Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does Sexy Media Promote Teen Sex? A Meta-Analytic and Methodological Review

Psychiatric Quarterly volume 88, pages 349–358 (2017)Cite this article

Abstract

Parents and policy makers are often concerned that sexy media (media depicting or discussing sexual encounters) may promote sexual behavior in young viewers. There has been some debate among scholars regarding whether such media promote sexual behaviors. It remains unclear to what extent sexy media is a risk factor for increased sexual behavior among youth. The current study employed a meta-analysis of 22 correlational and longitudinal studies of sexy media effects on teen sexual behavior (n = 22,172). Moderator analyses examined methodological and science culture issues such as citation bias. Results indicated the presence only of very weak effects. General media use did not correlate with sexual behaviors (r = 0.005), and sexy media use correlated only weakly with sexual behaviors (r = 0.082) once other factors had been controlled. Higher effects were seen for studies with citation bias, and lower effects when family environment is controlled. The impact of media on teen sexuality was minimal with effect sizes near to zero.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Chandra A, Martino S, Miu A, et al.: Does watching sex on television predict teen pregnancy? Findings from a national longitudinal survey of youth. Pediatrics 122(5):1047–1054, 2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown J, L’Engle K, Pardun C, Guo G, Kenneavy K, Jackson C: Sexy media matter: Exposure to sexual content in music, movies, television, and magazines predicts Black and White adolescents’ sexual behavior. Pediatrics 117:1018–1027, 2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gottfried J, Vaala S, Bleakley A, Hennessy M, Jordan A: Does the effect of exposure to TV sex on adolescent sexual behavior vary by genre? Communication Research 40(1):73–95, 2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Steinberg L, Monahan K: Adolescents’ exposure to sexy media does not hasten the initiation of sexual intercourse. Developmental Psychology 47(2):562–576, 2011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Martino S, Collins R, Kanouse D, Elliott M, Berry S: Social cognitive processes mediating the relationship between exposure to television’s sexual content and adolescents’ sexual behavior. Journal of Personality and Social 89(6):914–924, 2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Collins R, Martino S, Elliott M, Miu A: Relationships between adolescent sexual outcomes and exposure to sex in media: Robustness to propensity-based analysis. Developmental Psychology 47(2):585–591, 2011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Savage J, Yancey C: The effects of media violence exposure on criminal aggression: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior 35(6):772–791, 2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosenthal R, DiMatteo M: Meta analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology 52:59–82, 2001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Farley J, Lehmann D, Sawyer A: Empirical marketing generalization using meta-analysis. Marketing Science 14:G36–G46, 1995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Raju N, Fralicx R, Steinhaus S: Covariance and regression slope models for studying validity generalization. Applied Psychological Measurement 10(2):195–211, 1986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferguson C: Pay no attention to that data behind the curtain: On angry birds, happy children, scholarly squabbles, publication bias, and why betas rule metas. Perspectives on Psychological Science 10(5):683–691, 2015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Furuya-Kanamori L, Doi SA: Angry Birds, Angry Children, and Angry Meta-Analysts: A Reanalysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science 11(3):408–414, 2016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hennessy M, Bleakley A, Fishbein M, Jordan A: Estimating the longitudinal association between adolescent sexual behavior and exposure to sexual media content. Journal of Sex Research 46(6):586–596, 2009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bleakley A, Hennessy M, Fishbein M, Jordan A: Using the integrative model to explain how exposure to sexual media content influences adolescent sexual behavior. Health Education & Behavior 38(5):530–540, 2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferguson C: Do angry birds make for angry children? A meta-analysis of video game influences on children’s and adolescents’ aggression, mental health, prosocial behavior, and academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science 10(5):646–666, 2015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hunter J, Schmidt F: Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 2004

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferguson C, Brannick M: Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses. Psychological Methods 17(1):120–128, 2012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferguson C, Ivory J, Beaver K: Genetic, maternal, school, intelligence, and media use predictors of adult criminality: A longitudinal test of the catalyst model in adolescence through early adulthood. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma 22(5):447–460, 2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Widman L, Choukas-Bradley S, Noar SM, Nesi J, Garrett K: Parent-adolescent sexual communication and adolescent safer sex behavior: A meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics 170(1):52–61, 2016. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2731

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Robinson-Cimpian J: Conclusions inaccurate estimation of disparities due to mischievous responders: Several suggestions to assess conclusions. Educational Researcher 43:171–185, 2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Stetson University, 421 N. Woodland Blvd., Deland, FL, 32729, USA

    Christopher J. Ferguson

  2. IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Rune K. L. Nielsen

  3. Villanova University, Villanova, USA

    Patrick M. Markey

Authors
  1. Christopher J. Ferguson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rune K. L. Nielsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patrick M. Markey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher J. Ferguson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare they have no conflicts of interest to report.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferguson, C.J., Nielsen, R.K.L. & Markey, P.M. Does Sexy Media Promote Teen Sex? A Meta-Analytic and Methodological Review. Psychiatr Q 88, 349–358 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-016-9442-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-016-9442-2

Keywords

search

Navigation