A Systematic Analysis of Treatment Effects on Depressive Symptom Severity by Level of Coercion

Abstract

Few studies examine the effect of interpersonal, regulatory or legal coercion on the treatment of depressive symptoms. This retrospective case–control study compared the recovery rates of 574 adults whose level of coercion was scored on a 0–3 scale from fully voluntary to severe coercion when admitted to the Menninger Clinic between 2009 and 2014. The change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores (measuring depression severity) from admission to discharge served as the primary outcome measure. Level of coercion was not associated with a difference in rate of improvement in PHQ-9 score. Greater improvement in PHQ-9 scores was associated with (a) older age, (b) lack of a psychotic spectrum disorder diagnosis, (c) stronger working alliance with treatment team, and (d) less difficulty with emotional regulation [lower Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) scores]. DERS scores were the most impactful factor. This study suggests that licensure boards can continue to mandate treatment despite concerns that coercion may decrease treatment effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Begun AL, Murphy CM, Bolt D, Weinstein B, Strodhoff T, Short L, Shelley G. Characteristics of the safe at home instrument for assessing readiness to change intimate partner violence. Res Social Work Prac. 2003;13:80-107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Chamberlain P, Patterson G, Reid J, Kavanagh K, Forgatch M. Observation of client resistance. Behav Therapy. 1984;15:144-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lehmer M. Court-ordered therapy: making it work. Am J Foren Psychol. 1986;4(2):16-24.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Orlinsky DE, Howard KI. Process and outcome in psychotherapy. In: Garfield SL, Bergin AE, editors. Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, third edition. New York: Wiley; 1986. pp. 311-81.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Schottenfeld RS. Involuntary treatment of substance abuse disorders—impediments to success. Psychiatry. 1989;52:164-76.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rosenfeld BD. Court-ordered treatment of spouse abuse. Clin Psychol Rev. 1992;12:205-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Simpson DD, Joe GW, Rowan-Szal GA. Drug abuse treatment retention and process effects on follow-up outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depen.1997; 47:227-35.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Nolan J, Thompson AP. Psychological change in voluntary and legally coerced clients of a residential drug and alcohol treatment programme. Psychiat Psychol Law. 2009;16(3):458-472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Anglin MD, Brecht ML, Maddahian E. Pretreatment characteristics and treatment performance of legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance admissions. Criminology. 1989;27:537-57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Brecht ML, Anglin MD, Wang JC. Treatment effectiveness for legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance clients. J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1993;19(1):89-99.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    De Leon G. Legal pressure in therapeutic communities. J Drug Issues. 1988;18:625-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Burke AC, Gregoire TK. Substance Abuse Treatment Outcomes for Coerced and Noncoerced Clients. Health Soc Work. 2007;32(1):7-15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Johnson RS, Fowler JC, Sikes KA, Allen JG, Oldham JM. Fitness for duty: a systematic analysis of treatment effects on depression severity for mandated versus voluntary physicians. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2015;43:476-482.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Allen JG, Frueh BC, Ellis TE, Latini DM, Mahoney JS, Oldham JM, Sharp C, Wallin L. Integrating outcomes assessment and research into clinical care in inpatient adult psychiatric treatment. Bull Menninger Clin. 2009;73:259-295.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Allen JG, O’Malley F, Freeman C, Bateman AW. Promoting mentalizing in brief treatment. In: Fonagy P, Bateman AW, editors. Handbook of mentalizing in mental health practice. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2012. pp. 159-196.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Groat M, Allen JG. Promoting mentalizing in experiential psychoeducational groups: from agency and authority to authorship. Bull Menninger Clin. 2011;75:315-343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Linehan MM. Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Fowler JC, Allen JG, Oldham JM, Frueh BC. Exposure to interpersonal trauma, attachment insecurity, and depression severity. J Affect Disorders. 2013;149:313-318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9 — validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:606–13.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams J BW, Lowe B. The patient health questionnaire somatic, anxiety and depressive symptom scales: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010;32(4):345-359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition, text revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Pilkonis PA, Heape CL, Proietti JM, Clark SW, McDavid JD, Pitts TE. The reliability and validity of two structured diagnostic interviews for personality disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995;52:1025–1033.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Scott Johnson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scott Johnson, R., Christopher Fowler, J., Jani, S.N. et al. A Systematic Analysis of Treatment Effects on Depressive Symptom Severity by Level of Coercion. Psychiatr Q 88, 39–46 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-016-9433-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Depression
  • PHQ-9
  • Coercion
  • Fitness for duty