Skip to main content

Political freedom, economic freedom, and income convergence: Do stages of economic development matter?

Public Choice volume 135, pages 183–205 (2008)Cite this article

Abstract

In the literature, theory and empirical evidence on the nexus of political freedom, economic freedom, and economic growth are mixed. In this paper, we test the hypothesis that the effect of political freedom on promoting economic growth is realized and detectable at later stages of social and economic development. Using panel data for a sample of 104 countries between 1970 and 2003, we find strong support for our hypothesis. While economic freedom has greater effects on income convergence in the OECD countries, political freedom clearly promotes the convergence among those OECD countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Bardhan, P. (1993). Symposium on democracy and development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7, 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 407–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. (1996). Democracy and growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. (1999). Determinants of democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 107, 158–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1991). Convergence across states and regions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activities.

  • Barro, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 223–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004). Economic growth (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J., Nelson, R., & Wolff, E. N. (Eds.). (1994). Convergence of productivity. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O., & Shleifer, A. (2000). Federalism with and without political centralization: China versus Russia. NBER Working Paper 7616.

  • Clague, C., et al. (1996). Property and contract rights in autocracies and democracies. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 243–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (1993). An inquiry into well-being and destitution. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, J., & Siermann, C. L. J. (1995). New evidence on the relationship between democracy and economic growth. Public Choice, 86, 175–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, J., Lundstrom, S., & Sturm, E. (2006). Market-oriented institutions and policies and economic growth: a critical survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 20, 157–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowrick, S., & Nguyen, D. (1989). OECD comparative economic growth 1950–1985: Catch-up and convergence. American Economic Review, 79, 1010–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr, et al. (1998). Economic freedom, political freedom, and economic well-being: A causality analysis. Cato Journal, 18, 247–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Freedom House. (2005). Freedom in the world country ratings, 1972 through 2003. Washington: the Freedom House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1992). Do old fallacies ever die? Journal of Economic Literature, 30, 2129–2132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier, K. B., & Tullock, G. (1989). An empirical analysis of cross-national economic growth, 1951–1980. Journal of Monetary Economics, 24, 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney, M., & Lawson, R. (2005). Economic freedom of the world: 2005 annual report. Canada: the Fraser Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, S. (1997). Democratic institutions and economic policy. In C. Clague (Ed.), Institutions and economic development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, N. (1995). Growth empirics: a panel data approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics, CX, 1127–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kormendi, R. C., & Meguire, P. G. (1985). Macroeconomic determinants of growth: cross-country evidence. Journal of Monetary Economics, 16, 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, R. A. (2006). On testing the connection between economic freedom and growth. Econ Journal Watch, 3, 398–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R., & Renelt, D. (1992). A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. American Economic Review, 82, 942–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Xu, Z. (2007). Economic convergence in seven Asian economies. Review of Development Economics, 11, 531–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, V. (2000). Development and quality of life: A critique of Amertya Sen’s ‘development as freedom’. International Journal of Health Services, 30, 661–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. A., & Singh, R. D. (1998). Democracy, economic freedom, fiscal policy, and growth in LCDs: A fresh look. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 46, 677–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paldam, M. (2003). The economic freedom of Asian tigers: an essay on controversy. European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 453–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, P., & Tabellini, G. (1992). Growth, income distribution and democracy. European Economic Review, 36, 593–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A., & Limongi, F. (1993). Political regimes and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7, 51–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D. (1993). Galton’s fallacy and tests for the convergence hypothesis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 95, 427–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, V. (1984). Democracy and economic development. Studies on Competitive International Development, 19, 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy, 106, 997–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1999). Where did all the growth go? External shocks, social conflict, and growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 4, 385–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (1995). Economic convergence and economic policies. NBER Working Paper 5039.

  • Scully, G. W. (1988). The institutional framework and economic development. Journal of Political Economy, 96, 652–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scully, G. W. (1992). Constitutional environments and economic growth. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil, R. (2001). Governing Singapore: A history of national development and democracy. St. Leonards: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1991). The world development report 1991. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2005). World development indicators on CD-ROM. Washington: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, W., & Davis, O. A. (1999). The two freedoms, economic growth and development: An empirical study. Public Choice, 100, 39–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, Georgia College & State University, CBX 14, Milledgeville, GA, 31061, USA

    Zhenhui Xu

  2. School of Economics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0615, USA

    Haizheng Li

  3. Hunan University, Hunan, China

    Haizheng Li

Authors
  1. Zhenhui Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Haizheng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenhui Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, Z., Li, H. Political freedom, economic freedom, and income convergence: Do stages of economic development matter?. Public Choice 135, 183–205 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9253-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9253-y

Keywords

  • Income convergence
  • Economic freedom
  • Political freedom
  • Stages of development
  • OECD countries

JEL

  • C12
  • C23
  • O53
  • O57