Political and institutional environment and privatization prices
We study the link between the political and institutional context and privatization sales prices. The latter serves as a measure for assessing the extent to which privatization goals have been met. Whereas this link has been studied theoretically, there are very few, if any, empirical papers on this relationship. We use data from 308 privatizations around the world and apply a cross-country approach, including instrumental variables. We find that while the overall political regime does not matter much for prices, the political processes beyond the basic regime do matter. Institutional context also produces a significant impact on prices. Both results are robust to changes in specification.
KeywordsPrivatization Institutions Governance Prices Politics
JEL ClassificationG32 H10 J45
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bolton, P., & Roland, G. (1992). Economics of mass privatization. In 15th Panel meeting of economic policy, Lisbon, Portugal, 1992. Google Scholar
- Chong, A., & López-de-Silanes, F. (2004). Privatization and labor force restructuring around the world. Working Paper, Yale University and Inter-American Development Bank. Google Scholar
- Deininger, K., & Squire, L. (1996). A new data set measuring income inequality. World Bank Economic Review, 10, 565–591. Google Scholar
- Freedom House 2005. http://www.freedomhouse.org.
- Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2003). Governance matters iii: governance indicators for 1996–2002. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3106. Washington, DC, United States: World Bank. Google Scholar
- Perotti, E. (1995). Credible privatization. American Economic Review, 85(4), 847–859. Google Scholar
- Sala-I-Martin, X. (1997). I just ran two million regressions. American Economic Review, 87(2), 178–183 (Papers and Proceedings). Google Scholar
- World Bank 2001. World Development Indicators. CD ROM, Washington, DC. Google Scholar