Public Choice

, 142:69 | Cite as

Determinants of the probability and timing of commercial casino legalization in the United States

  • Peter T. Calcagno
  • Douglas M. Walker
  • John D. Jackson
Article

Abstract

The adoption of lotteries by state governments has received significant attention in the economics literature, but the issue of casino adoption has been neglected by researchers. Casino gambling is a relatively new industry in the United States, outside Nevada and New Jersey. As of 2007, 11 states had established commercial casinos; several more states are considering legalization. We analyze the factors that determine a state’s decision to legalize commercial casinos, using data from 1985 to 2000, a period which covers the majority of states that have adopted commercial casinos. We use a tobit model to examine states’ fiscal conditions, political alignments, intrastate and interstate competitive environments, and demographic characteristics, which yields information on the probability and timing of adoptions. The results suggest a public choice explanation that casino legalization is due to state fiscal stress, to efforts to keep gambling revenues (and the concomitant gambling taxes) within the state, and to attract tourism or “export taxes.”

Keywords

Casinos Casino adoption Legalized gambling Fiscal stress Tax revenues 

JEL Classification

D72 L83 H7 

References

  1. Alm, J., McKee, M., & Skidmore, M. (1993). Fiscal pressure, tax competition, and the introduction of state lotteries. National Tax Journal, 46, 463–476. Google Scholar
  2. American Gaming Association (2008). State of the states: the AGA survey of casino entertainment. Available online at http://www.americangaming.org. Accessed June 1, 2008.
  3. Barrow, C. (2007). New England casino gaming update, 2007. Dartmouth: Center for Policy Analysis, University of Massachusetts. Google Scholar
  4. Berry, F., & Berry, W. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: an event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 395–415. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bluestein, G. (2009). States bet on gambling. Charleston Post and Courier (26 Jan.). Google Scholar
  6. Borg, M., Mason, P., & Shapiro, S. (1991). The economic consequences of state lotteries. New York: Praeger. Google Scholar
  7. Caudill, S., Ford, J., Mixon, F., & Peng, T. (1995). A discrete-time hazard model of lottery adoption. Applied Economics, 21, 555–561. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clotfelter, C., & Cook, P. (1991). Selling hope: state lotteries in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  9. Coughlin, C., Garrett, T., & Hernández-Murillo, R. (2006). The geography, economics, and politics of lottery adoption. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review (May/June), 165–180. Google Scholar
  10. Davis, R., Filer, J., & Moak, D. (1992). The lottery as an alternative source of state revenue. Atlantic Economic Journal, 20(2), 1–10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elliott, D., & Navin, J. (2002). Has riverboat gambling reduced state lottery revenue? Public Finance Review, 30(3), 235–247. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Erekson, O., Platt, G., Whistler, C., & Ziegert, A. (1999). Factors influencing the adoption of state lotteries. Applied Economics, 31, 875–884. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Filer, J., Moak, D., & Uze, B. (1988). Why some states adopt lotteries and others don’t. Public Finance Quarterly, 16(3), 259–283. Google Scholar
  14. Furlong, E. (1998). A logistic regression model explaining recent state casino gaming adoptions. Policy Studies Journal, 26(3), 371–383. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garrett, T. (2001). The Leviathan lottery? Testing the revenue maximization objective of state lotteries as evidence for Leviathan. Public Choice, 109, 101–117. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giacopassi, D., Nichols, M., & Stitt, B. (2006). Voting for a lottery. Public Finance Review, 34, 80–100. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Glickman, M., & Painter, G. (2004). Do tax and expenditure limits lead to state lotteries? Evidence from the United States: 1970–1992. Public Finance Review, 32, 36–64. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gujarati, D. (2003). Basic econometrics (4 edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
  19. Hansen, A. (1995). The tax incidence of the Colorado state lottery instant game. Public Finance Quarterly, 23, 385–398. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jackson, J., Saurman, D., & Shughart, W. (1994). Instant winners: legal change in transition and the diffusion of state lotteries. Public Choice, 80, 245–263. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Javers, E. (2008). MGM Mirage’s hidden card. Business Week (28 Feb.). Available online at http://www.businessweek.com.
  22. Kennedy, P. (2003). A guide to econometrics (5 edn.). Cambridge: The MIT Press. Google Scholar
  23. Light, S., & Rand, K. (2005). Indian gaming & tribal sovereignty: the casino compromise. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. Google Scholar
  24. Mixon, F., Caudill, S., Ford, J., & Peng, T. (1997). The rise (or fall) of lottery adoption within the logic of collective action: some empirical evidence. Journal of Economics and Finance, 21, 43–49. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miyazaki, A., Hansen, A., & Sprott, D. (1998). A longitudinal analysis of income-based tax regressivity of state-sponsored lotteries. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17, 161–172. Google Scholar
  26. National Indian Gaming Commission (2008). NIGC announces 2007 Indian gaming revenues. Press release. Washington, DC. Available online at http://www.nigc.gov/ReadingRoom/PressReleases/.
  27. Pindyck, R., & Rubinfeld, D. (1991). Econometric models and econometric forecasts (3 edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
  28. Richburg, K. (2008). Governors seek remedies for shortfalls. Washington Post (13 Jan.). Google Scholar
  29. Rubensetin, R., & Scafidi, B. (2002). Who pays and who benefits? Examining the distributional consequences of the Georgia Lottery for Education. National Tax Journal, 55(2), 223–238. Google Scholar
  30. Sirakaya, E., Dursun, D., & Hwan-Suk, C. (2005). Forecasting gaming referenda. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(1), 127–149. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stranahan, H., & Borg, M. (1998). Separating the decisions of lottery expenditures and participation: a truncated tobit approach. Public Finance Review, 26(2), 99–117. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. von Herrmann, D. (2002). The big gamble: the politics of lottery and casino expansion. Westport: Praeger. Google Scholar
  33. Walker, D. (2007). The economics of casino gambling. New York: Springer. Google Scholar
  34. Walker, D., & Jackson, J. (2008). Do U.S. gambling industries cannibalize each other? Public Finance Review, 36(3), 308–333. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter T. Calcagno
    • 1
  • Douglas M. Walker
    • 1
  • John D. Jackson
    • 2
  1. 1.College of CharlestonCharlestonUSA
  2. 2.Auburn UniversityAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations