Skip to main content
Log in

The limits of `independence' and the policy of the ECB^*

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is argued that the European Central Bank's independence is not as secure as it seems and that as a result it has appreciable institutional incentives to protect and enhance its position. It follows that its behaviour should not be understood as being solely determined by the pursuit of price stability. One consequence is that certain points on which it has been criticised on the basis that its approach makes for ineffective monetary policy might be better understood as, often effective, attempts to protect its position. Another is that making a central bank (or any other institution) “completely independent'' may be much harder than it seems, and failed attempts, which come close, are not necessarily to be preferred, even by the advocates of independence, to less ambitious designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acheson, K., & Chant, J. (1972). The choice of monetary policy instruments and the theory of bureaucracy Public Choice, 12, 13–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banaian, K., Laney, L. O., & Willet, T. D. (1983). Central bank independence: An international comparison Economic Review of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, 1–22.

  • Beck, N. (1994). Politics and monetary policy. In P. L. Siklos (Ed.), Varieties of Monetary Reforms: Lessons and Experiences on the Road to Monetary Union (pp. 193–218). Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston/Dordrecht/London.

  • Begg, D., de Grauwe, P., Giavazzi, F., Uhlig, H., & Wyplosz, C. (1998). The ECB: Safe at any speed? Monitoring the European Central Bank 1, CEPR: London.

  • Berman, S., & McNamara, K. (1999). Bank on democracy: Why central banks need public oversight. Foreign Affairs, 78(2), 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bini-Smaghi, L., & Gros, D. (2000). Open Issues in European Central Banking, Macmillan, London.

  • Blanchard, O. (1997). Macroeconomics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A., Goodhart, C., Hildebrand, P., Lipton, D., & Wyplosz, C. (2001). How Do Central Banks Talk?, International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies, Geneva.

  • Buiter, W. (1999). Alice in Euroland. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(2), 181–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buti, M., Eijffinger, S. C. W., & Franco, D. (2003). Revisiting EMU's stability pact: A pragmatic way forward. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(1), 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cukierman, A., Webb, S., & Neyapti, B. (1992). Measuring the independence of central banks and its effect on policy outcomes. World Bank Economic Review, 6, 353–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daintith, T. (1995). Between domestic democracy and an alien rule of law? Some thoughts on the ‘independence’ of the Bank of England. Public Law, 118–132.

  • de Grauwe, P. (1992). The Economics of Monetary Integration. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, K. (1994). Elusive Union, Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, K., & Featherstone, K. (1999), The Road to Maastricht, Oxford: OUP.

  • ECB (1999). Monthly Bulletin, January.

  • ECB (2003a). Monthly Bulletin, May.

  • ECB (2003b). Monthly Bulletin, June.

  • Eichengreen, B., & Wyplosz, C. (1998). Stability Pact. More than a minor nuisance? Economic Policy, 26, 67–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgie, R. (1998). Democratic accountability and central bank independence: Historical and contemporary, national and European perspectives. West European Politics, 21(3), 53–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, M., Gros, D., Italianer, A., Pisani-Ferry, J., & Reichenbach, H. (1992) One Market, One Money. Oxford: OUP.

  • European Monetary Institute (1997). The Single Monetary Policy in Stage Three: Specification of an Operational Framework. Frankfurt: EMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (1998). Democratic accountability in the third stage of EMU. Official Journal, C138, 177.

  • Favero, C., Freixas, X., Persson, T., & Wyplosz, C. (2000). One money, many countries. Monitoring the European Central Bank 2. London: CEPR.

  • Forder, J. (2002). Democracy and the European Central Bank. London: New Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giavazzi, F., & Pagano, M. (1988). The advantage of tying one's hands European Economic Review, 32, pp. 1055–1082.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, J. B. (1991). The politics of Central Bank independence. Comparative Politics, 23(3), 329–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gormley, L., & de Haan, J. (1996). The democratic deficit of the European Central Bank. European Law Review, 21, pp. 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier, K. (1991). Congressional influence on US monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 201–220.

  • Grilli, V., Masciandaro, D., & Tabellini, G. (1991). Political and monetary institutions and public financial policies in the industrial countries. Economic Policy, 13, 342–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harden, I. (1990). Eurofed or ‘monster bank’? National Westminster Bank Quarterly Review, August, 2–13.

  • Haselbach, D. (1998). Fabricating nationhood: A case study of Germany Debatte, 6(2), 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, D. (2003). Cutting the bank down to size: Efficient and legitimate decision-making in the European Central Bank after enlargement. Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(3) 397–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Issing, O. (1999). The Eurosystem: transparent and accountable or ‘Willem in Euroland? Journal of Common Market Studies, 37, 503–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Issing, O. (2000). The European Central Bank as a new institution and the problem of accountability. In J. de Haan (ed.), The history of the Bundesbank (pp. 143–157). Routledge, London.

  • Issing, O., Gaspar, V., Angeloni, I., & Tristani, O. (2001). Monetary Policy in the Euro Area. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, D., & Earnshaw, D. (2003). The European Parliament, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, E. (1980). Politics and Fed policymaking: The more things change, the more they stay the same. Journal of Monetary Economics, 5, 199–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, E. (1988). Fedbashing and the role of monetary arrangements in managing political stress. In T. D Willett (ed.), Political business cycles (pp. 479–489). London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamy, P., & Pisani-Ferry, J. (2002). The Europe We Want, London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, S. (1992). The optimal degree of commitment: Credibility and flexibility. American Economic Review, 82, 273–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, S. (1999). In E. E. Meade (ed.), The European Central Bank. How accountable? How decentralized? (pp. 15–38). Washington, DC: American Institute for Contemporary German Studies.

  • Machin, H., & Wright, V. (1985). Economic policy and policymaking under the Mitterrand Presidency, 1981–1984. London: Pinter.

  • Maxfield, S. (1997). Gatekeepers of growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, K. (1998). The Currency of Ideas. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, K. (2002). Rational fictions: Central bank independence and the social logic of delegation. West European Politics, 25(1), 47–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundell, R. A. (1961). A theory of optimal currency areas American Economic Review, 51, 657–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, M. (1991). Central Bank independence as a prerequisite of price stability. European Economy Special edn. No. 1, The Economics of EMU.

  • Nugent, N. (1999). The Government and Politics of the European Union. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, M., & Bade, R. (1988). Central Bank Laws and Monetary Policy. Unpublished mimeo, Toronto: University of Toronto.

  • Pierce, J. (1978). The myth of Congressional supervision of monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 3, 363–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posen, A. (1995). Declarations are not enough: Financial sector sources of central bank independence. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 253–274.

  • Randzio-Plath, C. (1999). The European Central Bank: Challenges for the ECB and the European democratic system, in E. E. Meade (ed.), The European Central Bank. How Accountable? How Decentralized? Washington DC: American Institute for Contemporary German Studies.

  • Sandholz, W. (1993). Choosing union: Monetary politics and Maastricht. International Organization, 47, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siedentop, L. (2000). Democracy in Europe, London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaggs, N. (1984). A theory of the bureaucratic value of Federal Reserve operating procedures. Public Choice, 43, 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2000). The role and status of the European Central Bank: Some proposals for accountability and co-operation. In C. Crouch (ed.), After the Euro (pp. 179–202). Oxford: OUP.

  • Tsoukalis, L. (1977). The politics and economics of European monetary integration. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaubel, R. (2003). In F. H. Capie, & G. E. Wood (Eds.), Monetary unions. Theory, history, public choice London: Routledge.

  • Weingast, B., & Moran, M. (1983). Bureaucratic discretion or congressional control? Regulatory policymaking by the federal trade commission. Journal of Political Economy, 91, 765–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, J. T. (1985). Central banks and inflation. In L. N. Lindberg, & C. The politics of inflation and economic stagnation (pp. 318–348). Washington, DC: Maier Brookings.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Forder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forder, J. The limits of `independence' and the policy of the ECB^*. Public Choice 125, 431–444 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-3057-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-3057-8

Keywords

Navigation