Skip to main content
Log in

Tax Britannica: Nineteenth Century Tariffs and British National Income

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The literature on British economic history presumes thatBritain was a free trader after the repeal of the Corn Lawsand that her tariff levels were thus below those which wereoptimal for maximizing utility. Presumably, if the optimalBritish tariffs had been positive and greater than the levelsestablished by mid-century, a reduction to zero of all tariffsthat remained would have lowered British welfare even further.In this paper, we use a simple computable general equilibriummodel to simulate a drop in all British tariffs to zero. Theresulting substantial net increase in British welfaresuggests that British tariffs were much higher than would beconsistent with an optimum tariff policy. More important, thesize of British losses from her high tariff levels suggeststhat British policy was not consistent with the stance of anideological free trader.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, G.M. and Tollison, R.D. (1985). Ideology, interest groups, and the repeal of the Corn Laws. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 141: 197–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.E. and Neary, J.P. (1994). Measuring the restrictiveness of trade policy. The World Bank Economic Review 8: 151–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.E. (1995). Trade restrictiveness benchmarks. Mimeo.

  • Dakhlia, S. (2002). A generalized Trade Restrictiveness Index. SSRN Working Paper.

  • France (1858). Administration des douanes. Tableau Décennal du Commerce de la France, 1847–1856 (Paris).

  • France (1878). Administration des douanes. Tableau Décennal du Commerce de la France, 1867–1876 (Paris).

  • Irwin, D.A. (1988). Welfare effects of British free trade: debate and evidence from the 1840s. Journal of Political Economy 96: 1142–1164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, D.A. (1993). Free trade and protection in nineteenth-century Britain and France revisited: A comment on Nye. Journal of Economic History 51: 146–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R.W. (1971). A three-factor model in theory, trade, and history. In J. Bhagwati, R.W. Jones, R.A. Mundell and J. Vanek (Eds.), Trade, balance of payments and growth: Papers in international economics in honor of Charles P. Kindleberger. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindleberger, C.P. (1975). The rise of free trade in western Europe, 1820–1875. Journal of Economic History 35: 20–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D.N. (1980). Magnanimous albion: Free trade and British national income, 1841–1881. Explorations in Economic History 17: 303–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercenier, J. and Yeldan, E. (1999). A plea for greater attention on the data in policy analysis. Journal of Policy Modeling 21: 851–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J.V. (1991). The myth of free-trade Britain and fortress France: Tariffs and trade in the nineteenth century. Journal of Economic History 51: 23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J.V. (2004). War, wine, taxes. Manuscript in progress.

  • O’Rourke, K. (1997). Measuring protection: A cautionary tale. Journal of Development Economics 53: 169–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. (1971). Ohlin was right. Swedish Journal of Economics 73: 365–384.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dakhlia, S., Nye, J.V. Tax Britannica: Nineteenth Century Tariffs and British National Income. Public Choice 121, 309–333 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-004-1680-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-004-1680-4

Keywords

Navigation