ticchi, D., & Vindigni, A. (2010). A theory of military dictatorship. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2, 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ai, C., & Norton, E. C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80, 123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J., Limongi, F., & Przeworski, A. (1996). Classifying political regimes. Studies in Comparative International Development, 3, 3–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 155–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98, 371–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellin, E. (2004). The robustness of authoritarianism in the Middle East: exceptionalism in comparative perspective. Comparative Politics, 36, 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya, S., & Hodler, R. (2010). Natural resources, democracy and corruption. European Economic Review, 54, 608–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bienen, H., & van der Walle, N. (1992). A proportional hazard model of leadership duration. Journal of Politics, 54, 685–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caselli, F. (2006). Power struggles and the natural resource curse. Mimeo, Department of Economics, London School of Economics.

  • Cheibub, J. A., Gandhi, J., & Vreeland, J. R. (2010). Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, 143, 67–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleves, M. A., Gould, W. M., & Gutierrez, R. G. (2004). An introduction to survival analysis using Stata (revised edn.). College Station: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2004). Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers, 56, 563–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespo-Cuaresma, J., Lutz, W., & Sanderson, W. (2008). The demography of educational attainment and economic growth. Science, 319, 1047–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton, S. T., & Walker, M. A. (1997). Income, growth, and economic freedom. American Economic Review, 87, 328–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House (2008). Freedom in the world (Annual report). http://www.freedomhouse.org.

  • Gallego, M., & Pitchik, C. (2004). An economic theory of leadership turnover. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2361–2382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibney, M., Cornett, L., & Wood, R. (2009). Political terror scale 1976–2007. http://www.politicalterrorscale.org.

  • Goemans, H., Gleditisch, K. S., & Chiozza, G. (2007). Archigos. A data set on leaders 1875–2004. Version 2.8.

  • Grossman, H. I. (1991). A general equilibrium model of insurrections. American Economic Review, 81, 912–921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., Davoodi, H., & Alonso-Terme, R. (2002). Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty. Economics of Governance, 3, 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heritage Foundation (2009). 2009 index of economic freedom. http://www.heritage.org.

  • Heston, A., Summers, R., & Aten, B. (2006). Penn world table version. Version 6.2.

  • Hodler, R. (2006). The curse of natural resources in fractionalized countries. European Economic Review, 50, 1367–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, M. M., & Winer, S. L. (2004). Tinpots, totalitarians (and democrats): an empirical investigation of economic growth on civil liberties and political rights. Public Choice, 118, 289–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalbfleisch, J. D., & Prentice, R. L. (2002). The statistical analysis of failure time data (2nd edn.). New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2005). Governance matters IV: governance indicators for 1996–2004. Policy Research Working Paper 3630, The World Bank, Washington, DC. http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance.

  • Kurrild-Klitgaard, P. (2000). The constitutional economics of autocratic succession. Public Choice, 103, 63–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leite, C., & Weidmann, J. (2002). Does mother nature corrupt? Natural resources, corruption, and economic growth. In G. Abed & S. Gupta (Eds.), Governance, corruption, and economic performance (pp. 159–196). Washington: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political man: the social bases of politics. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, W., Goujon, A., Samir, K. C., & Sanderson, W. (2007). Reconstruction of population by age, sex and level of educational attainment. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 2007, 193–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M. G., & Jaggers, K. (2005). Polity IV project. Political regime characteristics and transition, 1800–2004. Version 2004.

  • Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 681–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, M. C., & Olson, M. C. (1996). The economics of autocracy and majority rule: the invisible hand and the use of force. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 72–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, K. M. (2007). Natural resources, aid, and democratization: a best-case scenario. Public Choice, 131, 365–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. C. (1965). The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. C. (1991). Autocracy, democracy and prosperity. In R. Zeckhauser (Ed.), Strategy and Choice (pp. 131–157). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. C. (1993). Dictatorship, democracy, and development. American Political Science Review, 87, 567–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. C. (2000). Power and prosperity. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, E. A. G. (1960). Economic consequences of the size of nations. London: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. A., Torvik, R., & Verdier, T. (2006). Political foundations of the resource curse. Journal of Development Economics, 79, 447–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. L. (2001). Does oil hinder democracy? World Politics, 53, 325–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i-Martin, X., & Subramanian, A. (2003). Addressing the natural resource curse: an illustration from Nigeria. NBER Working Paper Series 9804, National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Smith, B. (2004). Oil wealth and regime survival in the developing world, 1960–1999. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 232–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornell, A., & Lane, P. R. (1999). The voracity effect. American Economic Review, 89, 22–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, K. K. (2005). More oil, less democracy? Theory and evidence from crude oil discoveries. Department of Economics, University of Chicago.

  • Tullock, G. (1987). Autocracy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (2005). The social dilemma of: autocracy, revolution and coup d’état. Liberty Fund.

  • van der Ploeg, F. (2007). Africa and natural resources: managing natural resources for sustainable growth, Background paper. African Development Bank.

  • Wintrobe, R. (1990). The tinpot and the totalitarian: an economic theory of dictatorship. American Political Science Review, 84, 849–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austrian Institute of Economic Research and International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Augasse 2-6, 1090, Vienna, Austria

    Jesus Crespo Cuaresma

  2. Department of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Salzburg, Kapitelgasse 5-7, 5010, Salzburg, Austria

    Harald Oberhofer

  3. Department of Economics, Monash University, 900 Dandenong Road, 3145, Caulfield East, VIC, Australia

    Paul A. Raschky

Authors
  1. Jesus Crespo Cuaresma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Harald Oberhofer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul A. Raschky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harald Oberhofer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crespo Cuaresma, J., Oberhofer, H. & Raschky, P.A. Oil and the duration of dictatorships. Public Choice 148, 505–530 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9671-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9671-0

Keywords

  • Natural resources
  • Dictatorship
  • Political economy
  • Duration

JEL Classification

  • Q34
  • D72
  • H11