Skip to main content
Log in

Adjunctive Nonconvulsive Electrotherapy for Patients with Depression: a Systematic Review

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of adjunctive nonconvulsive electrotherapy (NET) for patients with depression are undetermined. This systematic review was conducted to examine the efficacy and safety of adjunctive NET for patients with depression. Chinese (WanFang and Chinese Journal Net) and English (PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library) databases were systematically searched from their inception until Jan 27, 2021 by three independent investigators. One randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 3 treatment arms (n = 108) and two observational studies (single-group, before-after design, n = 31) were included. In the RCT, the antidepressant efficacy of NET on depression was similar to that of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) (P > 0.05) but with significantly fewer neurocognitive impairments as measured by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) (P < 0.05). In two observational studies, the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) scores decreased significantly from baseline to post-NET (all Ps < 0.05), without adverse neurocognitive effects. In the RCT, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were not separately reported among the 3 treatment arms but a similar rate of discontinuation was reported. The currently available limited evidence from 3 studies suggests that NET as an adjunctive treatment may be a safe, well-tolerated, effective therapy for depression without serious neurocognitive impairments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

The data of this article are included within the article.

Abbreviations

ADs:

Antidepressants

ADRs:

Adverse drug reactions

CBF:

Cerebral blood flow

dTMS:

Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation

ECT:

Electroconvulsive therapy

HAMD-17:

17-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale

HF-rTMS:

High-frequency repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation

LF-rTMS:

Low-frequency repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation

MCCB:

MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery

MMSE:

Mini-Mental State Exam

NET:

Nonconvulsive electrotherapy

RBANS:

Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

rTMS:

Repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation

TMS:

Transcranial magnetic stimulation

TRD:

Treatment-refractory depression

WCST:

Wisconsin Card Sorting Test

References

  1. Huang R, Wang K, Hu J. Effect of probiotics on depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients. 2016;8(8):483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Murray CJ, Barber RM, Foreman KJ, Abbasoglu Ozgoren A, Abd-Allah F, Abera SF, et al. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition. Lancet. 2015;386(10009):2145–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kikuchi T, Suzuki T, Uchida H, Watanabe K, Mimura M. Association between antidepressant side effects and functional impairment in patients with major depressive disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2013;210(1):127–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, Nierenberg AA, Warden D, Ritz L, et al. Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(1):28–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Voineskos D, Daskalakis ZJ, Blumberger DM. Management of treatment-resistant depression: challenges and strategies. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020;16:221–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Borrione L, Bellini H, Razza LB, Avila AG, Baeken C, Brem AK, et al. Precision non-implantable neuromodulation therapies: a perspective for the depressed brain. Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999). Braz J Psychiatry. 2020;42(4):403–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dominiak M, Antosik-Wójcińska AZ, Goetz Z, Sikorska O, Stefanowski B, Gorostiza D, et al. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of formula-based unilateral vs bilateral electroconvulsive therapy in the treatment of major depression: a randomized open label controlled trial. J Psychiatr Res. 2021;133:52–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. UK Ect Review Group. Efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy in depressive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2003;361(9360):799–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson L. Treating major depression and comorbid disorders with transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Affect Disord. 2020;276:453–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McClintock SM, Reti IM, Carpenter LL, McDonald WM, Dubin M, Taylor SF, et al. Consensus recommendations for the clinical application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2018;79(1):16cs10905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Regenold WT, Noorani RJ, Piez D, Patel P. Nonconvulsive electrotherapy for treatment resistant unipolar and bipolar major depressive disorder: a proof-of-concept trial. Brain Stimul. 2015;8(5):855-61.

  12. Weiner RD. The practice of electroconvulsive therapy: recommendations for treatment, training, and privileging: a task force report of the American Psychiatric Association. American Psychiatric Pub. 2018.

  13. Squire LR. ECT and memory loss. Am J Psychiatry. 1977;134(9):997–1001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang G, Zheng W, Li XB, Wang SB, Cai DB, Yang XH, et al. ECT augmentation of clozapine for clozapine-resistant schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Psychiatr Res. 2018;105:23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zheng W, Jiang ML, He HB, Li RP, Li QL, Zhang CP, et al. A preliminary study of adjunctive nonconvulsive electrotherapy for treatment-refractory depression. Psychiatr Q. 2020;92(1):311–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gersner R, Toth E, Isserles M, Zangen A. Site-specific antidepressant effects of repeated subconvulsive electrical stimulation: potential role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Biol Psychiatry. 2010;67(2):125–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Li W, Ji CJ, Yang KB, Cai HP, Wang X, Wei YJ, et al. Evaluation of efficacy and safety about sub-threshold modified electroconvulsive therapy for depression. Chin J Psychiatry. 2020;53(01):42–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lapidus KA, Shin JS, Pasculli RM, Briggs MC, Popeo DM, Kellner CH. Low-dose right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy (ECT): effectiveness of the first treatment. J ECT. 2013;29(2):83–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sackeim HA, Decina P, Kanzler M, Kerr B, Malitz S. Effects of electrode placement on the efficacy of titrated, low-dose ECT. Am J Psychiatry. 1987;144(11):1449–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Higgins J, Higgins J. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2008:Ltd: Chichester: Wiley.

  21. Kang HJ, Voleti B, Hajszan T, Rajkowska G, Stockmeier CA, Licznerski P, et al. Decreased expression of synapse-related genes and loss of synapses in major depressive disorder. Nat Med. 2012;18(9):1413–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Padmanabhan JL, Cooke D, Joutsa J, Siddiqi SH, Ferguson M, Darby RR, et al. A human depression circuit derived from focal brain lesions. Biol Psychiatry. 2019;86(10):749–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang XQ, Zhang L, Xia ZY, Chen JY, Fang Y, Ding YQ. PTEN in prefrontal cortex is essential in regulating depression-like behaviors in mice. Transl Psychiatry. 2021;11(1):185.

  24. Blumenfeld H, McNally KA, Ostroff RB, Zubal IG. Targeted prefrontal cortical activation with bifrontal ECT. Psychiatry Res. 2003;123(3):165–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bailine SH, Rifkin A, Kayne E, Selzer JA, Vital-Herne J, Blieka M, et al. Comparison of bifrontal and bitemporal ECT for major depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157(1):121–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dunne RA, McLoughlin DM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of bifrontal electroconvulsive therapy versus bilateral and unilateral electroconvulsive therapy in depression. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2012;13(4):248–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Berlim MT, Van den Eynde F, Jeff DZ. Clinically meaningful efficacy and acceptability of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating primary major depression: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38(4):543–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Brunoni AR, Chaimani A, Moffa AH, Razza LB, Gattaz WF, Daskalakis ZJ, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the acute treatment of major depressive episodes: a systematic review with network meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiat. 2017;74(2):143–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Berlim MT, Van den Eynde F, Daskalakis ZJ. High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation accelerates and enhances the clinical response to antidepressants in major depression: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, and sham-controlled trials. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74(2):e122–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lefaucheur JP, André-Obadia N, Antal A, Ayache SS, Baeken C, Benninger DH, et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2014;125(11):2150–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen JJ, Zhao LB, Liu YY, Fan SH, Xie P. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of electroconvulsive therapy versus repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: a systematic review and multiple-treatments meta-analysis. Behav Brain Res. 2017;320:30–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mutz J, Vipulananthan V, Carter B, Hurlemann R, Fu CHY, Young AH. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-surgical brain stimulation for the acute treatment of major depressive episodes in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2019;364:l1079.

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This study was funded by the Science and Technology Planning Project of Liwan District of Guangzhou (202004034), Guangzhou Health Science and Technology Project (20211A011045), Guangzhou science and Technology Project of traditional Chinese Medicine and integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine (20211A011045), China International Medical Exchange Foundation (Z-2018–35-2002), Guangzhou Clinical Characteristic Technology Project (2019TS67), and Guangdong Hospital Association (2019ZD06). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study design: WZ and HCH; Data extraction: DBC, LMG and MH; Data analysis: DBC, LMG and MH; Drafting of the manuscript: DBC, HCH and WZ. Critical revision of the manuscript: XH and ZMS; Approval of the final version for publication: All the author.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hua-Cheng Hou or Wei Zheng.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in conducting this study or preparing the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, DB., Zhou, HR., Liang, WN. et al. Adjunctive Nonconvulsive Electrotherapy for Patients with Depression: a Systematic Review. Psychiatr Q 92, 1645–1656 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-021-09936-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-021-09936-5

Keywords

Navigation