Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Attitude-dependent altruism, turnout and voting

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a goal-oriented model of political participation based on two psychological assumptions. The first is that people are more altruistic towards individuals that agree with them and the second is that people’s well-being rises when other people share their personal opinions. The act of voting is then a source of vicarious utility because it raises the well-being of individuals that agree with the voter. Substantial equilibrium turnout emerges with nontrivial voting costs and modest altruism. The model can explain higher turnout in close elections as well as votes for third-party candidates with no prospect of victory. For certain parameters, these third party candidates lose votes to more popular candidates, a phenomenon often called strategic voting. For other parameters, the model predicts “vote-stealing” where the addition of a third candidate robs a viable major candidate of electoral support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, P. R., Aldrich, J. H., Paolino, P., & Rhode, D. W. (1992). ‘Sophisticated’ voting in the 1988 presidential primaries. American Political Science Review, 86(1), 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, R. M., & Nagler, J. (2000). A new approach for modelling strategic voting in multiparty elections. British Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1447–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, L. M. (1987). Candidate choice and the dynamics of the presidential nominating process. American Journal of Political Science, 31(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A. (2000). To vote or not to vote? Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A., Nadeau, R., Gidengil, E., & Nevitte, N. (2001). The formation of party preferences: Testing the proximity and directional models. European Journal of Political Research, 40(1), 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, H. E., & Sniderman, P. (1985). Attitude attribution: A group basis for political reasoning. American Political Science Review, 79(4), 1061–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. (1984). Voter choice: Evaluating political alternatives. American Behavioral Scientist, 28(2), 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., & Lomasky, L. (1993). Democracy and decision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(3), 713–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, B. E. (1978). Strategic voting in Britain. American Journal of Political Science, 22(3), 639–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, C., & Laband, D. N. (2002). Expressiveness and voting. Public Choice, 110(3–4), 351–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G. W. (1997). Making votes count. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J., & Saloner, G. (1985). Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. RAND Journal of Economics, 16(1), 70–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feddersen, T. J., & Sandroni, A. (2006). A theory of participation in elections. American Economic Review, 96(4), 1271–1282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J., & Fiorina, M. (1974). The paradox of not voting, A decision theoretic analysis. American Political Science Review, 68(2), 525–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, C. B. (1984). The performance of rational voter models in recent presidential elections. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 678–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J. H. (2006). Altruism and turnout. Journal of Politics, 68(3), 674–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Larimer, C. W. (2008). Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large scale field experiment. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geys, B. (2006). Explaining voter turnout: A review of aggregate-level research. Electoral Studies, 25(4), 637–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, R. (2002). Buying a lottery ticket to help the poor. Rationality and Society, 14(1), 55–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanekar, S., & Merchant, S. M. (2001). Helping norms in relation to religious affiliation. Journal of Social Psychology, 141(5), 617–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karylowski, J. (1976). Self-esteem, similarity, liking and helping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 71–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenworthy, J. B., & Miller, N. (2001). Perceptual asymmetry in consensus estimates of majority and minority members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), 597–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S. (1992). Civic norms, social sanctions, and voter turnout. Rationality and Society, 4(2), 133–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, D., & Burden, B. C. (1999). The vote-stealing and turnout effects of Ross Perot in the 1992 U.S. presidential election. American Journal of Political Science, 43(1), 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, G. B., & Converse, P. E. (1979). A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice. American Political Science Review, 73(4), 1055–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S., Mann, L., & Harter, S. (1965). The lost-letter technique: A tool of social research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29(3), 437–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montoya, R. M., & Horton, R. S. (2004). On the importance of cognitive evaluation as a determinant of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(5), 696–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pool, G. J., Wood, W., & Leck, K. (1998). The self-esteem motive in social influence: Agreement with valued majorities and disagreement with derogated minorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 967–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. H., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62(1), 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotemberg, J. J. (2008). Minimally acceptable altruism and the ultimatum game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 66(3–4), 457–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuessler, A. A. (2000). Expressive voting. Rationality and Society, 12(1), 87–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sole, K., Marton, J., & Hornstein, H. A. (1975). Opinion similarity and helping: Three field experiments investigating the bases of promotive tension. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L., Hornstein, H. A., Holloway, S., & Sole, K. (1977). The effects of temptation and information about a stranger on helping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3(3), 416–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhlaner, C. J. (1989). Turnout: The neglected role of groups. American Journal of Political Science, 33(2), 390–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Harvard Business School, Soldiers Field, Boston, MA, 02163, USA

    Julio J. Rotemberg

Authors
  1. Julio J. Rotemberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julio J. Rotemberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rotemberg, J.J. Attitude-dependent altruism, turnout and voting. Public Choice 140, 223–244 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9422-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9422-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation