Abstract
In the aftermath of the Florida debacle in the 2000 Presidential election, there has been an emphasis on replacing voting equipment perceived as inferior (e.g., punch card ballots) with more technologically advanced voting methods. It is possible, however, that not all voters will be comfortable with high-tech voting devices. Elderly voters, for example, might be familiar with the old voting machines but apprehensive about computerized voting. If this is the case, the fear of new voting technology might cause the turnout of elderly voters to decrease. We test for this effect by analyzing the change in voter turnout across Georgia counties in the two most recent gubernatorial elections, as it relates to the share of the counties’ populations that is over the age of 65 years. Consistent with the hypothesis that computers scare the elderly, we find a significantly negative relationship between the change in voter turnout and the elderly share of the population. An additional 1% of the population that is elderly is associated with a 0.3–0.4% decrease in turnout. The hypothesis that elderly voters were apprehensive about the change in voting technology is also supported by the increase in absentee balloting.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Ashefelter, O., & Kelley, S., Jr. (1975). Determinants of participation in Presidential elections. Journal of Law and Economics, 18, 695–733.
Barzel, Y., & Silberberg, E. (1973). Is the act of voting rational? Public Choice, 16, 51–58.
Brand, P. (2003). Election reform gets initial senate funding. The Hill, January 22, 12.
Broder, D. (2003). Upbeat slogan can’t put an end to Sad Flag Issue. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, January 17, A17.
Calmes, J. (2002). At the polls, voters face some glitches but not chaos. The Wall Street Journal, November 6, A4.
Cox, C. (2000). Secretary [of State] Cox: 2000 election data shows undervote rates consistent among all voting equipment (Press Release). December 28, www.sos.state.ga.us/ pressrel/pr001228.htm.
Cox, C. (2002). Secretary [of State] Cox announces selection of Diebold election systems to provide new statewide electronic voting system (Press Release). May 3, www.sos.state.ga.us/ pressrel/050302.htm.
Filer, J. E., & Kenny, L. W. (1980). Voter turnout and the benefits of voting. Public Choice, 35, 575–585.
Filer, J. E., Kenny, L. W., & Morton, R. (1991). Voting laws, educational policies, and minority turnout. Journal of Law and Economics, 34, 371–394.
Franklin, S. (2003). Perdue needs to choose principle over politics and scrap flag referendum. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, February 17, A11.
Knack, S. (1994) Does rain help the Republicans? Theory and evidence on turnout and the vote. Public Choice, 79, 187–209.
Matsusaka, J. (1993). Election closeness and voter turnout: Evidence from California ballot propositions. Public Choice, 76, 313–334.
Matsusaka, J., & Palda, F. (1999). Voter turnout: How much can we explain? Public Choice, 98, 431–446.
Richardson, R. L. (2003). Sorry, Bubba; you’ve been snookered. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, February 5, A15.
Rome News-Tribune (2002). Political machinery (Unsigned editorial). May 30, 4A.
Samuelson, R. J. (2002). Debunking the digital divide. The Washington Post, March 20, A33.
Shachar, R., & Nalebuff, B. (1999). Follow the leader: Theory and evidence on political participation. American Economic Review, 89, 525–547.
Stanford, D. D. (2002). Elections chiefs ready, a bit nervous. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, November 5, 6B.
Stavins, J. (2001). Effect of consumer characteristics on the use of payment instruments. New England Economic Review, 2001, 19–31.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roseman, G.H., Stephenson, E.F. The Effect of Voting Technology on Voter Turnout: Do Computers Scare the Elderly?. Public Choice 123, 39–47 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-3993-3
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-3993-3