Skip to main content
Log in

Medical Rapid Response in Psychiatry: Reasons for Activation and Immediate Outcome

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 09 June 2015

Abstract

Rapid response teams are used to improve the recognition of acute deteriorations in medical and surgical settings. They are activated by abnormal physiological parameters, symptoms or clinical concern, and are believed to decrease hospital mortality rates. We evaluated the reasons for activation and the outcome of rapid response interventions in a 222-bed psychiatric hospital in New York City using data obtained at the time of all activations from January through November, 2012. The primary outcome was the admission rate to a medical or surgical unit for each of the main reasons for activation. The 169 activations were initiated by nursing staff (78.7 %) and psychiatrists (13 %) for acute changes in condition (64.5 %), abnormal physiological parameters (27.2 %) and non-specified concern (8.3 %). The most common reasons for activation were chest pain (14.2 %), fluctuating level of consciousness (9.5 %), hypertension (9.5 %), syncope or fall (8.9 %), hypotension (8.3 %), dyspnea (7.7 %) and seizures (5.9 %). The rapid response team transferred 127 (75.2 %) patients to the Emergency Department and 46 (27.2 %) were admitted to a medical or surgical unit. The admission rates were statistically similar for acute changes in condition, abnormal physiological parameters, and clinicians’ concern. In conclusion, a majority of rapid response activations in a self-standing psychiatric hospital were initiated by nursing staff for changes in condition, rather than for policy-specified abnormal physiological parameters. The findings suggest that a rapid response system may empower psychiatric nurses to use their clinical skills to identify patients requiring urgent transfer to a general hospital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berwick DM, Calkins DR, McCannon CJ, Hackbarth AD: The 1,00,000 lives campaign: Setting a goal and a deadline for improving health care quality. JAMA 295:324–327, 2006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Winters BD, Pham JC, Hunt EA, Guallar E, Berenholtz S, Pronovost PJ: Rapid response systems: A systematic review. Critical Care Medicine 35:1238–1243, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan PS, Jain R, Nallmothu BK, Berg, RA, Sasson C: Rapid response teams: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Internal Medicine 170:18–26, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Laurens NH, Dwyer TA: The effect of medical emergency teams on patient outcome: A review of the literature. International Journal of Nursing Practice 16:533–544, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Winters BD, Weaver SJ, Pfoh ER, Yang T, Pham JC, Dy SM: Rapid-response systems as a patient safety strategy: A systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine 158:417–425, 2013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Parr MJ, Hadfield JH, Flabouris A, Bishop G, Hillman K: The medical emergency team: 12 month analysis of reasons for activation, immediate outcome and not-for-resuscitation orders. Resuscitation 50:30–44, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Young L, Donald M, Parr M, Hillman K: The medical emergency team system: A two hospital comparison. Resuscitation 77:180–188, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Manu P, Kane JM, Correll CU: Sudden death in psychiatric patients. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 72:936–941, 2011.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ifteni P, Correll CU, Burtea V, Kane JM, Manu P: Sudden unexpected death in schizophrenia: Autopsy findings in psychiatric inpatients. Schizophrenia Research 155:72–76, 2014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leung MW, Xiong GL, Leamon MH, McCarron RM, Hales RE: General-Medical Hospital admissions from a public inpatient psychiatric health facility: A review of medical complications over 30 months. Psychosomatics 51:498–502, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Manu P, Asif M, Khan S, Ashraf H, Mani A, Guvenek-Cokol P, Lee H, Kane JM, Correll CU: Risk factors for medical deterioration of psychiatric inpatients: Opportunities for early recognition and prevention. Comprehensive Psychiatry 53:968–974, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tee A, Calzavacca P, Licari E, Goldsmith D, Bellomo R: Bench-to-bedside review: The MET syndrome—the challenges of researching and adopting medical emergency teams. Critical Care 12:205, 2008.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bagshaw SM, Mondor EE, Scouten C et al: A survey of nurses’ beliefs about the medical emergency team system in a Canadian tertiary hospital. American Journal of Critical Care 19:74–83, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Galhotra S, Scholle CC, Dew MA, et al: Medical emergency teams: A strategy for improving patient care and nursing wprk environments. Journal of Advanced Nursing 55:180–187, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Manu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manu, P., Loewenstein, K., Girshman, Y.J. et al. Medical Rapid Response in Psychiatry: Reasons for Activation and Immediate Outcome. Psychiatr Q 86, 625–632 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-015-9356-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-015-9356-4

Keywords

Navigation