Abstract
This paper considers a measure of the “publicness” of goods and services implicit in responses that individuals make when asked about public sector spending. At the limit, all consumers consume equal amounts of a public good. Thus any differences between an individual's self-interest preferences and public-interest preferences cannot be based on differential provision, but only on differences in the individual's public- and self-interest utility functions. If we rule out the latter, self-interest and public-interest preferences for a pure public good are identical. Using sample survey data it is possible to calibrate the public good content of different public goods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amemiya, T. (1981). Qualitative response models, a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 19, 1484–1536.
Blaug, M. (1970). An introduction to the economics of education. Harmondsworth; Penguin.
Borcherding, T. E., & Deacon, R. T. (1972). The demand for the services of non-federal governments. American Economic Review, 62, 842–853.
Brook, L., Hall, J., & Preston, I. (1996). Public spending and taxation. In R. Jowell, J. Curtice, A. Park, L. Brook & K. Thomson (Eds), British social attitudes, The 13th report (pp. 185–202). Aldershot: Dartmouth.
Brown, C. V., & Jackson, P. M. (1992). Public sector economics (4th ed). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Buchanan, J. M. (1968). The demand and supply of public goods. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Coase, R. (1974). The lighthouse in economics. Journal of Law and Economics, 17, 357–376.
Craig, S. C. (1987). The impact of congestion on local public good production. Journal of Public Economics, 32, 679–690.
Downs, A. (1960). Why the government budget is ‘too small’ in a democracy. World Politics, 12, 541–563.
Evans, A. W. (1970). Private goods, externality, public goods. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 17, 79–89.
Frey, B. S., & Pommerehne, W. W. (1989). Muses and markets; explorations in the economics of the arts. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Friedman, M. (1957). A theory of the consumption function. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Green, F., Machin, S., & Manning, A. (1996). The employer size-wage effect – can dynamic monopsony provide an explanation. Oxford Economic Papers, 40, 433–455.
Head, J. G. (1962). Public goods and public policy. Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 17, 197–219.
Hewitt, D. (1986). Fiscal illusion from grants and the level of state and federal expenditures. National Tax Journal, 39, 471–483.
Holcombe, R. G., & Sobel, R. S. (1995). Empirical evidence on the publicness of state legislative activities. Public Choice, 83, 47–58.
Hudson, J., & Jones, P. R. (1994). The importance of the `ethical voter': An estimate of ‘altruism.’ European Journal of Political Economy, 10, 499–509.
Hyman, D. (1987). Public finance: A contemporary application of theory to policy (2nd ed). New York: Dryden.
Jones, P. R. (1993). Preferences for private goods: A public choice critique of the political process. Political Studies, 41, 492–505.
Jowell, R., Curtice, J., Park, A., Brook, L., & Thomson, K. (1996). British social attitudes: The 13th report. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
Lee, D. (1990). The politics and pitfalls of reducing waste in the military. Defence Economics, 1, 129–139.
Lees, D. (1962). The logic of the British National Health Service. Journal of Law and Economics, 5, 111–118.
Margolis, J. A. (1955). Comment on the pure theory of public expenditure, Review of Economics and Statistics, 37, 347–349.
Musgrave, R. A. (1969). Provision for social goods. In J. Margolis & M. Guitton (Eds.), Public economics (pp. 124–144). New York: St. Martin's Press.
Naylor, R., & Cripps, M. (1993). An economic theory of the open shop trade union. European Economic review, 37, 1599–1620.
Peacock, A. (1979). The economic analysis of government and related themes. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
Peston, M. (1972). Public goods and the public sector. London: Macmillan.
Ploeg, R. van der. (2002). In art we trust. De Economist, 150, 333–362.
Preston, I. & Ridge, M. (1995). Demand for local public spending: Evidence from the British Attitudes Survey. Economic Journal, 105, 644–660.
Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 387–389.
Samuelson, P. A. (1969). Pure theory of public expenditure and taxation. In J. Margolis & H Guitton (Eds.), Public economics (pp. 98–123). New York: St. Martin's Press.
Sandler, T. (1977). Impurity of defense: An application to the economics of alliances. Kyklos, 30, 443–460.
Schram, A. (1990). A dynamic model of voter behavior and the demand for public goods among social groups in Great Britain. Journal of Public Economics, 41, 147–182.
Schram, A., & Van Winden, F. (1989). Revealed preferences for public goods; Applying a model of voter behavior. Public Choice, 60, 259–282.
Tullock, G. (1959). Some problems of majority voting. Journal of Political Economy, 67, 571–579.
Wallis, K. (1973). Topics in applied economics. London: Gray-Mills.
Wyckoff, J. H. (1984). The nonexcludable publicness of primary and secondary public education. Journal of Public Economics, 24, 331–351.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hudson, J., Jones, P. “Public goods”: An exercise in calibration. Public Choice 124, 267–282 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-2048-0
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-2048-0