Advertisement

PROSPECTS

pp 1–21 | Cite as

Resourcing inclusion: Introducing finance perspectives to inclusive education policy rhetoric

  • Christopher Johnstone
  • Sheryl Lazarus
  • Predrag Lazetic
  • Gordana Nikolic
Open File

Abstract

Across the Central Eastern European region, inclusive education has become a policy aim. Europeanization, influence of United Nations agencies, and shifts away from Soviet models of education have led to new policy aspirations for the inclusion of children with special education needs (SEN). At the same time, policies in many countries often lack the infrastructure or internal mechanisms required for successful implementation (such as funding, professional capacity, and public will). In this article, we examine one of these challenges: funding. Through simulations based on data collected by the authors in the Republic of Serbia, we examine approaches for funding children with SEN in inclusive classrooms without losing the supports provided to them in segregated settings. Our findings illustrate the possible approaches to adequate costing of inclusive education policies and potentially serve as a methodological reference beyond specific national contexts. They are, therefore, potentially applicable across Eastern European countries.

Keywords

Educational policy Education financing Inclusive education Europe Serbia 

References

  1. Ainscow, M., & Miles, S. (2009). Developing inclusive education systems: How can we move policies forward?. Manchester: University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  2. Artiles, A. J. & Kozleski, E. B. (2016). Inclusion’s promises and trajectories: Critical notes about future research on a venerable idea. Education Policy Analysis Annuals.  https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.1919.Google Scholar
  3. Burdett, N., & O’Donnell, S. (2016). Lost in translation? The challenges of educational policy borrowing. Educational Research, 58(2), 113–120.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2016.1168678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elster, J. (1992). Local justice: How institutions allocate scarce goods and necessary burdens. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Espinoza, O. (2007). Solving the equity-equality conceptual dilemma: A new model for analysis of the educational process. Educational Research, 49(4), 343–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education (2016). Financing of inclusive education: Background information report. Odense: European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. https://www.european-agency.org/sites/default/files/Financing%20of%20Inclusive%20Education%20-%20Background%20Information%20Report.pdf.
  7. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  8. Government of the Republic of Serbia (2014). Second national report on social inclusion and poverty reduction in the Republic of Serbia. Belgrade: Author.Google Scholar
  9. Greenberg, A. D., & Nielsen, A. H. (2015). The role of education in building soft skills: Putting into perspectives the priorities and opportunities for teaching collaboration and other soft skills in education. Duxbury, MA: Wainhouse Research.Google Scholar
  10. Jonsson, U. (2003). Human rights approach to development programming. Nairobi: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  11. Ladd, H. (2008). Reflections on equity, adequacy, and weighted student funding. Journal of Education, Finance, and Policy, 3, 401–423.Google Scholar
  12. Ladd, H. F., & Fiske, E. B. (2011). Weighted student funding in the Netherlands: A model for the U.S.? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(3), 470–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mégret, F. (2008). The disabilities convention: Human rights of persons with disabilities or disability rights? Human Rights Quarterly, 30(2), 494–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. MESTD [Ministry of Education, Science, and Technological Development (Serbia)] (2012). Monitoring of implementation of inclusive approach to the education system in Serbia. Belgrade: Government of Serbia.Google Scholar
  15. Miles, S., & Singal, N. (2010). The education for all and inclusive education debate: Conflict, contradiction or opportunity? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mitchell, D. (2009). Education for respect and understanding – inclusion and equity. Cambridge, UK: Commonwealth Education Partnerships. http://www.cedol.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/55-57-20091.pdf.
  17. NARS [National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia] (2009). Law on the fundamentals of the education system. Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 72/2009 (in Serbian).Google Scholar
  18. Nikolić, G., Lukić, E., & Janković, S. (2010). Pupils with developmental disabilities and difficulties in educational institutions in the Republic of Serbia. Belgrade: Institute for the Improvement of Education.Google Scholar
  19. Nikolić, G., & Popović, Z. (2013). Ispitivanje akademskih postignuća učenika u školama za obrazovanje učenika sa smetnjama u razvoju [Examining educational achievement of students with disabilities in schools]. Nastava I vaspitanji, 1, 25–39.Google Scholar
  20. Persky, J. (1995). Retrospectives: The ethology of homo economicus. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peters, S. (2003). Inclusive education: Achieving education for all by including those with disabilities and special education needs. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/614161468325299263/Inclusive-education-achieving-education-for-all-by-including-those-with-disabilities-and-special-education-needs.
  22. Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2003). Processes of policy borrowing in education: Some explanatory and analytical devices. Comparative Education, 39(4), 451–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pijl, S. J. (2014). Funding. In L. Florian (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of special education (pp. 251–261). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Pijl, S. J., & Dyson, A. (1998). Funding special education: A three-country study of demand oriented models. Comparative Education, 34(3), 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Republic of Serbia (2009). Report on implementation of Millennium Development Goals. Belgrade: Author.Google Scholar
  26. Robson, C. (2005). Students with disabilities, learning difficulties and disadvantages: Statistics and indicators (Vol. 2005, No. 17). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  27. Robertson, S., & Robertson, S. L. (2007). Globalisation, education and development: Ideas, actors and dynamics (Vol. 2). London: Division for International Development.Google Scholar
  28. Smagorinsky, P. (2012). Vygotsky. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 8(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
  29. Smyth, F., Shevlin, M., Buchner, T., Biewer, G., Flynn, P., Latimier, C., et al. (2014). Inclusive education in progress: Policy evolution in four European countries. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(4), 433–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia and UNICEF (2014). Serbia multiple indicator cluster survey and Serbia Roma settlements multiple indicator cluster survey, 2014: Final reports. Belgrade: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia and UNICEF.Google Scholar
  31. UNESCO (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education: Adopted by the World Conference on Special Needs Education: Access and Quality. Salamanca, Spain, 7–10 June 1994. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  32. UNESCO (2009). Policy guidelines on inclusion in education. Paris: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0017/001778/177849e.pdf.
  33. United Nations (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. New York, NY: UN. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html.
  34. Vygotsky, L. S. (1993). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 2): The fundamentals of defectology (abnormal psychology and learning disabilities), edited by R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton. New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
  35. Ysseldyke, J. E. (1987). Classification of handicapped students. In M. C. Wang, M. C. Reynolds, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of special education: Research and practice (pp. 253–271). New York, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© UNESCO IBE 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Johnstone
    • 1
  • Sheryl Lazarus
    • 2
  • Predrag Lazetic
    • 3
  • Gordana Nikolic
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Organizational Leadership, Policy, and DevelopmentUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.National Center on Educational OutcomesUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Department of SociologyUniversity of SurreyGuilfordUK
  4. 4.Faculty of EducationNovi Sad UniversitySomborSerbia

Personalised recommendations