Skip to main content
Log in

Who will deregulate the deregulators?

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A well-intentioned and fully informed regulator may determine that the optimal policy is to deregulate the market, yet the regulator may be constrained from doing so. In this condition, deregulatory policies originate in exogenous shocks to the regulator’s choice environment. Entrepreneurship in political and economic markets is a primary source of institutional change that promotes deregulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnum, J. W. What prompted airline deregulation 20 years ago? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Bar Association, Vancouver, BC, September, 1998. Retrieved January 8, 2008, from http://library.findlaw.com/1988/Sep/1/129304.html.

  • Benson, B. L. (2002). Regulatory disequilibrium and inefficiency: the case of interstate trucking. The Review of Austrian Economics, 15(2/3), 229–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton, D. B., & McGonegal, S. (2007). The digital economy fact book, 9th edn. Washington: The Progress and Freedom Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M.(1999). Rights, efficiency, and exchange: The irrelevance of transaction costs. In G. Brennan, H. Kliemt, & R. D. Tollison (Eds.), The logical foundations of constitutional liberty: the collected works of James M. Buchanan, 1 (pp. 260–277). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, S. (1996). Roofs or stars: The stated intents and actual effects of a rents ordinance. In L. J. Alston, T. Eggertsson, & D. C. North (Eds.), Empirical studies in institutional change (pp. 224–243). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougan, W. R., & Snyder, J. M. (1993). Are rents fully dissipated? Public Choice, 77(4), 793–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, R. K., López, E. J., & Seldon, B. J. (2006). Incorporating policymaker costs and political competition into rent seeking games. Southern Economic Journal, 73(1), 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, R. K., López, E. J., & Seldon, B. J. (2008, in press). Allocating lobbying resources between collective and private rents. Political Research Quarterly.

  • Goff, B. L., McCormick, R. E., & Tollison, R. D. (2002). Racial integration as an innovation: empirical evidence from sports leagues. American Economic Review, 92(1), 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuger, A. O. (1996). The political economy of controls: American sugar. In L. J. Alston, T. Eggertsson, & D. C. North (Eds.), Empirical studies in institutional change (pp. 169–218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Means, T., Stringham, E. P., & López, E. J. (2007, November 9). Below-market housing mandates as takings: Measuring their impact. Policy Reports. The Independent Institute. Retrieved January 8, 2008, http://www.independent.org/publications/policy_reports/

  • McCormick, R. E., Shughart, W. F., II, & Tollison, R. D. (1984). The disinterest in deregulation. American Economic Review, 1075–1079.

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of economic regulation. Journal of Law and Economics, 19(2), 211–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poitras, M., & Sutter, D. (2000). Enhancing efficiency or crying over spilled milk: the benefits of reform. Public Choice, 105, 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shughart, W. F. II (1990). The organization of industry. Homewood: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidak, J. G., Singer, H. J., & Teece, D. (1999). A general framework for competitive analysis in wireless telecommunications. Hastings Law Journal, 50(6), 1639–1672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollison, R. D. (1997). Rent seeking. In D. C. Mueller (Ed.), Perspectives on public choice: a handbook (pp. 506–527). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1975). The transitional gains trap. Bell Journal of Economics, 6(2), 671–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald, M. L. (2007). M. Lamar Muse, 86, dies: led Southwest Airlines. The New York Times, February 7, p. A16.

  • Wenders, J. T. (1987). On perfect rent dissipation. American Economic Review, 77, 456–459.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward J. López.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

López, E.J. Who will deregulate the deregulators?. Public Choice 142, 379–384 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9537-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9537-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation