Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding Perceptions of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: Descriptive and Injunctive Norms

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a major public health concern. Web-based personalized feedback interventions (PFIs) may be a cost-effective and efficient way to treat NSSI. In order to develop a PFI, it is imperative to assess descriptive and injunctive norms. The current study examines descriptive and injunctive norms of NSSI within college students and adults in the community, comparing how perceived norms may differ for those who do or do not engage in NSSI. Study 1 calculated percentages of NSSI behavior within the student sample. Study 2 then examined perceived descriptive and injunctive norms between those with and without history of NSSI in both samples. Study 1 indicated that 19% of undergraduate students had histories of NSSI. Additionally, there was a general tendency to overestimate the percentage of people who engage in NSSI and the number of times a typical person engages in NSSI. Finally, those who engaged in NSSI believed that most people do not understand why individuals engage in NSSI; comparatively, the majority of people without history of NSSI still indicated that they understand why others would engage in NSSI. These research findings may be utilized in a PFI to reduce shame and NSSI behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

The data that support the findings of the study are openly available on https://osf.io/3r4c8/.

Code Availability

The code that support the findings of the study are openly available on https://osf.io/3r4c8/.

References

  1. Klonsky ED. The functions of deliberate self-injury: A review of the evidence. Clin Psychol Rev. 2007;27:226–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Swannell SV, Martin GE, Page A, Hasking P, St John NJ. Prevalence of nonsuicidal self-injury in nonclinical samples: Systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2014;44:273–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bentley KH, Cassiello-Robbins CF, Vittorio L, Sauer-Zavala S, Barlow DH. The association between nonsuicidal self-injury and the emotional disorders: A meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015;37:72–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Whitlock J, Muehlenkamp J, Eckenrode J, Purington A, Baral Abrams G, Barreira P, et al. Nonsuicidal self-injury as a gateway to suicide in young adults. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52:486–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rowe SL, French RS, Henderson C, Ougrin D, Slade M, Moran P. Help-seeking behaviour and adolescent self-harm: A systematic review. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2014;48:1083–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gibson J, Booth R, Davenport J, Keogh K, Owens T. Dialectical behaviour therapy-informed skills training for deliberate self-harm: A controlled trial with 3-month follow-up data. Behav Res Ther. 2014;60:8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McMain SF, Links PS, Gnam WH, Guimond T, Cardish RJ, Korman L, et al. A randomized trial of Dialectical Behavior Therapy versus general psychiatric management for borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166:1365–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Priebe S, Bhatti N, Barnicot K, Bremner S, Gaglia A, Katsakou C, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy for self-harming patients with personality disorder: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Psychother Psychosom. 2012;81:356–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Verheul R, Van Den Bosch LMC, Koeter MWJ, De Ridder MAJ, Stijnen T, Van Den Brink W. Dialectical behaviour therapy for women with borderline personality disorder: 12-month, randomised clinical trial in the Netherlands. Br J Psychiatry. 2003;182:135–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gratz KL, Tull MT, Levy R. Randomized controlled trial and uncontrolled 9-month follow-up of an adjunctive emotion regulation group therapy for deliberate self-harm among women with borderline personality disorder. Psychol Med. 2014;44:2099–112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gratz KL, Roemer L. The relationship between emotion dysregulation and deliberate self-harm among female undergraduate students at an urban commuter university. Cogn Behav Ther. 2008;37:14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gratz KL, Tull MT. Extending research on the utility of an adjunctive emotion regulation group therapy for deliberate self-harm among women with borderline personality pathology. Personal Disord Theory Res Treat. 2011;2:316–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Andover MS, Schatten HT, Morris BW, Holman CS, Miller IW. An intervention for nonsuicidal self-injury in young adults: A pilot randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017;85:620–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dotson KB, Dunn ME, Bowers CA. Stand-alone personalized normative feedback for college student drinkers: A meta-analytic review, 2004 to 2014. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0139518.

  15. Perkins HW. Surveying the damage: A review of research on consequences of alcohol misuse in college populations. J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 2002;:91–100.

  16. Borsari B, Carey KB. Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: A meta-analytic integration. J Stud Alcohol. 2003;64:331–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller MB, Leffingwell T, Claborn K, Meier E, Walters S, Neighbors C. Personalized feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: an update of Walters & Neighbors (2005). Psychol Addict Behav J Soc Psychol Addict Behav. 2013;27:909–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Riper H, van Straten A, Keuken M, Smit F, Schippers G, Cuijpers P. Curbing problem drinking with personalized-feedback interventions: A meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36:247–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Scott-Sheldon LAJ, Carey KB, Elliott JC, Garey L, Carey MP. Efficacy of alcohol interventions for first-year college students: A meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014;82:177–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Heilbron N, Prinstein MJ. Peer influence and adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury: A theoretical review of mechanisms and moderators. Appl Prev Psychol. 2008;12:169–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Prinstein MJ, Heilbron N, Guerry JD, Franklin JC, Rancourt D, Simon V, et al. Peer influence and nonsuicidal self injury: Longitudinal results in community and clinically-referred adolescent samples. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2010;38:669–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Prinstein M, Wang S. False consensus and adolescent peer contagion: Examining discrepancies between perceptions and actual reported levels of friends’ deviant and health risk behaviors. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2005;33:293–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lynam DR, Gaughan ET, Miller JD, Miller DJ, Mullins-Sweatt S, Widiger TA. Assessing the basic traits associated with psychopathy: Development and validation of the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment. Psychol Assess. 2011;23:108–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Horton JJ, Chilton LB. The labor economics of paid crowdsourcing. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM conference on Electronic commerce - EC ’10. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: ACM Press; 2010. p. 209. https://doi.org/10.1145/1807342.1807376.

  25. Klonsky ED, Glenn CR. Assessing the functions of non-suicidal self-injury: Psychometric properties of the Inventory of Statements About Self-injury (ISAS). J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2009;31:215–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Baer JS, Stacy A, Larimer M. Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students. J Stud Alcohol. 1991;52:580–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. https://www.R-project.org/.

  28. RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Boston, MA: RStudio, PBC.; 2020. http://www.rstudio.com/.

  29. Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, McGowan LD, François R, et al. Welcome to the tidyverse. J Open Source Softw. 2019;4:1686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Saraff PD, Trujillo N, Pepper CM. Functions, consequences, and frequency of non-suicidal self-injury. Psychiatr Q. 2015;86:385–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Klonsky ED, Victor SE, Saffer BY. Nonsuicidal self-injury: What we know, and what we need to know. Can J Psychiatry. 2014;59:565–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Armey MF, Crowther JH, Miller IW. Changes in ecological momentary assessment reported affect associated with episodes of nonsuicidal self-injury. Behav Ther. 2011;42:579–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mahtani S, Hasking P, Melvin GA. Shame and non-suicidal self-injury: Conceptualization and preliminary test of a novel developmental model among emerging adults. J Youth Adolesc. 2019;48:753–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Jiwon Min, Susanna V. Lopez, Thad R. Leffingwell, Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt; Data Curation: Jiwon Min; Formal Analysis: Jiwon Min; Funding acquisition: Stephanie N. Mullin-Sweatt; Methodology: Jiwon Min, Susanna V. Lopez, Thad R. Leffingwell, Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt; Project administration: Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt (lead), Jiwon Min (supporting); Resources: Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt; Supervision: Thad R. Leffingwell (supporting), Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt (lead); Writing-original draft: Jiwon Min (lead), Susanna V. Lopez (supporting), Delaney S. Dunn (supporting); Writing-review & editing: Jiwon Min, Susanna V. Lopez, Delaney S. Dunn, Thad R. Leffingwell, Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research board and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was deemed exempt and approved by the Institutional Review Board at the home institution.

Consent to Participate

The study was deemed exempt by the Institutional Review Board since all participants were anonymous. Therefore, informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Min, J., Lopez, S.V., Dunn, D.S. et al. Understanding Perceptions of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: Descriptive and Injunctive Norms. Psychiatr Q 92, 1657–1671 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-021-09933-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-021-09933-8

Keywords

Navigation