Advertisement

Comparing the Effectiveness of a Guide Booklet to Simulation-Based Training for Management of Acute Agitation

  • J. Corey WilliamsEmail author
  • Lilanthi Balasuriya
  • Aaron Alexander-Bloch
  • Zheala Qayyum
Original Paper

Abstract

Simulation-based training may be an effective teaching modality for psychiatry residents; however, simulation-based training is an unstudied and underutilized aspect of psychiatry resident training. The objective of this study was to compare the teaching effectiveness of a simulation-based training to reading a resident on-call psychiatry guide booklet in improving the self-confidence and knowledge of residents that is necessary for managing acutely agitated patients. Pre-intervention self-confidence and knowledge were measured for all residents using a Likert scale questionnaire and a clinical vignette questionnaire, respectively. Residents (n = 23) were randomly assigned to either the simulation group (n = 12) or the guide booklet group (n = 11). Residents in the simulation group completed the simulation-based training, and residents in the guide booklet group were instructed to read the corresponding pages of the booklet regarding management of acute agitation. The comparative teaching effectiveness of the guide booklet and simulation-based training was measured with a post-intervention self-confidence questionnaire and a clinical vignette questionnaire. The study spanned approximately one academic year (July 2016– Sept 2017). Residents who participated in the simulation-based training showed significantly greater improvement in self-confidence (simulation median improvement = 1.458 vs. guide median improvement = 0.033, p = 0.002) and knowledge (simulation median improvement = 0.135 vs. guide median improvement = 0.021, p = 0.0124). Simulation-based training was more effective at improving residents’ self-confidence and knowledge compared to the on-call psychiatry booklet for the management of acutely agitated patients. Though simulation is being used in other specialties, it is a very underutilized tool in the field of psychiatry. This finding underscores the potential for simulation-based training in residency programs to improve resident learning.

Keywords

Medical education Simulation Residency Behavioral emergency 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank James Mele, Dan Shabet, Emeric Bojarski, Jennifer Case, Alicia Londono, Yale Simulation Center Staff, and Yale Psychiatric Hospital Staff.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Disclosure Statement

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author confirms that there are no conflicts of interest, including financial or personal, that impacted this study.

Ethical Considerations (e.g., IRB information, consent process, if applicable)

The study was designated IRB exempt status by Yale University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board

References

  1. 1.
    Allen MH, et al. The expert consensus guideline series. Treatment of behavioral emergencies 2005. J Psychiatr Pract. 2005;11(Suppl 1):5–108 quiz 110-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nijman HL, et al. Fifteen years of research with the staff observation aggression scale: a review. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2005;111(1):12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pascual JC, et al. A naturalistic study: 100 consecutive episodes of acute agitation in a psychiatric emergency department. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2006;34(4):239–44.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sachs GS. A review of agitation in mental illness: burden of illness and underlying pathology. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67(Suppl 10):5–12.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schwartz TL, Park TL. Assaults by patients on psychiatric residents: a survey and training recommendations. Psychiatr Serv. 1999;50(3):381–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bradley P. The history of simulation in medical education and possible future directions. Med Educ. 2006;40(3):254–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cook DA, et al. Comparative effectiveness of technology-enhanced simulation versus other instructional methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Simul Healthc. 2012;7(5):308–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thomson AB, et al. How we developed an emergency psychiatry training course for new residents using principles of high-fidelity simulation. Med Teach. 2013;35(10):797–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zigman D, Young M, Chalk C. Using simulation to train junior psychiatry residents to work with agitated patients: a pilot study. Acad Psychiatry. 2013;37(1):38–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vestal HS, et al. Simulation-based training for residents in the Management of Acute Agitation: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Acad Psychiatry. 2017;41(1):62–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peabody JW, et al. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA. 2000;283(13):1715–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peabody JW, et al. Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: a prospective validation study. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(10):771–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sowden GL, et al. Clinical case vignettes: a promising tool to assess competence in the Management of Agitation. Acad Psychiatry. 2017;41(3):364–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Toutenburg H. Hollander, M., D. A. Wolfe: Nonparametric statistical methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York-Sydney-Tokyo-Mexico City 1973. 503 S., $9.50. Biom Z. 1975;17(8):526–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Children’s Hospital of PhiladelphiaDepartment of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryYale-New Haven HospitalNew HavenUSA
  3. 3.School of MedicineHarvard UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations