Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of government structure on local public expenditures

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Though the relationship between local government structure and expenditure has received considerable attention, there is little consensus as to how the features of representative government affect local expenditure. An exception is city council size, which has consistently been found to be positively related to spending. Previous results rely on cross-sectional estimation which may be subject to omitted variable bias. This paper analyzes three components of municipal governments—the form of government, the size of the city council, and the election method of city councilors. Once fixed effects estimation is employed, the positive relationship between city council size and expenditure disappears.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina, A., Baqir, R., & Easterly, W. (1999). Public goods and ethnic divisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 1243–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baqir, R. (2002). Districting and government overspending. Journal of Political Economy, 110, 1318–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booms, B. H. (1966). City governmental form and public expenditure levels. National Tax Journal, 19, 187–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, J. C., & Crain, W. M. (2001). Legislative organization and government spending: cross-country evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 82, 309–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, J. C., & Stephenson, E. F. (2003). Local government structure and public expenditures. Public Choice, 115, 186–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Census Bureau (2002). Government organization. Census of Governments.

  • Deno, K. T., & Mehay, S. L. (1987). Municipal management structure and fiscal performance: do city managers make a difference? Southern Economic Journal, 53, 627–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahy, C. (1998). The choice of local government structure in Massachusetts: a historical public choice perspective. Social Science Quarterly, 79, 433–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnham, P. G. (1990). The impact of citizen influence on local government expenditure. Public Choice, 64, 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, T. W., & Matsusaka, J. G. (2001). Fiscal policy, legislature size, and political parties: evidence from state and local governments in the first half of the 20th century. National Tax Journal, 54, 57–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • International City/County Management Association (2004). The municipal yearbook.

  • Langbein, L. I., Crewson, P., & Brasher, C. N. (1996). Rethinking ward and at-large elections in cities: total spending, the number of locations of selected city services, and policy types. Public Choice, 88, 275–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luttmer, E. F. P. (2001). Group loyalty and the taste for redistribution. The Journal of Political Economy, 109, 500–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehay, S. L., & Seiden, K. P. (1986). Municipal residency laws and local public budgets. Public Choice, 48, 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. R., & Pelissero, J. P. (1980). Urban policy: does political structure matter? American Political Science Review, 74, 999–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, W. R. (2006). Democrats, republicans, and taxes: evidence that political parties matter. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 725–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, G. J. (1991). Tests of institutional versus non-institutional models of local public expenditure determination. Public Choice, 70, 315–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sass, T. R. (1991). The choice of municipal government structure and public expenditures. Public Choice, 72, 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southwick, L. Jr. (1997). Local government spending and at-large versus district representation; do wards result in more ‘pork’? Economics and Politics, 9, 173–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Studenmund, A. H. (1997). Using econometrics: a practical guide (3rd ed.). Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B. R., Shepsle, K. A., & Johnsen, C. (1981). The political economy of benefits and costs: a neoclassical approach to distributive politics. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 642–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zax, J. S. (1989). Initiatives and government expenditures. Public Choice, 63, 267–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Economics Department SH 386, St. Cloud State University, 720 4th Ave S, St. Cloud, MN, 56301, USA

    Lynn MacDonald

Authors
  1. Lynn MacDonald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynn MacDonald.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacDonald, L. The impact of government structure on local public expenditures. Public Choice 136, 457–473 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9308-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9308-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation