Skip to main content
Log in

Explaining the Enhanced HIPC Initiative: A Response to Michaelowa (2003)

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Michaelowa (2003, 2002) proposes a political-economy model to explain the re-design of the Heavily Indebted Poor Country (HIPC) debt reliefinitiative in 1999. The principal assumption justifying the adoption of thisalternative approach is an alleged paucity, if not non-existence, of applied economic research on sustainable debt levels. This note challenges that assumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Callaghy, T. (2002). Innovation in the sovereign debt regime: From the Paris Club to enhanced HIPC and beyond. Mimeo. Operations Evaluation Department. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. (1998). The sustainability of African debt. In D. Cohen (Ed.), Contemporary economic issues. Proceedings of the Eleventh World Congress of the International Economic Association: volume 3: trade, payments and debt, 160–181. Houndmills: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldabawi, I.A., Ndulu, B.J. and Ndung’u, N. (1997). Debt overhang and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Z. Iqbal and R. Kanbur (Eds.), External finance for low-income countries, 49–76. Washington, D.C.: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautam, M. (2003). Debt relief for the poorest: An OED review of the HIPC initiative. Operations Evaluation Department. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjertholm, P. (2003a). Theoretical and empirical foundations of HIPC debt sustainability targets. Journal of Development Studies 39: 67–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjertholm, P. (2003b). Debt sustainability thresholds: A note on Underwood (1990). Mimeo. Institute of Economics, University of Copenhagen.

  • IMF (2002). Assessing sustainability. Policy Development and Review Department. Washington, D.C.

  • IMF and World Bank (2001). The challenge of maintaining long-term external debt sustainability. Washington, D.C.

  • IMF and World Bank (1996). Analytical aspects of the debt problems of heavily-indebted poor countries. Washington, D.C.

  • Michaelowa, K. (2003). The political economy of the enhanced HIPC-initiative. Public Choice 114: 461–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelowa, K. (2002). The political economy of the enhanced HIPC-Initiative. HWWA Discussion Paper 161. Hamburg: Hamburg Institute of International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan Guaranty Trust (1983). Global debt: Assessment and long-term strategy. World Financial Markets June: 1–15.

  • Pattillo, C., Poirson, H. and Ricci, L. (2002). External debt and growth. IMF Working Paper WP/02/69. Washington, D.C.: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, H.J. (1977). Debt crises of developing countries: A pragmatic approach to an early warning system. Konjunkturpolitik 23: 94–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stymne, J. (1993). Reducing the debt burden of Sub-Saharan Africa. In M. Blomström and M. Lundahl (Eds.), Economic crisis in Africa: Perspectives on policy responses, 75–98. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, J. (1990). The sustainability of international debt. Mimeo. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hjertholm, P. Explaining the Enhanced HIPC Initiative: A Response to Michaelowa (2003). Public Choice 121, 481–483 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-004-3285-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-004-3285-3

Keywords

Navigation