Embedding a Recovery Orientation into Neuroscience Research: Involving People with a Lived Experience in Research Activity
- 324 Downloads
This paper highlights the importance and value of involving people with a lived experience of mental ill health and recovery in neuroscience research activity. In this era of recovery oriented service delivery, involving people with the lived experience of mental illness in neuroscience research extends beyond their participation as “subjects”. The recovery paradigm reconceptualises people with the lived experience of mental ill health as experts by experience. To support this contribution, local policies and procedures, recovery-oriented training for neuroscience researchers, and dialogue about the practical applications of neuroscience research, are required.
KeywordsNeuroscience Recovery Community engagement Participation Consumer participation Recovery orientation
- 2.Australian Government National Health Medical Research Council. Statement on consumer participation on health and medical research, 2002. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/publications/r22-r23-r33-r34. Accessed 12 Jan 2015.
- 3.Two Can Associates. Developing training and support. Online resource. INVOLVE: Eastleigh, 2012. http://www.twocanassociates.co.uk/index.php. Accessed 12 Jan 2015.
- 4.McPin Foundation. McPin Foundation: Transforming mental health research, 2013. http://mcpin.org/. Accessed 12 Jan 2015.
- 6.Davidson L. Living outside mental illness: qualitative studies of recovery in schizophrenia. New York, New York University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
- 8.Gallagher S, Zahavi, D. The phenomenological mind: an introduction to philosophy of mind and cognitive science. 2nd ed. London, Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
- 21.Center for Community-Engaged Research (CCER). Institute of clinical and translational sciences. Washington University in St Louis, 2015. http://icts.wustl.edu/icts-researchers/icts-cores/find-services/by-core-name/center-for-community-engaged-research. Accessed 17 Oct 2013.
- 22.Staley K. An evaluation of service user involvement in studies adopted by the Mental Health Research Network. London, Mental Health Research Network. National Institute for Health Research (MHRN), 2012.Google Scholar
- 23.State Government of Victoria, Australia, Department of Health. Mental Illness Research Fund, 2014. http://www.health.vic.gov.au/mentalhealth/reform/mi-research-fund.htm. Accessed 2 June 2014.
- 24.Senterfitt W. The Denver Principles: the Original Manifesto of the PWA Self-Empowerment Movement. Los Angeles, Being Alive, 1998.Google Scholar
- 25.Crimp D, Rolston A. AIDS demographics. Seattle, Bay Press, 1990.Google Scholar
- 26.Ellis KA, Bush AI, Darby D, De Fazio D, Foster J, Hudson P, Ames D. The Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging: Methodology and baseline characteristics of 1112 individuals recruited for a longitudinal study of Alzheimer’s disease. International Psychogeriatrics 21(04):672–687, 2009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Department of Health. The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st century. London, Department of Health, 2001.Google Scholar
- 37.Cresswell J, Plano Clark V. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, 2007.Google Scholar
- 38.Davidson L, Ridgway P, Schmutte T, O’Connell M. Purposes and goals of service user involvement in mental health research. In Wallcraft J, Amering M, Schrank B (Eds) Handbook of service user involvement in mental health research, London, Wiley, 2009.Google Scholar
- 39.State Government of Victoria, Department of Human Services. Cumulative harm: a conceptual overview. Best interests series, 2007. http://www.dhs.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/589665/cumulative-harm-conceptual-overview-part1.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2015.