Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Models of User Involvement in the Mental Health Context: Intentions and Implementation Challenges

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patient-centered care, shared decision-making, patient participation and the recovery model are models of care which incorporate user involvement and patients’ perspectives on their treatment and care. The aims of this paper are to examine these different care models and their association with user involvement in the mental health context and discuss some of the challenges associated with their implementation. The sources used are health policy documents and published literature and research on patient-centered care, shared decision-making, patient participation and recovery. The policy documents advocate that mental health services should be oriented towards patients’ or users’ needs, participation and involvement. These policies also emphasize recovery and integration of people with mental disorders in the community. However, these collaborative care models have generally been subject to limited empirical research about effectiveness. There are also challenges to implementation of the models in inpatient care. What evidence there is indicates tensions between patients’ and providers’ perspectives on treatment and care. There are issues related to risk and the person’s capacity for user involvement, and concerns about what role patients themselves wish to play in decision-making. Lack of competence and awareness among providers are further issues. Further work on training, evaluation and implementation is needed to ensure that inpatient mental health services are adapting user oriented care models at all levels of services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Norwegian Patient Rights Act, 2001, The Finnish Act on the Status and Rights of Patients No. 785/1992 and the Public Health Code. Law of March 4th 2002 in France pertaining to patients’ rights and the quality of the health care system.

References

  1. European Commission: Green paper. Improving the mental health of the population. Towards a strategy on mental health for the European Union. (COM (2005) 484); 2005. Brussels, Commission of the European Communities. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2005/com2005_0484en01.pdf

  2. WHO: Mental Health: Facing the Challenges, Building Solutions. Copenhagen, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, 2005

  3. WHO: Improving Health Systems and Services for Mental Health. Geneva, WHO, 2009

  4. Department of Health: Patient and Public Involvement in the New NHS. London, Statitionary Office, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  5. DHHS: New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America. (Final Report). Rockville, MD, Author, 2003. http://www.mentalhealthcommission.gov/reports/FinalReport/downloads/FinalReport.pdf

  6. NHS Health Advisory Service: Voices in Partnership: Involving Users and Carers in Commissioning and Delivering Mental Health Services London, Stationery Office, 1997

  7. Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services: Åpenhet og helhet. Om psykiske lidelser og tjenestetilbudene. St meld 25 (1996–97). Oslo, Helsedirektoratet, 1996

  8. Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services: Om opptrappingsplan for psykisk helse 1999–2006. St prp nr 63 (1997–1998). Oslo, 1997. http://www.regjeringen.no

  9. Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services: Om verdiar for den norske helsetenesta, St meld nr 26 (1999–2000). Oslo, 1999. http://www.regjeringen.no

  10. Coulter A: Paternalism or partnership? British Medical Journal. 319(7212):719–720, 1999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Petrea I, Muijen M: Policices and Practices for Mental Health in Europe—Meeting the Challenges. Copenhagen, Denmark, WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  12. Borg M, Karlsson B, Kim HS: User involvement in community mental health services—principles and practices. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 16(3):285–292, 2009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bee P, Playle J, Lovell K, Barnes P, Gray R, Keeley P: Service user views and expectations of UK-registered mental health nurses: A systematic review of empirical research. International Journal of Nursing Studies 45(3):442–457, 2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oeye C, Bjelland AK, Skorpen A, Anderssen N: User participation when using milieu therapy in a psychiatric hospital in Norway: A mission impossible? Nursing Inquiry 16(4):287–296, 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Härter M, Müller H, Dirmaier J, Donner-Banzhoff N, Bieber C, Eich W: Patient participation and shared decision making in Germany—history, agents and current transfer to practice. Zeitschrift Für Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualität Im Gesundheitswesen 105(4):263–270, 2011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dieterich M, Irving CB, Park B, Marshall M: Intensive case management for severe mental illness (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online). (2), 2011

  17. Shean GD: Evidence-based psychosocial practices and recovery from schizophrenia. Psychiatry 72(4):307–320, 2009

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Department of Health: Supporting People with Long Term Conditions. Commissioning Personalised Care Planning: A Guide for Commissioners. London, 2009. http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_093360.pdf

  19. Norwegian Directorate of Health: Forskrift om IP med merknader. Oslo, Helsedirektoratet, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  20. Peplau HE: Interpersonal Relations in Nursing: A Conceptual Frame of Reference for Psychodynamic Nursing. Houndmills, MacMillan Education, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wills CE: Sharing decisions with patients: Moving beyond patient-centered care. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services 48(3):4–5, 2010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rogers CR: Client-centered Therapy: Its Current Practice, Implications, and Theory. New York, Houghton Mifflin, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rogers CR: On Becoming a Person: A Therapist’s View of Psychotherapy. London, Constable, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mead N, Bower P: Patient-centredness: A conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Social Science & Medicine 51(7):1087–1110, 2000

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lewin S, Skea Z, Entwistle V, Zwarenstein M, Dick J: Intervention for providers to promote a patient-centered approach in clinical consultations (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online) (1), 2009

  26. O’Donovan A: Patient-centred care in acute psychiatric admission units: Reality or rhetoric? Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing 14(6):542–548, 2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McCann TV, Baker H: Mutual relating: Developing interpersonal relationships in the community. Journal of Advanced Nursing 34(4):530–537, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Latvala E: Developing and testing methods for improving patient-oriented mental health care. Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing 9(1):41–47, 2002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Barker P. The Tidal Model: Developing an empowering, person-centred approach to recovery within psychiatric and mental health nursing. Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing 8(3):233–240, 2001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Barker P, Buchanan-Barker P. The tidal model of mental health recovery and reclamation: Application in acute care settings. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 31(3):171–180, 2010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Taylor TL, Killaspy H, Wright C, Turton P, White S, Kallert TW,…King MB: A systematic review of the international published literature relating to quality of institutional care for people with longer term mental health problems. [Review]. BMC Psychiatry (9):30, 2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T: Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science & Medicine 44(5):681–692, (1982), 1997

    Google Scholar 

  33. Duncan E, Best C, Hagen S: Shared decision making interventions for people with mental health conditions (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online) (1), 2010

  34. Rapley T: Distributed decision making: The anatomy of decisions-in-action. Sociology of Health & Illness 30(3):429–444, 2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Edwards A, Elwyn G: Inside the black box of shared decision-making distinguishing between the process of involvement and who makes the decision. Health Expectations (9):307–320, 2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Curtis LC, Wells SM, Penney DJ, Ghose SS, Mistler LA, Mahone IH, Lesko S: Pushing the envelope: Shared decision making in mental health. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 34(1):14–22, 2010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R: Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: The competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. The British Journal of General Practice: The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 50(460):892–899, 2000

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. O’Connor A, Bennett C, Stacey D, Barry M, Col N, Eden K,… Rovner D: Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online) (3), 2009

  39. Légaré F, Ratté S, Stacy D, Kryworuchko J, Gravel K, Graham ID, Turncotte S: Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals (Review). The Cochrane Database Of Systematic Reviews (Online) (5), 2010

  40. Deegan PE, Drake RE: Shared decision making and medication management in the recovery process. Psychiatric Services 57(11):1636–1639, 2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Deegan PE, Rapp C, Holter M, Riefer M: A program to support shared decision making in an outpatient psychiatric medication clinic. Psychiatric Services 59(6):603–605, 2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hamann J, Langer B, Winkler V, Busch R, Cohen R, Leucht S, Kissling W: Shared decision making for in-patients with schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 114(4):265–273, 2006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hamann J, Cohen R, Leucht S, Busch R, Kissling W. Shared decision-making and long-term outcome in schizophrenia treatment. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 68(7):992–997, 2007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Loh A, Simon D, Wills CE, Kriston L, Niebling W, Härter M. The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Patient Education and Counseling 67(3):324–332, 2007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cahill J. Patient participation: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 24(3):561–571, 1996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hickey G, Kipping C: Exploring the concept of user involvement in mental health through a participation continuum. Journal of Clinical Nursing 7(1):83–88, 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Thompson AGH: The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: A taxonomy. Social Science & Medicine 64(6):1297–1310, 2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Charles C, DeMaio S: Lay participation in health care decision making: A conceptual framework. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 18(4):881–904, 1993

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Crawford, MJ, Aldridge T, Bhui K, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T,… Fulop N: User involvement in the planning and delivery of mental health services: A cross-sectional survey of service users and providers. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 107(6):410–414, 2003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Crawford MJ, Fulop N: Patients or partners? Case studies of user involvement in the planning and delivery of adult mental health services in London. Social Science & Medicine 58(10):1973–1984, 2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Crawford MJ, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Bhui K, Fulop N, Tyrer P: Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. British Medical Journal 325(7375):1263–1265, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Davidson L: Recovery, self management and the expert patient—Changing the culture of mental health from a UK perspective. Journal of Mental Health 14(1):25–35, 2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Shepherd G, Boardman J, Slade M: Making Recovery a Reality. London, Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  54. Davidson L, Roe D: Recovery from versus recovery in serious mental illness: One strategy for lessening confusion plaguing recovery. Journal of Mental Health 16(4):459–470, 2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Harding CM, Zubin J, Strauss JS: Chronicity in Schizophrenia—fact partial fact or artifact. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 38(5):477–486, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Wilken JP: Understanding recovery from psychosis. A growing body of knowledge. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening 44(5):658–666, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  57. Davidson L, O’Connell MJ, Tondora J, Lawless M, Evans AC: Recovery in serious mental illness: A new wine or just a new bottle? Professional Psychology-Research and Practice 36(5):480–487, 2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Davidson L, O’Connell M, Tondora J, Styron T, Kangas K: The top ten concerns about recovery encountered in mental health system transformation. Psychiatric Services 57(5):640–645, 2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Borg M, Karlsson B, Tondora J, Davidson L: Implementing person-centered care in psychiatric rehabilitation: What does this involve? The Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences 46(2):84–93, 2009

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Storm M, Davidson L: Inpatients’ and providers’ experiences with user involvement in inpatient care. The Psychiatric Quarterly 81(2):111–125, 2010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Berwick DM: What ‘Patient-Centered’should mean: Confessions of an extremist. Health Affairs 28(4):555–565, 2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Institute of Medicin: Crossing the Quality Cashm: A New Health System for the 21th century. Washington, National Academy Press, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  63. Härter M, van der Weijden T, Elwyn G: Policy and practice developments in the implementation of shared decision making: An international perspective. Zeitschrift Für Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualität Im Gesundheitswesen 105(4):229–233, 2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Storm M, Hausken K, Knudsen K: Service user involvement in community mental health centers: service providers’ perspectives. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 57(6):551–563, 2011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Larsen IB: “Det sitter i veggene” Materialitet og mennesker i distriktspsykiatriske sentra “It’s embedded in the walls”—Materiality and people in district psychiatric centers. Philosophiae doctor (PhD) Dissertation, University of Bergen, Bergen, 2009

  66. NHS Department of Health Liberating the NHS: Legislative framework and next steps—Executive Summary. Whitehall, Department of Health, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  67. Davidson L, Haglund K, Stayner DA, Rakfeldt J, Chinman MJ, Kraemer TJ: ‘It was just realizing…that life isn’t one big horror’: A qualitative study of supported socialization. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 24(3), 275–292, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Simon D, Loh A, Wills CE, Härter M: Depressed patients’ perceptions of depression treatment decision-making. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy 10(1):62–74, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  69. Campell L, Kisely S: Advance treatment directives for peopel with severe mental illness (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online) (3), 2010

  70. Hamann J, Leucht S, Kissling W: Shared decision making in psychiatry. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 107(6):403–409, 2003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Boyatzis RE: The competent manager. A model for effective performance. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  72. Storm M, Knudsen K, Davidson L, Hausken K, Johannessen JO: ‘Service user involvement in practice’: The evaluation of an intervention program for service providers and inpatients in Norwegian Community Mental Health Centers Psychosis 3(1):29–40, 2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Professor Karina Aase Department of Health Studies at the University of Stavanger for her helpful comments in the last phase of the manuscript preparation.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marianne Storm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Storm, M., Edwards, A. Models of User Involvement in the Mental Health Context: Intentions and Implementation Challenges. Psychiatr Q 84, 313–327 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-012-9247-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-012-9247-x

Keywords

Navigation