Abstract
In unitary states, competitive decentralisation structures can take place by increasing the visibility of politically accountable jurisdictions in certain policy responsibilities such as health care. Drawing from the Spanish decentralisation process we examine the mechanisms (and determinants) of vertical competition in the development of health policies in the Spanish National Health System. The Spanish example provides qualitative evidence of vertical competition that assimilates government outcomes of unitary states to that of federal structures. The Spanish experience indicates that the specific vertical competition mechanisms in place until 2002 are likely to be responsible for significant policy innovation and welfare state development.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Besley, T., & Case, A. (1995). ‘Incumbent Behaviour, Vote Seeking, Tax Setting and Yardstick Competition,’ American Economic Review, 85, 25–45.
Besley, T., & Coate, S. (1999). Centralised vs Decentralised Provision of Local Public Goods: a Political Economy Analysis, NBER Working Paper, Cambridge.
Besley, T., & Smart, M. (2003). Does Tax Competition Raise Voter Welfare? C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers, 3031.
Boyne, G., & Powell, M. (1993). Territorial Justice and Thatcherism, Environment and Planning, C, 11, 35–53.
Brenan, G., & Buchanan, J. (1980). The Power to Tax (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Breton, A. (1996). Competitive Governments. An Economic Theory of Politics and Public Finance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Breton, A., & Fraschini, A. (2003). Vertical competition in unitary states: the case of Italy. Public Choice, 114, 57–77.
Brueckner, J. K. (2000). Welfare Reform and Race to the Bottom: Theory and Evidence. Southern Economic Journal, 66, 505–525.
Costa-Font, J., Rodriguet-Oleggia, E. & Luna-Pla, D. (2003). Political competition and peribarrel politics in the allocation of public investment in Mexico. Public choice, 116, 195–204.
Congleton, R. D., Kyriacou, A., & Ani Bacaria, J. (2003). A Theory of Menu Federalism: Decentralization by Political Agreement. Constitutional Political Economy, 14, 167– 190.
Frey, B. S., & Eichenberger, R. (1996). ‘Competitive Governments for Europe,’ International Review of Law and Economics, 16, 315–27.
George, A. (2003). Accountability in Health Services. Transforming Relationships and Contexts.Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Working Paper Series, vol. 13 1 (February).
Hausken, K., Martin, C. W., & Plümper, T. (2004). Government spending and taxation in Democracies and autocracies. Constitutional Political Economy, 15, 239– 259.
Josselin, J.-M., & Marciano, A. (2004). Federalism and Conflicts over Principalship. Some Insights into the American Constitutional History. Constitutional Political Economy, 15: 281–304
Kenyon, D. A., & Kincaid, J. (eds.) Competition among States and Local Governments (Washington: Urban Institute).
Kneebone, R. D. (1992). ‘Centralisation and the Size of Government in Canada,’ Applied Economics, vol. 24, pp. 1293–1300.
Leeson, H. (2002). Constitutional Jurisdiction over Health and Health care in Canada, Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada, Discussion Paper, no. 12
López Casasnovas, G. (1998). ‘Financiación autonómica y gasto sanitario público en España’ Papeles de Economía Española, 76, 2–14.
López Casasnovas, G. (2002). The Development of New Regional Health Policies and the Need for Coordination: The Case of the Pharmaceutical Market, XXII Jornadas de Economía de la Salud (Pamplona).
Lopez-Casasnovas, G., Costa-Font, J., & Planas, I. (2005). Diversity and regional inequalities: Assessing the outcomes of the Spanish ‘system of health care services’, Health Economics 14(5); 5221–5235
Lovering, J. (1999). ‘Theory Led by Policy: The Inadequacies of the New Regionalism,’ International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23, 379–95.
Oates, W. (1977). The Political Economy of Federalism (Lexington Massachusetts: Lexington Books).
OECD (1997). Managing Across Levels Of Government, Spain. Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development [http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/9/33/1902255.pdf, visited April 2004]
Redwood, J. (1999). The Death of Britain (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
Rico, A., & Costa-Font, J. (2005). Power Rather than Path? The Dynamics of Institutional Change under Health Care Federalism. Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law 30(i); 231–252.
Rico, A. (2000). ‘Health Policy under Asymmetric Federalism: Twenty Years of Regional Devolution in Spain,’ Eurohealth, 6(3) 28–9.
Rico, A., Fraile, M., & González, P. (1998). ‘Regional Decentralization of Health Care Policy in Spain: Social Capital does not Tell the Whole Story,’ West European Politics, 21(4) 180–99.
Salmon, P. (1987). Decentralisation as an incentive scheme. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 3, 24–43.
Salmon, P. (2000). ‘Vertical Competition in a Unitary State,’ in G. Galeotti, P. Salomon, & R. Wintrobe (Eds.) Competition and Structure: the Political Economy of Collective Decisions: Essays in Honour of Albert Breton (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Sawicky, M. B. (1999). ‘The new American devolution: Problems and Prospects,’ in M.B.Sawicky (eds) The End of Welfare? Consequences of Federal Devolution for the Nation (Economic Policy Institute, USA).
Stein, E (1997). Fiscal Decentralization and Government Size in Latin America. In Fukasaku, K. and Hausmann, R. (Eds). Democracy, Descentralisation and Deficits in Latin America, IDB-OECD.
Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures,’ Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–24.
Walker, J. L. (1969). The Diffusion of innovations among American States. American Political Science Review, 77, 880–99.
Weisbrod, B. A. (1977). The Voluntary Non-Profit Sector: Economic Theory and Public Policy (Lexington: Lexington Press).
Wittman, R. (1989). Why democracies produce efficient results?. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1395–1424.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Costa-Font, J., Rico, A. Vertical Competition in the Spanish National Health System (NHS). Public Choice 128, 477–498 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-9011-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-9011-y