The next step for literacy
The world community committed to support universal access to basic education in 1990. Since then, schools have been built and teachers hired and trained. Twenty years later, many more students were in primary school, but learning assessments showed that most were not learning how to read well enough to use reading to learn. The world community turned its attention to improving instruction. As instruction improved, more students could decode words and read with improved speed and accuracy. However, reading comprehension was still low. Now is the time for the world community to come together and make a commitment that all students will learn to read with sufficient comprehension to use reading to learn.
KeywordsLiteracy Reading comprehension Learning to read
- Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Omanson, R. C. (1987). The effects and uses of diverse vocabulary instructional techniques. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 147–163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Daane, M. C., Campbell, J. R., Grigg, W. S., Goodman, M. J., & Oranje, A. (2005). Fourth-grade students reading aloud: NAEP 2002 special study of oral reading. NCES 2006-469. U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Dehaene, S. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
- Gove, A., & Wetterberg, A. (2011). The early grade reading assessment: Applications and interventions to improve basic literacy. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI Press. http://www.rti.org/pubs/bk-0007-1109-wetterberg.pdf.
- Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Lowerse, M. M. (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository texts? In A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 82–98). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. (2005). Oral reading fluency data. http://www.fehb.org/CSE/CCSEConference2011/Wright/wright_Pre_Conference%20Hasbrouck%20&%20Tindal%20oralreadingfluency%20norms.2005.pdf.
- Hogan, T. P., Bridges, M. S., Justice, L. M., & Cain, K. (2011). Increasing higher level language skills to improve reading comprehension. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44(3), 1–19.Google Scholar
- Mullis, I., Martin, M., Foy, P., & Drucker, K. (2012). PIRLS 2011 international results in reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: IEA [International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement]. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2011/downloads/P11_IR_FullBook.pdf.
- NRP [National Reading Panel] (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.Google Scholar
- Pressley, M. (1998). Reading instruction that works. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1465.html.
- Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Alexander, A. W. (2001). Principles of fluency instruction in reading: Relationships with established empirical outcomes. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency and the brain. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
- UNESCO (1990). Final report world conference on Education for All: Meeting basic learning needs. Paris: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0009/000975/097551e.pdf.
- UNESCO (2015). Education for All 2000–2015: Achievements and challenges. Education for All Global Monitoring Report. Paris: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002322/232205e.pdf.
- White, S. (2011). Understanding adult functional literacy: Connecting text features, task demands, and respondent skills. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar