Advertisement

Public Choice

, Volume 131, Issue 3–4, pp 333–344 | Cite as

The turnout ‘gap’ and the costs of voting – a comparison of participation at the 2001 general and 2002 local elections in England

  • Colin RallingsEmail author
  • Michael Thrasher
Original Article

Abstract

Evidence from both sample surveys and the marked electoral registers is used to compare the participation of individual electors at the 2001 general election and the 2002 local elections in England. In those cases where conventional electoral procedures have been retained, there is a continuing gap between local and general election turnout. Those who vote at both types of election tend to have a sharper sense of civic duty and/or an incentive to vote based on the benefits perceived to be likely to accrue from the outcome of the local contest. However, in those places where the costs of participation are reduced through the introduction of all-postal voting, the turnout gap disappears as does the distinctive character of those who vote in local elections. In each case the findings support a rational choice model of participation with respondents weighing the benefits and costs of voting in the context of their own sense of duty.

Keywords

Local and general elections Turnout Costs and benefits of voting 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berinsky, A., Burns, N., & Traugott, M. (2001). Who votes by mail? A dynamic model of the individual-level consequences of voting-my-mail systems. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 178–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blais, A. (2000). To Vote or Not to Vote? University of Pittsburgh Press: Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  3. Blondel, J., Sinnott, R., & Svensson, P. (1998). People and Parliament in the European Union. Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Clarke, H., Sanders, D., Stewart, M., & Whiteley, P. (2004). Political Choice in Britain. Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. Curtice, J., Seyd, B., & Thomson, K. (2001). Devolution to the Centre: Lessons from London's First Mayoral Elections, CREST Working Paper 90.Google Scholar
  6. Denver, D. (2002). Voting in the 1997 Scottish and Welsh devolution referendums: Information, interests and opinions. European Journal of Political Research, 41, 827–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Denver, D., & Hands, G. (1997). Turnout. In P. Norris & N. Gavin (Eds.), Britain votes 1997. Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. DETR. (2000). 1998 British social attitudes survey: Secondary data analysis of the local government module. DETR: London.Google Scholar
  9. Electoral Commission. (2002). Public opinion and the 2002 Local Elections. Electoral Commission: London.Google Scholar
  10. Franklin, M. (2004). Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  11. Heath, A., McLean, I., & Taylor, B. (1997). How much is at stake? Electoral behaviour in second-order Elections, CREST Working Paper 59.Google Scholar
  12. Heath, A., & Taylor, B. (1999). New Sources of Abstention? In G. Evans & P. Norris (Eds.), Critical elections. Sage: London.Google Scholar
  13. Karp, J., & Banducci, S. (2000). Going postal: How all-mail elections influence turnout. Political Behavior, 22, 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Local Government Association. (1998). Encouraging people to vote. LGA: London.Google Scholar
  15. Miller, W. (1988). Irrelevant elections? Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
  16. Pattie, C., & Johnston, R. (1998). Voter turnout at the British General Election of 1992: Rational choice, social standing or political efficacy? European Journal of Political Research, 33, 263–283.Google Scholar
  17. Rallings, C., & Thrasher, M. (1990). Turnout in local elections: An aggregate data analysis with electoral and contextual data. Electoral Studies, 9, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rallings, C., Thrasher, M. et al. (2000). Turnout at local elections. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions: London.Google Scholar
  19. Reif, K. (1984). National electoral cycles and European elections 1979 and 1984. Electoral Studies, 3, 244–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reif, K., & Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine second order elections. European Journal of Political Research, 8, (3–45), 145–62.Google Scholar
  21. Riker W., & Ordeshook, P. (1968). A Theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62, 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Southwell, P. L. (2004). Five years later: A re-assessment of Oregon's vote by mail electoral process. PS-Political Science & Politics, 37(1), 89–93.Google Scholar
  23. Swaddle, K., & Heath, A. (1989). Official and reported turnout in the British General Election of 1987. British Journal of Political Science, 19, 537–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Heerde, J., Johnson, M., & Bowler, S. (2004). Barriers to participation, voter sophistication, and candidate spending choices in U.S. senate elections, 1990–1994. Paper presented at 2004 annual meeting of the Elections, Public Opinion and Parties workgroup, University of Oxford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Local Government Chronicle Elections CentreUniversity of PlymouthPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations