Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“Public goods”: An exercise in calibration

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers a measure of the “publicness” of goods and services implicit in responses that individuals make when asked about public sector spending. At the limit, all consumers consume equal amounts of a public good. Thus any differences between an individual's self-interest preferences and public-interest preferences cannot be based on differential provision, but only on differences in the individual's public- and self-interest utility functions. If we rule out the latter, self-interest and public-interest preferences for a pure public good are identical. Using sample survey data it is possible to calibrate the public good content of different public goods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amemiya, T. (1981). Qualitative response models, a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 19, 1484–1536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, M. (1970). An introduction to the economics of education. Harmondsworth; Penguin.

  • Borcherding, T. E., & Deacon, R. T. (1972). The demand for the services of non-federal governments. American Economic Review, 62, 842–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook, L., Hall, J., & Preston, I. (1996). Public spending and taxation. In R. Jowell, J. Curtice, A. Park, L. Brook & K. Thomson (Eds), British social attitudes, The 13th report (pp. 185–202). Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. V., & Jackson, P. M. (1992). Public sector economics (4th ed). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1968). The demand and supply of public goods. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1974). The lighthouse in economics. Journal of Law and Economics, 17, 357–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, S. C. (1987). The impact of congestion on local public good production. Journal of Public Economics, 32, 679–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1960). Why the government budget is ‘too small’ in a democracy. World Politics, 12, 541–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A. W. (1970). Private goods, externality, public goods. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 17, 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Pommerehne, W. W. (1989). Muses and markets; explorations in the economics of the arts. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1957). A theory of the consumption function. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, F., Machin, S., & Manning, A. (1996). The employer size-wage effect – can dynamic monopsony provide an explanation. Oxford Economic Papers, 40, 433–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, J. G. (1962). Public goods and public policy. Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 17, 197–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, D. (1986). Fiscal illusion from grants and the level of state and federal expenditures. National Tax Journal, 39, 471–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, R. G., & Sobel, R. S. (1995). Empirical evidence on the publicness of state legislative activities. Public Choice, 83, 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, J., & Jones, P. R. (1994). The importance of the `ethical voter': An estimate of ‘altruism.’ European Journal of Political Economy, 10, 499–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, D. (1987). Public finance: A contemporary application of theory to policy (2nd ed). New York: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. R. (1993). Preferences for private goods: A public choice critique of the political process. Political Studies, 41, 492–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jowell, R., Curtice, J., Park, A., Brook, L., & Thomson, K. (1996). British social attitudes: The 13th report. Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. (1990). The politics and pitfalls of reducing waste in the military. Defence Economics, 1, 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees, D. (1962). The logic of the British National Health Service. Journal of Law and Economics, 5, 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. A. (1955). Comment on the pure theory of public expenditure, Review of Economics and Statistics, 37, 347–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R. A. (1969). Provision for social goods. In J. Margolis & M. Guitton (Eds.), Public economics (pp. 124–144). New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, R., & Cripps, M. (1993). An economic theory of the open shop trade union. European Economic review, 37, 1599–1620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, A. (1979). The economic analysis of government and related themes. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peston, M. (1972). Public goods and the public sector. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploeg, R. van der. (2002). In art we trust. De Economist, 150, 333–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, I. & Ridge, M. (1995). Demand for local public spending: Evidence from the British Attitudes Survey. Economic Journal, 105, 644–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 387–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1969). Pure theory of public expenditure and taxation. In J. Margolis & H Guitton (Eds.), Public economics (pp. 98–123). New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, T. (1977). Impurity of defense: An application to the economics of alliances. Kyklos, 30, 443–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schram, A. (1990). A dynamic model of voter behavior and the demand for public goods among social groups in Great Britain. Journal of Public Economics, 41, 147–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schram, A., & Van Winden, F. (1989). Revealed preferences for public goods; Applying a model of voter behavior. Public Choice, 60, 259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1959). Some problems of majority voting. Journal of Political Economy, 67, 571–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, K. (1973). Topics in applied economics. London: Gray-Mills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyckoff, J. H. (1984). The nonexcludable publicness of primary and secondary public education. Journal of Public Economics, 24, 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Jones.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hudson, J., Jones, P. “Public goods”: An exercise in calibration. Public Choice 124, 267–282 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-2048-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-2048-0

Keywords

Navigation