In this article, we focus on the consequences of quorum requirements for turnout in referendums. We use a rational choice, decision theoretic voting model to demonstrate that participation quorums change the incentives some electors face, inducing those who oppose changes in the status quo and expect to be in the minority to abstain. As a result, paradoxically, participation quorums decrease electoral participation. We test our model’s predictions using data for all referendums held in current European Union countries from 1970 until 2007, and show that the existence of a participation quorums increases abstention by more than ten percentage points.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricist’s companion. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
Barro, R., & Lee, J.-W. (2001). International data on educational attainment: updates and implications. Oxford Economic Papers, 3, 541–563.
Bendor, J., Diermeier, D., & Ting, M. M. (2003). A behavioral model of turnout. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 261–280.
Blais, A. (2000). To vote or not to vote: the merits and limits of rational choice theory. Pittsburgh: The University of Pittsburgh Press.
Blais, A. (2006). What affects voter turnout? Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 111–125.
Blais, A., & Dobrzynska, A. (1998). Turnout in electoral democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 33(2), 239–262.
Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Karp, J. A. (2007). Enraged or engaged? Preferences for direct citizen participation in affluent democracies. Political Research Quarterly, 60(3), 351–362.
C2D: Research Centre on Direct Democracy. (2007). C2D Direct Democracy Database. Available at: http://www.c2d.ch.
Chamberlain, G., & Rothschild, M. (1981). A note on the probability of casting a decisive vote. Journal of Economic Theory, 25(1), 152–162.
Coate, S., & Conlin, M. (2004). A group rule-utilitarian approach of voter turnout: theory and evidence. American Economic Review, 94(5), 1476–1504.
Coate, S., Conlin, M., & Moro, A. (2008). The performance of pivotal-voter models in small-scale elections: evidence from Texas liquor referenda. Journal of Public Economics, 92(3–4), 582–596.
Côrte-Real, P., & Pereira, P. T. (2004). The voter who wasn’t there: referenda, representation and abstention. Social Choice and Welfare, 22(2), 349–369.
Cox, G. W., & Munger, M. C. (1989). Closeness, expenditures, and turnout in the 1982 US House elections. American Political Science Review, 83(1), 217–231.
Dhillon, A., & Peralta, S. (2002). Economic theories of voter turnout. The Economic Journal, 112(480), 332–352.
Feddersen, T. (2004). Rational choice theory and the paradox of not voting. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(1), 99–112.
Feddersen, T. J., & Pesendorfer, W. (1996). The swing voter curse. American Economic Review, 86(3), 408–424.
Feddersen, T. J., & Pesendorfer, W. (1999). Abstention in elections with asymmetric information and diverse preferences. American Political Science Review, 93(2), 381–398.
Flickinger, R. S., & Studlar, D. T. (1992). The disappearing voters? Exploring declining turnout in western European elections. West European Politics, 15(2), 1–16.
Fornos, C.A., Power, T. J., & Garand, J. C. (2004). Explaining voter turnout in Latin America, 1980 to 2000. Comparative Political Studies, 37(8), 909–940.
Franklin, M. N. (2002). The dynamics of electoral participation. In L. LeDuc et al. (Eds.), Comparing democracies 2: new challenges in the study of elections and voting. London: Sage.
Franklin, M. N. (2004). Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Freedom House (2007). Freedom in the world: comparative scores for all countries from 1973 to 2006. Available at http://www.freedomhouse.org/uploads/fiw/FIWAllScores.xls.
Gentzkow, M. (2006). Television and voter turnout. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(3), 931–972.
Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Shachar, R. (2003). Voting may be habit-forming: evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 47(3), 540–550.
Geys, B. (2006). Explaining voter turnout: a review of aggregate-level research. Electoral Studies, 25(4), 637–663.
Greene, W. (2008). Econometric analysis (6th Ed.) Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Herrera, H., & Mattozzi, A. (2009, forthcoming). Quorum and turnout in referenda. Journal of the European Economic Association.
International IDEA: Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. (2007). Voter turnout website. Available at http://www.idea.int/vt/.
Jackman, R. W. (1987). Political institutions and voter turnout in the industrial democracies. American Political Science Review, 81(2), 405–423.
Kaufmann, B., Büchi, R., & Braun, N. (2008). Guidebook to direct democracy in Switzerland and beyond. Marburg: Initiative & Referendum Institute Europe.
Kostadinova, T. (2003). Voter turnout dynamics in post-Communist Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 42(6), 741–759.
LeDuc, L. (2003). The politics of direct democracy: referendums in global perspective. Toronto: Broadview Press.
Levine, D. K., & Palfrey, T. R. (2007). The paradox of voter participation? A laboratory study. American Political Science Review, 101(1), 143–158.
Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Skalaban, A. (1989). Citizen forecasting: can voters see into the future? British Journal of Political Science, 19(1), 146–153.
Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Tien, C. (1999). Voters as forecasters: a micromodel of election prediction. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(2), 175–184.
Lupia, A., & Matsusaka, J. G. (2004). Direct democracy: new approaches to old questions. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 463–482.
Marshall, M. G., Jaggers, K., & Gurr, T. R. (2006). Polity IV project: political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2004. Maryland: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland.
Matsusaka, J. G. (1993). Election closeness and voter turnout: evidence from California ballot propositions. Public Choice, 76(4), 313–334.
Noam, E. (1980). The efficiency of direct democracy. The Journal of Political Economy, 88(4), 803–810.
Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: reinventing political activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Qvortrup, M. (2005). A comparative study of referendums. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Radcliff, B. (1992). The welfare state, turnout, and the economy: a comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 86(2), 444–456.
Rallings, C., Thrasher, M., & Borisyuk, G. (2003). Seasonal factors, voter fatigue and the costs of voting. Electoral Studies, 22(1), 65–79.
Reif, K., & Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine national second-order elections: a systematic framework for the analysis of European elections results. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1), 3–44.
Setälä, M. (1999). Referendums in western Europe—a wave of direct democracy? Scandinavian Political Studies, 22(4), 327–340.
Shachar, R., & Nalebuff, B. (1999). Follow the leader: theory and evidence on political participation. The American Economic Review, 89(3), 525–547.
Suksi, M. (1993). Bringing in the people: a comparison of the constitutional forms and practices of the referendum. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
Uleri, P. V. (2002). On referendum voting in Italy: Yes, No or non-vote? How Italian parties learned to control referendums. European Journal of Political Research, 41(6), 863–883.
Venice Commission (2005). Tables summarizing the replies to the questionnaire on referendums by the VC adopted by the Council for Democratic Election and the Venice Commission. Document CDL-AD(2005)034add. Available at http://www.venice.coe.int/docs/2005/CDL-AD(2005)034add-e.pdf.
Venice Commission (2007). Code of good practice on referendums. Document CDL-AD(2007)008. Available at http://www.venice.coe.int/docs/2007/CDL-AD(2007)008-e.asp.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Verhulst, J., & Nijeboer, A. (2008). Direct democracy: facts and arguments about the introduction of initiative and referendum. Brussels: Democracy International.
Voitchovsky, S. (2005). Does the profile of income inequality matter for economic growth? Distinguishing between the effects of inequality in different parts of the income distribution. Journal of Economic Growth, 10(3), 273–296.
Washington, E. (2006). How black candidates affect voter turnout. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(3), 973–998.
About this article
Cite this article
Aguiar-Conraria, L., Magalhães, P.C. Referendum design, quorum rules and turnout. Public Choice 144, 63–81 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9504-1
- Referendum design
- Voter turnout