Public Choice

, Volume 137, Issue 1–2, pp 43–55 | Cite as

Can we insure against political uncertainty? Evidence from the U.S. stock market

  • Andrea Mattozzi


I show that shares currently traded on U.S. stock markets can be used to hedge political uncertainty. Focusing on the 2000 U.S. presidential election, I construct two “presidential portfolios” composed of selected stocks anticipated to fare differently under a Bush versus a Gore presidency. To construct these portfolios I use data on campaign contributions by publicly traded corporations and identify the major contributors on each side. Using daily observations for the six months before the election took place, I show that the excess returns of these portfolios with respect to overall market movements are significantly related to changes in electoral polls.


Political uncertainty Hedge Financial markets 

JEL Classification

D7 G10 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aizcorbe, A. M., Kennickell, A. B., & Moore, K. B. (2003). Recent changes in U.S. family finances: evidence from the 1998 and 2001 survey of consumer finances. Federal Reserve Bulletin,1. Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez, R. M. (1998). Information and elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar
  3. Ayers, B., Cloyd, C. B., & Robinson, J. R. (2005). Read my lips …: does the tax rhetoric of presidential candidates affect security prices? The Journal of Law and Economics, 48, 125–148. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey, M. J. (1996). Implementation of the Thompson mechanism. Public Choice, 89, 231–243. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bailey, M. J. (1997). Toward a new constitution for a future country. Public Choice, 90, 73–115. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertaut, C. C., & Starr-McCluer, M. (2002). Household portfolios in the United States. In L. Guiso, M. Haliassos, & T. Jappelli (Eds.), Household portfolios. Cumberland: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  7. Celentani, M., Conde-Ruiz, J. I., & Desmet, K. (2004). Endogenous policy leads to inefficient risk sharing. Review of Economic Dynamics, 7, 758–787. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cutler, D. (1988). Tax reform and the stock market: an asset price approach. American Economic Review, 78, 1107–1117. Google Scholar
  9. Fisman, R. (2001). Estimating the value of political connections. American Economic Review, 91, 1095–1102. Google Scholar
  10. Forsythe, R., Nelson, F., & Wright, J. (1992). Anatomy of an experimental political stock market. American Economic Review, 82, 1142–1161. Google Scholar
  11. Herron, M. C., Lavin, J., Silver, J., & Cram, D. (1999). Measurement of political effects in the United States economy: a study of the 1992 presidential election. Economics & Politics, 31, 51–81. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knight, B. G. (2007). Are policy platforms capitalized into equity prices? Evidence from the Bush/Gore 2000 presidential election. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 389–409. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mattozzi, A. (2005). Policy uncertainty, electoral securities and redistribution. Working Paper, Caltech. Google Scholar
  14. Musto, D. K., & Yilmaz, B. (2003). Trading and voting. Journal of Political Economy, 111, 990–1003. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pantzalis, C., Stangeland, D. A., & Turtle, H. J. (2000). Political elections and the resolution of uncertainty: the international evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance, 24, 1575–1603. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Roberts, B. E. (1990). Political institutions, policy expectations, and the 1980 election: a financial market perspective. American Journal of Political Science, 34, 289–310. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Santa-Clara, P., & Valkanov, R. (2003). The presidential puzzle: political cycles and the stock market. Journal of Finance, 58, 1841–1872. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sinai, T., & Gyourko, J. (2004). The asset price incidence of capital gains taxes: evidence from the taxpayer relief act of 1997 and publicly-traded real estate firms. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1543–1565. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Thompson, E. A. (1966). A Pareto optimal group decision process. In G. Tullock (Ed.), Papers on non-market decision making. Charlottesville: University of Virginia. Google Scholar
  20. Thompson, E. A. (1967). A reply. Public Choice, 1, 109–112. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of the Humanities and Social SciencesCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations